Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Music Media Software

TiVo-like Application for XM Radio Under Fire 415

Strudelkugel writes "USA Today reports: 'Catching Blondie's reunion tour broadcast at 4 in the morning wasn't an option for XM satellite radio subscriber and single father Scott MacLean. "I was missing concerts that were being broadcasted when I was asleep or out," he said. So the 35-year-old computer programmer from Ottawa, Ontario, wrote a piece of software that let him record the show directly onto his PC hard drive while he snoozed.' As expected, the lawyers are coming out. Seems like a good idea, though. This capability might actually entice me to get an XM radio."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

TiVo-like Application for XM Radio Under Fire

Comments Filter:
  • by LostCluster ( 625375 ) * on Thursday August 26, 2004 @10:54PM (#10084839)
    From the XM site itself... [xmradio.com]

    The XM PCR revolution is in full effect. Across the XM Nation, we're excited to see independent developers creating fantastic new versions of the XM PCR software for a wide range of platforms including Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows.

    So they want people to come up with creative software to use the XM PCR unit, but just not this way?...
  • Frightening Snippet (Score:5, Interesting)

    by jmt9581 ( 554192 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:01PM (#10084896) Homepage

    A spokesman for the Recording Industry Association of America said his organization had not reviewed the software, but said that in principle it was disturbed by the idea. "We remain concerned about any devices or software that permit listeners to transform a broadcast into a music library," RIAA spokesman Jonathan Lamy said.

    The RIAA and XM are both busy figuring out if any copyright laws and user agreements have been broken.

    Nowhere in the article is there any mention of fair use rights or the legality of this sort of software. The RIAA is obviously very concerned about this, as it would definitely affect their willingness to release entire albums over the air. Blah.

  • Not a big deal.... (Score:1, Interesting)

    by FollowThisLogic ( 710628 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:03PM (#10084910)
    XM (Delphi) is coming out with the Skyfi2 pretty soon, which will have TiVo-like qualities... you can pause the radio and play it later, up to 30 minutes. It's only a matter of time for other features to take off.
  • by Graemee ( 524726 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:05PM (#10084919)
    Since our air waves are ruled by the CRTC overlords, when did they allow XM to sell it's services.

    From the XM FAQ

    Is XM Service available in Canada and Mexico?
    XM is only licensed to provide service to the US (All states except Alaska and Hawaii), its territories and adjacent waters. XM's satellite signal reaches into portions of Canada and Mexico near the U.S. borders however, XM's service is not currently sold in Canada, Mexico or any other region outside of the continental United States.


    Sounds like a grey market resale. Similar to the DBS grey market. You get an US address and subscribe. Since the border is not microwave proof we can pick up the signals.

    I think he should be more worried about the CRTC coming for him.
  • by ALpaca2500 ( 125123 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:06PM (#10084922) Homepage
    The audio is digital comming off the XM signal, but it's analog by the time it leaves the black box

    there's a mod too add a TOSlink connector to the xm pcr, which provides digital out. i dont have it on mine, but according to some tests people did, it's slightly better than the line out, with less white noise.
  • by another misanthrope ( 688068 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:07PM (#10084929)
    If you get a PVR from Dish Network (they now carry Sirrus) you can already grab digital music... does that mean I should be wary of a subpoena now?

    I usually just pause the station for 50 or 60 mins before I listen and then just FF through the songs I don't like. I don't feel like a criminal
  • by legojenn ( 462946 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:11PM (#10084956) Homepage
    I asked XM about service in Canada was told that the satellite was finely tuned and purchasing XM would probably be a waste of money. Considering I spend most of my time in Ottawa, which is close to the US, Montreal, which is closer or in New York State, I am surprised it would not work.

    Could it really be that they are afraid of the big, bad CRTC?

  • by Fiz Ocelot ( 642698 ) <baelzharon.gmail@com> on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:11PM (#10084959)
    They knew the sticky legal situation that would occur if they developed this, so they just left that to someone else. Now they have what I would consider a "killer app" for satellite radio without legal reprecussions. I'm even considering getting a home xm unit because of this, I already have it in my car.
  • Dear XM (Score:5, Interesting)

    by jeffkjo1 ( 663413 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:17PM (#10084989) Homepage
    Dear XM,

    Over the past few months, I have been evaluating purchasing and subscribing to a satellite radio service. I have been weighing pros and cons of both yours and the Sirrius service. I mostly came up with even hands. However, your recent disappointing legal actions against Scott MacLean have helped me make my final decision. I will not be purchasing or subscribing to any XM satellite radio service, and I will encourage my friends and neighbors to avoid your service as well.

