Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Television Media Technology

Hollywood and NFL Fight TiVo 344

An anonymous reader writes "MSNBC/Washington Post is reporting that the NFL and tinseltown have asked the FCC to stop TiVo from expanding its service to include the ability to transfer recordings to PC's and other remote devices. TiVo says the system is secure. I say its source code will end up on the box. You do the math."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Hollywood and NFL Fight TiVo

Comments Filter:
  • But I need it... (Score:1, Interesting)

    by jeffshoaf ( 611794 ) * on Thursday July 22, 2004 @12:18PM (#9770469)
    Having lost the two programs I was saving to demo HD when my new DirecTV HD Tivo crapped out when it was only two months old, I'd really like a way to transfer stuff to a PC. DircTV promptly sent a replacement unit, but my demos were gone and they haven't been repeated yet. It'd suit me if I could just do an automated (or semi-automated) backup to a PC or another hard drive w/o having to crack the case.
  • by SollyCholly ( 777496 ) on Thursday July 22, 2004 @12:19PM (#9770485)
    I'm still not sure why more people haven't adopted ATI's All in Wonder cards. I use mine for everything that the TiVo can do, plus a lot of the stuff that you can hack the TiVo to do. I can login remotely and set it to record. I can burn VCD/SVCD/DVDs without hacking anything. And adding storage? I've got its cache and recording space set up on my NAS. And all for less than $150
  • by tomhudson ( 43916 ) <barbara,hudson&barbara-hudson,com> on Thursday July 22, 2004 @12:23PM (#9770549) Journal
    Interestingly enough, the same story mentions a bill that codifies into law your right to kill off objectional material. Maybe objectionable material can include, for example, advertising to minors.
    Meanwhile, yesterday, the House Judiciary Committee approved a bill that would significantly broaden user rights. The bill would exempt from copyright law technologies enabling users to zap objectionable parts of shows and movies so the programming can be viewed by children.
  • by baudilus ( 665036 ) on Thursday July 22, 2004 @12:24PM (#9770564)
    While I can see why the MPAA and NFL would want to fight Tivo on this, I don't think Tivo is doing anything revolutionary at all. Digitizing content from TV has been possible for several years. If it's illegal with Tivo, then it's illegal with a VCR, a DVD-R, a PC-base PVR, and a host of other ways to get broadcast TV onto the PC. There is no way this can possibly be enforced. Tivo is the target because it is the most popular commercially available PVR, plain and simple. I just don't see Tivo losing this battle.
  • by angle_slam ( 623817 ) on Thursday July 22, 2004 @12:29PM (#9770635)
    The NFL, the largest and most popular sport league in the US, is concerned that someone might TiVo a game and send it to someone else. Why? A game is only useful if it is live. Even a 1 hour delay makes the game's value nearly nil.

    There are two reasons a fan would want a TiVo'd game. (1) the game isn't broadcast in their area. E.g., a Steelers fan who lives in Nebraska might not get the Steelers on their TV. The solution: NFL Sunday Ticket. "But that's exclusive to DirecTV?" says the NFL. Well whose fucking fault is that. There are plenty of people who would be willing to pay for NFL Sunday Ticket if it were available through Cable companies. They can't because the greedy NFL signs a multi-billion dollar contract with DirecTV. (I want Sunday Ticket, but my apartment faces north. I can't get DirecTV.)

    (2) the game is blacked out. A Steelers fan might not see the Steelers because the game is blacked out. Actually, the Steelers are a bad example because they haven't been blacked out in 30 years. So let's use the Cardinals. Their home games are never broadcast in Phoenix because they never come close to selling out. The whole purpose of the blackout policy is to force fans to buy tickets to prevent the blackout. It obviously doesn't work because the Cards still only get 30,000 fans per game. So why do they still use this outdated, policy that doesn't work? None of the other major sports black out home game.

    The NFL can end the market for Tivo'd games by merely offering NFL Sunday Ticket to all cable companies and ending the blackout policy that doesn't work.

