Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States News

Bar Coding The World Away 470

778790 writes "The Bar Code, long used for inventory classification and sometimes feared as a tool of social engineering, has been regulated in the name of globalization, and the globe has defeated the United States. Bar Codes in America will now have more digits, to match the global bar code standard: the European Article Numbering Code."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Bar Coding The World Away

Comments Filter:
  • Why not be smarter? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Pig Hogger ( 10379 ) <pig.hogger@g[ ]l.com ['mai' in gap]> on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:36AM (#9675108) Journal
    Why not take the time to implement a flexible sytem which may allow to encore an arbitrary number of characters?

    This would last forever and be able to migrate through other technologies, such as RFID.

  • How long? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by toasted_calamari ( 670180 ) * <burningsquidNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:37AM (#9675136) Homepage Journal
    My question is how long will it take to get all the barcodes reassigned, and all the barcode hardware changed. I seem to recall that a large portion of US barcode readers are hardcoded to 12 digits. How much will this new bit of regulation cost?
  • by blanks ( 108019 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:38AM (#9675150) Homepage Journal
    What happens with all the old hardware/software that currently exists? How long until people will need to migrate to the new system, and will such things as rfid support the number system?
  • by furball ( 2853 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:40AM (#9675191) Journal
    Wal-Mart has been running with 13-digit codes for almost forever now. Amazon does likewise.

    To the best of my knowledge, I don't know anyone that works with strictly 12-digit codes on any mass level. Perhaps it's just the mom&pop shops with their possibly custom software that runs with 12-digits only.
  • Re:Damn (Score:4, Interesting)

    by MajorDick ( 735308 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:41AM (#9675197)
    Dont laugh, I have my SS# on my leg.....yes for real.....

    Why ? I was bored, and had a scar that needed covered, I couldnt think of anything that wouldnt be lame skulls etc, non my taste, so I figured If I ever get amnesia it would be nice to have (in case your wondering I'v had maybe 4 concussions, been declared dead once and had a skull fracture, perhaps THAT explains why I had my SS# put on my leg) in addiditon just in case noone has a scanner handy it is also printed in digits below as well.
  • Re:How long? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Chess_the_cat ( 653159 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:41AM (#9675199) Homepage
    Who says the US won't just forget the whole thing and start switching everything to RFID? Good time to start.
  • by Peyna ( 14792 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:45AM (#9675258) Homepage
    I don't think it'll be that difficult actually; it didn't take very long at all for Best Buy to modify their scanners to adapt to a host of different types of barcodes used for different things. For instance, all of the signs in the stores have a bar code which is actually the UPC + 1 digit sign style identifier + price; which allows employees to quickly scan the sign to verify if it displays the correct price.

    People using older cash register systems might be SOL though.
  • It's about time (Score:5, Interesting)

    by 1u3hr ( 530656 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:46AM (#9675262)
    You may notice that most books sold in the USA have two barcodes, an EAN-13 one (for the rest of the world) and a UPC one. It's a drag having to support those troglodyte US companies that insist on having their UPC. Books published overseas often have to pay to have a UPC code stickered to them.

    Next up, metres and kilogrammes (you can spell them American if you really want).

  • by TyrranzzX ( 617713 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:46AM (#9675265) Journal
    It makes no sense. Why the hell would you want to move everyone onto the same UPC code standard? Ok, fine, you can standardise devices, big freggin deal. Barcode reading software is minimal, as are the readers. Sure, it may also make it easier to streamline shipping; the boxes could arrive at the store pre-upc'd and numbered and ready to go: TP get's it's own bar-code addressing space, whuptiedoo.

    Then again, certain ISO standards....*shutter*.

    For the tin foil madhatters out there, the standard doesn't provide enough addressing space to address dittly squat. I suppose getting everyone on the same standard is a step in that direction, since the next step could be setting up bar-codes that do have unique addresses (people'll be reading codes off in base-64) for later, but still.

    Anyway, this may work in our favor; if the codes are standardised and it looks like there's country codes on them, one can memorise the codes you can tell which products are most likely baught from 3rd world countries via slave labor, and which are local. You can tell when they bring in the big crate of oranges from the big upc sticker weither or not they're from mexico and sprayed with DDT or not.