    Thanks for your help,
    Jeff
  • Re:The real problem (Score:5, Interesting)

    by base3 ( 539820 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:23PM (#10085026)
    Talk all you want about the RIAAs business model, you simply can't possibly claim there's any shred of hope of making money when people just snag all theirs songs off of radio.

    Exactly. Which explains why the music industry was utterly destroyed by the cassette recorder, and finished off by ISA FM radio cards.

  • by Phat_Tony ( 661117 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:34PM (#10085077)
    It's not for XM (yet), but I wonder how the RIAA feels about the Griffin Radio Shark? [griffintechnology.com]

    They'll probably ignore it until there's a PC version.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:36PM (#10085090)
    Get a satellite DVB card for your computer.
    Get program http://audiorip.dvbnetwork.com/
    Point your dish to one of the DISH networks satellites or BellexpressVU.
    I'll record radio stream directly to your computer. You can record multiple audio channels at the same time if they're in the same satellite transporder. And if you put the magic software that decripts the nagra encryption. then you can get the sirius radio channels and do exactly the same.
  • by gnugie ( 757363 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:39PM (#10085111)
    XM already has a product that allows time-shifting, although only for 30 minutes. It seems they're fully in support of your rights, as long as they get to control them. http://www.delphi.com/news/pressReleases/pr29451-0 8182004 [delphi.com]
  • by iocat ( 572367 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:44PM (#10085132) Homepage Journal
    Off-topic, but you pushed a button...

    This is what kills me about all digital music... People frown on cassettes and analog records, but will happily listen to crappy MP3s... You can defeat *any* DRM by using a cable that goes from your line-out jack to your line-in jack. The horror of sound degradation from that method is not going to compare to how crappy you make the MP3 sound anyhow, so what's the big deal?

    Of course, most of the music I listen to (bad punk) was probably recorded in a garge with a condenser mike on a Panasonic Slim-line, so I don't really have any audiophile legs to stand on...

  • No such law (Score:5, Interesting)

    by jmorris42 ( 1458 ) * <{jmorris} {at} {beau.org}> on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:47PM (#10085152)
    Except we told Digital Convergence to FOAD in the CueCat: case and they did. Specifically I told them to "Come get some" and they never took me up on the offer.

    http://beau.org/~jmorris/linux/cuecat/
  • Uhh...What wins? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by teamhasnoi ( 554944 ) <teamhasnoi AT yahoo DOT com> on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:52PM (#10085174) Journal
    XM TOS [xmradio.com]

    b) Use Limitations.
    You may not reproduce, rebroadcast, or otherwise transmit the programming, record the programming, charge admission specifically for the purpose of listening to the programming, or distribute play lists of the programming. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9*, we or any of our programming partners may prosecute violations of the foregoing against you and other responsible parties in any court of competent jurisdiction, under the rules and regulations of the FCC, and other applicable laws. Subscription to the Service does not grant you the right to use any of our or our partners' trademarks.

    So - does this trump Fair Use or what? Obviously complicated by the whole Canada thing - but what about here?

    9. RESOLVING DISPUTES.

    In order to expedite and control the cost of disputes, you agree that any legal or equitable claim relating to this Agreement, or the Service (referred to as a "Claim") will be resolved as follows:

    c) Exceptions.

    Notwithstanding the foregoing:

    any dispute over the validity of either party's intellectual property rights or our licenses to operate our business;

    any Claim based on Section 9(b) above; and

    any dispute involving a violation of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. 605, or the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, may be decided only by a court of competent jurisdiction.

  • Re:Digital FM (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Mr Thinly Sliced ( 73041 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:53PM (#10085179) Journal
    Hmm - given enough recordings, we can find sections without the 'chatter' and reconstruct the entire song.

    Unless of course they actively distort the songs audio at start and end (think vocoder or something), but then, that would come across as extremely strange wouldn't it.
  • by calidoscope ( 312571 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:56PM (#10085195)
    (((In a letter seen by Reuters, XM's lawyers told MacLean to .. provide the company with a list of purchasers.)))

    Wonder if the typical slashdotter is starting to get the picture of why the NRA gets wigged out when gun registration is mentioned??? Besides, would XM turn over their customer list if some scumbag lawyer asked for it?