  • by jeblucas ( 560748 ) <jeblucas@@@gmail...com> on Thursday July 22, 2004 @12:29PM (#9770641) Homepage Journal
    I feel like a sheep. Like I'm just being sheparded around told what to like, how to like it, and how long to like it before have my hindquarters slapped over to the next pasture. "You're done enjoying that NFL game. Go watch this now." Everytime a company comes along and says "hey, we're not trying to screw you, do what you want," a thousand other companies come out of the woodwork to shout them down. This is just part-and-parcel with the following other travesties:
    • VoIP must be stopped! It lets people make phone calls without paying someone [other than the broadband provider]!
    • Making people pay [a fortune] for commercial television. I remember when people thought it was okay to pay for cable because you got things like HBO, which didn't have commercials. HBO still doesn't have commercials, but it's still an extra $12/mo on your $60 cable bill.
    • When did ease-of-use become piracy? I used to make mixtapes for girlfriends. I had the Jerky Boys calls on some umpteenth generation copy of a copy. I don't remember anyone up in arms about this--the Jerky Boys got a movie deal out of that underground phenomenon. Now that I can easily make a share a mix it's illegal?
    Don't give up everyone. Write your Congressperson [house.gov]. Some of you live in Utah [eff.org]. Do something about it [senate.gov].
  • by enrico_suave ( 179651 ) on Thursday July 22, 2004 @12:38PM (#9770759) Homepage
    I'll play your game rogue...

    There ARE easy to setup PC PVR options. I shlopped a PVR350 in a box paired with SageTV (review) [byopvr.com] and it was pretty simple.

    The cost thing is a valid concern. There is potentially a larger initial cash outlay (but no subscription fees.)

    With that said the DirectTV deals with Tivo (which are they still being offered? Didnt't DTV and tivo have a bitter divorce quite publiclly last month?) ARE a great value if you go the satellite route. Dual tuning, digital only stream, Tivo ease of use, low subscription...

    But out of the box without modification (software or hardware) you can't get the content off your DTV tivo box, which is the point of this article.

    Another compelling reason is if you are a paranoid schizo and don't trust TiVo (no matter WHAT their privacy statements say, and oh by the way they can change them at any time) about collecting info on your viewing habits... if you DIY you can have more control over what goes in and out of your DIY PVR (unless you tape MTV, I can't help the GIGO there)

    Note: I own and love my tivo and don't wear a tinfoil hat, just thought I point it out as a potential reasoning.

    Now if Dishnetwork and DirectTV would supply the needed daughter cards/access cards to digital satellite PCI PVR cards [hauppauge.com] we wouldn't be able to argue about the "re-encoding digital content" issue. (you can use those cards in Europe with subscription satellite services, but not here, from what I understand)

    *shrug* YMMV,

    e.
  • by hal2814 ( 725639 ) on Thursday July 22, 2004 @01:02PM (#9771034)
    The article makes it look like the NFL is concerned mostly with viewers overriding blackout rules. For those who don't know, if a broadcast station is within X miles of a stadium, a game is being played in that stadium that day, and the game is not sold out (I think that 85% of capacity is concidered sold out) then that broacast affiliate cannot air the game. This is called a blackout and the idea is that people who really want to see the game will need to go to the stadium to see it. Only after the stadium is full, can viewers watch it on TV.
  • by JudgeFurious ( 455868 ) on Thursday July 22, 2004 @01:39PM (#9771419)
    Well, I would.

    To begin with you would actually need to be a football fan. Since you start off with "Football is boring enough as it is" I think it's safe to assume that you're not one. Obviously this precludes any ability to see the point of recording football games (not that there's anything wrong with that of course).

    I live in Houston Texas. I'm a football fan and in 2002 the Houston Texans began playing. I've recorded every game and every off season I make about 100-120 copies for other Texans fans. Maybe the games aren't being shown in their area and they couldn't watch them or maybe they just want to watch a specific series or play again. Whatever the reason the demand seems pretty real to me.

    The NFL is exceptionally stupid in the way they handle their old footage. While TV studios are making bank selling old television series by the season the NFL sits on their old games and from time to time doles out a highlight DVD. If they would sell teams seasons to the fans they could be fleecing them year round (instead of just during football season with expensive tickets, parking, and $8 beer).

This file will self-destruct in five minutes.

Working...