    MMMMMMmmmm...I'v stayed up too late. I need to get some popcorn and coffie, get wired, and do some studying.



  • by LostCluster ( 625375 ) * on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:47AM (#9675274)
    Barcodes themselves can be as long as the user wants them to be. We're just talking about a change in the addressing scheme that is the UPC code to have another digit. Anybody who assumed UPCs were no bigger than 12 characters now has a Y2K-ish overflow issue.
  • by ajlitt ( 19055 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:50AM (#9675321)
    Many modern (made within the last 5-10 years) barcode scanners are firmware-upgradeable. New standards for barcodes are always being released by one industry or another, and systems within manufacturing, shipping, and warehousing companies need to adapt to handling the new data formats quickly.

    As for the older, fixed function models, well, barcode readers get a lot of abuse, and are usually replaced every so often anyway due to wear and tear. Even better, the older supermarket checkout units have HeNe gas-discharge lasers which have a much shorter service life than their solid-state counterparts.
  • by slimyrubber ( 791109 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:56AM (#9675383)
    And the first bar code reader was built by Woodland (who was an IBM employee at the time) and Silver in 1952 and included a 500 watt light bulb and a photomultiplier vacuum tube made by RCA for movie sound tracks.

    GASP!
  • by theguywhosaid ( 751709 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @11:59AM (#9675427) Homepage
    ... with a friend of mine, and all of the regular members had a barcode that was scanned for attendance. This really creeped me out, but the sevice (i guess it was more "sunday school") was nice, and I didn't have to get a code, since I was visiting. Does anyone know if this is common practice?
  • by midifarm ( 666278 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @12:06PM (#9675498) Homepage
    Let's say product X is assigned a barcode. Product X is discontinued. What happens to the assigned bar code?

    BTW who assigns barcode numbers and do they reap huge financial rewards from performing such a task?

    Peace

  • by MarkedMan ( 523274 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @12:09PM (#9675560)
    Just a nit, but one that happens to affect me greatly. The reality is that the people printing and/or applying the barcodes are the packaging operations. They typically understand very little. For some odd reason, the UPC standard prints the check digit in the interpretation (the human readable part of the barcode). Why is this an issue? Because one of the common mistakes operators make is to enter the entire code, including the check digit. So there are twelve digits when we were expecting eleven. Did they fat finger an extra character or enter the check digit?

    We've tried a few different ways over the years to insure the right number of characters, including forcing eleven by cropping, forcing eleven by not allowing entry (no good if the table is a linked one and the entry is outside of our software) or allowing 11 or 12 and checking the checksum if there are twelve. All this matters because the equipment used to print the barcode typcially generates the check digit on its own, and the different manufacturers handle excess digits in several different ways.

    The new standard now says we have three choices: 11,12 or 13. What do we do now? I'm not expecting an answer, because in the end we have to balance all the considerations and make Hobson's choice.

    I'm not even going to go into the major US corporation whose database consists of 10,11 or 12 digit UPC codes, because in the beginning, that first digit was always the same, so why waste space on it?

    Just goes to show you that when volume and/or speed increases, everything gets complicated (except rock).
  • Re:OSR... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Lehk228 ( 705449 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @12:23PM (#9675764) Journal
    you put your rod in a hog's head?
  • Re:Damn (Score:5, Interesting)

    by MajorDick ( 735308 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @12:39PM (#9675988)
    Motorcycle racing, actually Ive never hurt myself in a race , only in dorking around in practice and nearly all have been due to mechanical failure. In addition to my mentioned head injuries, I've broken my elbow, wrist, 10 ribs (at various times of course) my jaw, my right foot (twice) a couple of fingers and toes and had my knees so tore up I'm 33 and looking at knee replacments (actually I should say looking forward to then the damm things wont hurt anymore)

    But its all been worth it, I've had a blast Ive been racing since I was 9 , first Junior MX, Then by 14 Flat Track, then I got into Road Racing and I'm still doing it, although in the last 2 years I've raced Vintage, probably will till I croak, Ive actually thought SERIOUSLY about doing the Isle of Man TT, but I havent had a sponsor (other than contingency sponsors) since I was 18
  • Gov't anti-metric (Score:5, Interesting)

    by bill_mcgonigle ( 4333 ) * on Monday July 12, 2004 @12:49PM (#9676114) Homepage Journal
    Metric is actively discouraged by the government. It's done under the guise of promoting it, and it's quite subtle.