  • Re:No such law (Score:2, Interesting)

    by base3 ( 539820 ) on Thursday August 26, 2004 @11:57PM (#10085198)
    Just read your reply to their C&D. Quite heartwarming :).
  • Re:laws (Score:3, Interesting)

    by MadBiologist ( 657155 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @12:11AM (#10085254)
    Not breaking a law... instead, the XM Terms of Service...

    b) Use Limitations.
    You may not reproduce, rebroadcast, or otherwise transmit the programming, record the programming, charge admission specifically for the purpose of listening to the programming, or distribute play lists of the programming. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9, we or any of our programming partners may prosecute violations of the foregoing against you and other responsible parties in any court of competent jurisdiction, under the rules and regulations of the FCC, and other applicable laws. Subscription to the Service does not grant you the right to use any of our or our partners' trademarks

  • Re:Digital FM (Score:2, Interesting)

    by alamut ( 122156 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @12:12AM (#10085255)
    actually, if you watch the datastream coming down, the song metadata changes at semi-random intervals either bofore or after the audio stream begins.

    same effect, you lose either the first few or last few seconds of every song if you follow the metadata.

    that being said, i think XM rocks!
  • Re:Bleh (Score:5, Interesting)

    by waynelorentz ( 662271 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @12:21AM (#10085296) Homepage
    I don't see why anyone is so upset about this. I already do this with Sirius Satellite Radio.

    All Sirius subscribers have a login and password so they can stream Sirius channels over the internet when they're away from their satellite tuners (at work, in a different room of the house, etc...) I just start the stream and set a timer on one of the many OS X programs that does timed recordings of whatever's playing through the audio channel. I wake up and in a few minutes convert it (depending on the program I use) and move it to my iPod for listening on the train on the way to work.

    I don't have XM, so I don't know if this method is also possible with it. If so, then the lawyers simply can't stop this.
  • Re:thoughts (Score:3, Interesting)

    by An Onerous Coward ( 222037 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @12:26AM (#10085317) Homepage
    The fear, according to the article, is that people will use this system not merely for "time shifting," but to amass a huge music library. The latter doesn't fall under fair use at all.

    There's a professor here at the U of U who teaches a "Digital IP Law" class, and who seems to have done a lot of the thinking behind the INDUCE Act. So I decided not to take the class, for fear of the whole thing turning into a Slashdot-esque flame war where my GPA was on the line. But one interesting point he tried to drive home in some of his online material was that Sony vs. Betamax's "substantial non-infringing use" test should be invalid, because there was no way a recording/copying device could ever fail the test.

    I've been beating my head against a wall trying to come up with a counter-example. Any ideas?
  • Free hackers tool (Score:4, Interesting)

    by fm6 ( 162816 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @12:27AM (#10085319) Homepage Journal
    Sort of an interesting story, but not anything we haven't seen before. Fair use, big litigation-happy companies, yada, yada, yada.

    What much more interesting is that this same guy has written an ActiveX component [nerosoft.com] which you can use to write more applications like his -- and which is free for non-commercial use. Hackers, start your editors!

  • by Bob Munck ( 238707 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @12:31AM (#10085343) Homepage
    Just as a point of interest, DirecTiVo -- the combination of TiVo and DirecTV -- won't allow you to record the 40 or so music channels. It's probably the same irrational people. When XM does allow recording, they'll do it in such a way that they can block it for selected shows.
  • Re:The real problem (Score:4, Interesting)

    by An Onerous Coward ( 222037 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @12:35AM (#10085377) Homepage
    Ummm, I would point out that no court case has shown that it is legal to amass a music library that way. In fact, all Sony vs. Betamax showed was that the manufacturers of recording devices weren't responsible for their customers' abuses.

    Get it straight: The guy who wrote the software should be cleared under SvsB. The folks who abuse it, however, are protected only by their relative anonymity.

  • by VT_hawkeye ( 33442 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @12:48AM (#10085449) Homepage Journal
    They can and do broadcast to the dense population band within 100 mi (er, 160 km) of the US border. Americans with XM are driving into Canada and getting coverage all the time, and (obviously) grey-market Canadians are finding it worthwhile to subscribe. What they can't do without a Canadian license is place ground-based repeater stations, which makes XM near-useless in major cities' downtown areas but just fine everywhere else. The salesman was feeding the OP a line so he didn't have to explain the real issue (CRTC, CanCon, repeaters).

    I highly doubt you can get XM in the Yukon, NWT and Nunavut; the Edmonton area is probably the functional northern border. I'd wonder about Newfoundland and Labrador, just because of how far east (and north) they are, but the rest of the Maritimes ought to be OK.
  • by PeeAitchPee ( 712652 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @12:57AM (#10085493)
    For those of you that don't know, you can also get a PCR modded to include TOSLINK Digital Out [myradiostore.us]. I have one and it sounds very good, although the XM music feeds are not nearly CD quality (as other Slashdotters have already pointed out), and the talk radio sound quality is sometimes pretty bad due to the amount of compression they use.
  • Re:No such law (Score:3, Interesting)

    by randyest ( 589159 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @01:27AM (#10085621) Homepage
    I'll second that, and humbly ask permission to use your fine letter as a basis for (or possibly in toto as-is) my own response to such asshattery, should I ever need it.
  • by ahfoo ( 223186 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @02:00AM (#10085741) Journal
    tradition in the US.
    In the early part of the twentieth century, a fellow by the name of Anthony Comstock gained extrordinary powers using a similar tactic to that used by the RIAA today, ie a moral crusade against vice. Instead of thieving child porn traders Comstock was convinced obscenity and birth control would destoroy the nation.
    Comstock's enormous power came from the creation of a private organization called the New York Society for the Supression of Vice. Eventually, this private organization was allowed to place officers in US Post Offices to read through the mail looking for obscenity. This had nothing to do with the law per-se, he was simply well connected and feared.
    So, in the US it is quite possible, and even normal for a non-governmental agency to take on police powers despite the fact that this does not seem to make sense under law.
  • cooperate america (Score:2, Interesting)

    by bender183 ( 447302 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @02:12AM (#10085783)
    another case of cooperate america protecting what is "thiers" at the consumers cost. No matter what way you look at it the end user always gets f'd in the a. Thats american buisness nowadays.
  • Re:thoughts (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Alsee ( 515537 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @02:30AM (#10085835) Homepage
    to amass a huge music library. The latter doesn't fall under fair use at all.

    Really? And why not? I don't recall anything from the Betamax case, or from any other court case, to indicate you somehow commit copyright infringment if you play it a second time. And unless I'm mistaken the Betamax case did directly acknowledge that many of the people involve were keeping "libraries" of tapes. The Betamax judges never suggested that that was infringment.

    Sony vs. Betamax's "substantial non-infringing use" test should be invalid, because there was no way a recording/copying device could ever fail the test.

    I've been beating my head against a wall trying to come up with a counter-example. Any ideas?


    His conclusion does not logically follow. Even if we accept his assumption that no device would ever fail the test that in itself is NOT evidence that the test is invalid. *HE* is the one who needs to produce a "counter-example" and explain how it proves the court ruling is invalid.

    Copyright exists to promote new creation and new technology and progress in general. It does NOT give copyright holders the right to restrict technology and restrict devices and restrict independant creation and restrict progress.

    Copyright is not, and should not be, about devices and technologies themselves.

    Copyright holders are given the right to sue those who infringing, or those who intend to cause infringment and the like. For example someone was held liable for manufacturing videotapes specifically tailored to match the length of copyrighted works and specifically intended for mass producing infringing copies of those works. The devices themselves - tapes of those specific lengths - were not against the law. Other people remain perfectly free to make and sell those exact devices.

    -
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 27, 2004 @02:53AM (#10085901)
    he used to run an excellent email service for people with cell phones called dogphone. Really miss the service. I can't say I'm so keen on the XM Radio though - at least not yet anyway.
  • by twitter ( 104583 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @02:54AM (#10085905) Homepage Journal
    I don't think they expected it so early. XM adoption is about the same place cable TV was in the early 1980s, the early su^H^H adopter phase. At this time, there will be no commercials as well as excellent and diversified content to boost the reputation and build hype. Media types are less disturbed by looser control at this phase because early adopters are their real bread and butter. Time shifting directly onto computers was probably part of their plan, but for much later when commercials and a lack of content would make it worthless.

    If this program, legal as it is, can withstand the judicial extortion just launched, the world's four music publishers will have to accelerate things and that could be a serious set back to them. Chances are that they will move right to content free, commercial radio right away. This might impede the transition to a subscription model. That's where cable TV is today, right? Can you tell me that it's any better now than broadcast TV used to be? Oh, poor greed heads, trapped between current music models and taking it to the next level: subscription based, DRM'd broadcasts.