    For example, there'a sign on I-87 in NY which reads:

    Montreal 300 miles (482.8 km)

    There is no sign 50 miles later that says:

    Montreal 400 km (248.5 miles)

    so, you see, Imperial is easy, Metric is hard.
  • Re:More digits... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by cayenne8 ( 626475 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @01:11PM (#9676383) Homepage Journal
    "...we already have Social Security Numbers that follow us eveywhere"

    Well, that doesn't HAVE to be true...unless a transaction that is taking place involves SS taxable income,etc, you do NOT have to give your SS#, and I pretty much do not.

    Sure it is inconvenient, but, it can be done. When I wanted a cell phone, or ordered new cable service...I refused to give my SS#. In the case of the cell phone, they were just using it to run a credit check...and I want as few of those run as possible as that it can affect your credit rating, but, I digress. I had to give them something like a $200 deposit, and got signed up. I think I got the deposit sent back to me less than a year later.

    I had a hassle at a company I worked for once...I refused to let the company's insurance have my SS...I told them to generate a new ID for me...after a little bitching...they gave me one. Thankfully, it is getting alittle easier to avoid giving the SS these days...due to people understanding identity theft being a problem (I've had mine stolen 3 times).

    Not to mention the fact, it is a horrible number for a unique identifier from a database viewpoint. It cannot be counted on to be unique....the numbers are recycled...you cannot count on everyone HAVING one...and you cannot count on them being exactly 9 digits...many foreign national guests of the military are given special 'SS' numbers...that have extra digits to identify them as special...etc.

    So, just because someone asks for it, you don't have to give it......and you should not!

  • by MarkedMan ( 523274 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @01:29PM (#9676581)
    In a perfect world, you are absolutely correct. But the reality, which is what I have to deal with, is far from that perfect world. UPC codes can come from a database, in which case they were obtained or generated without the check digit, or they can come from an operator. Any practical system must accomodate both inputs (plus even more, but these two make my point).

    Believe me, it would never be acceptable in a production environment to say "our product will shut down your production until a) you have the database fixed or b) you have the operator better trained.

    BTW, input is only one reason for the check digit. Probably more important is that it allows the scanner to know whether or not it misread the barcode.
  • Re:More digits... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by cayenne8 ( 626475 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @01:35PM (#9676638) Homepage Journal
    "What in the world for? Are these people working, and having money drawn out to pay for retirement? If not, isn't it just another military ID number unrelated to the SS number?"

    I dunno...never heard the true explanation, but, got the info from our SME (subject matter expert) on a DoD database project I worked on once...

  • Re:More digits... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Rei ( 128717 ) on Monday July 12, 2004 @01:43PM (#9676742) Homepage
    You know, there are many long-continued misunderstandings of the bible and within the bible itself, and the whole "666" thing is one of them (the former category). It's not three sixes. It's chi-xi-digamma. The greek counting system used their alphabet. Instead of having a set of only 10 numbers total and having the ordering determine significant digits such as we do, they assigned 10 numbers for the 1s digit, another 10 for the 10s digit, another 10 for the 100s, etc. And, instead of having separate characters as we do, they used their alphabet (in addition to some discontinued alphabetic characters, such as the digamma). So, the mark of the beast isn't three identical sixes; it is both a specific number (six hundred sixty and six) and a name (chi-xi-digamma).

    Other common misunderstandings: "Lucifer" (Lux+Ferre = Light Bringer) is not Satan; the phrase is "a ROPE through the eye of a needle" (camelis != camel!!!); there is linguistic confusion over whether Mary was a virgin (neanis vs. parthenos, alma vs. bethusaleh, etc; there's also some evidence that parthenos did not carry its modern connotation); etc

The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh

Working...