  • Comment removed (Score:2, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @04:07AM (#10086134)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Re:Uhh...What wins? (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 27, 2004 @04:33AM (#10086222)
    Sure it's breaking the contract, but what is the remedy? Breaking a contract isn't even illegal per se (that's just lying), it's only illegal to cause monetary damage *via* breaking a contract, and it has to be direct. "But he soon won't need us" isn't going to come close to cutting it.

    Second, if there is a remedy in the contract (such as cancellation) then that is all that XM will likely be entitled to. So, big whoopie. They get to cancel your contract, which I'm guessing they reserved the right to do at any time anyway.
  • Re:No such law (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 27, 2004 @08:19AM (#10086914)
    Except we told Digital Convergence to FOAD in the CueCat: case and they did. Specifically I told them to "Come get some" and they never took me up on the offer.

    http://beau.org/~jmorris/linux/cuecat/


    In an earlier age, a MAN with your spirit and balls wrote a letter (with some friends) to his KING and said enough is enough we're not doing what you say no more and if you don't like it come make us, and here are our names - and he signed his name REAL BIG so the king could read it without his glasses and to this day his name is a synonym for signing your name - i.e. writing your John Hancock.

    Bravo, Sir.
  • by EmagGeek ( 574360 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @08:25AM (#10086952) Journal
    I satisfied my term agreement a few months ago... while the service is nice, I will not support, financially or otherwise, illegal activities on the part of XM or RIAA. This guy is selling an enabler for Fair Use. Nothing wrong with that. If you make his software illegal, you have to make tape recorders, computers, and anything else that can make an analog recording, illegal as well..

  • John Hancock (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 27, 2004 @08:32AM (#10086989)
    Indeed, were the times that different?

    http://www.colonialhall.com/hancock/hancock.php
    says of those times :

    "and the counsels of her statesmen were employed to keep them in humble subjection. This was the object, when royalty grasped at their charters; when restrictions were laid upon their commerce and manufactures; when, by taxation, their resources were attempted to be withdrawn, and the doctrine inculcated, that it was rebellion for them to think and act for themselves."
  • by groot ( 198923 ) * on Friday August 27, 2004 @08:34AM (#10087006) Homepage Journal
    As an aside to this discussion of MP3 quality, I have notice (and I am sure others have too) that certain songs encode horibbly in MP3 (even with much tweaking of bitrates, etc). A good example of this Layla by Eric Clapton, it seems that background percussion starts to modulate the whole song (and no I was not on drugs at the time). Does anyone know of a website that gives suggestions for these tough nuts?
  • Re:laws (Score:3, Interesting)

    by liquidsin ( 398151 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @08:43AM (#10087067) Homepage
    I wonder, though, that since courts have already determined that recording for personal use is still protected, can the XM ToS legally revoke that right from you? I mean, they could claim that by listening to their service I'm consenting to anal sex with their CEO, but that doesn't make it legally binding.
  • XM PCR discontinued? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by dschuetz ( 10924 ) <.gro.tensad. .ta. .divad.> on Friday August 27, 2004 @09:03AM (#10087253)
    I'm reading on the forums at XMFan.com that XM will stop selling the USB-based PCR radio altogether, largely because of this software.

    1) that sucks, 'cause I wanted to figure out how to integrate the PCR into my in-house MP3 network, and

    2) it's crazy that they stop selling a product just because a small number of purchasers are doing something they don't like with it.

    I wonder how long it'll be before someone figures out how to modify the car tuner (XM Direct, if it ever ships) to be computer controlled...

    Anyway, I just thought I'd mention it. I haven't seen official confirmation (it's still on the XM website, for example), but the mods on XMFan seem to be in the know, and they're saying it's true.

    *sigh*
  • by GSITPilot ( 808798 ) on Friday August 27, 2004 @10:36AM (#10088216)
    XM has a low-pass filter that cuts out everything above 15 KHz, in order to mask compression artifacts. Listen to a song on XM, then listen to the same song on CD, and you'll hear a difference - the entire top end is missing on XM.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 27, 2004 @11:32AM (#10088774)
    Wow! I can't believe someone actually remembers DogPhone!! I'm glad you liked it. That service pissed off Fido, just like this application is now pissing off XM. Interesting that XM's response to my TimeTrax, after realizing that I'm not caving to their boilerplate cease and desist letter is to pull the hardware that works with it.

The Tao is like a glob pattern: used but never used up. It is like the extern void: filled with infinite possibilities.

Working...