Kevin Smith set for Clerks sequel 406
bckrispi writes "Director Kevin Smith has announced an official sequel to his indie cult classic, Clerks. Currently titled "The Passion of the Clerks", the film will pick up with Dante and Randal ten years after the original as our two heroes trudge through the malaise of their thirties. Jason Mewes, now out of rehab, is back on deck to play Jay across Smith's Silent Bob."
Budget (Score:5, Informative)
I think the budget is the reason. Clerks made it so the talent had to shine through because they had no money. Fans of Kevin Smith [viewaskew.com] will rejoice at this news. If you aren't a Kevin Smith fan, you could quickly become one if you happen to see An Evening With Kevin Smith [yahoo.com], where Kevin does hours of Q&A at universities, covering a multitude of topics including his dealings with the religious nut Prince (~Symbol~). Another topic is the strange dealings Kevin had with the creator of one of the Batman movies who kept talking about a huge mechanical spider (who went on to make WWW).
It would be likely much funnier to see "The Passion of the Clerks" stay within the same budget as the first one ($27 k), rather than use up a large studio budget. It's not going to happen, but it would be pretty awesome if they kept the budget low enough to let the talent and quirkiness shine through.
Re:Barely Clerkin? (Score:1, Informative)
It was at the end of Dogma, and the title was supposed to be "Still Clerkin"
From the horse's mouth (Score:5, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I'm very disappointed. (Score:5, Informative)
There are gonna be lots of folks expressing disappointment or downright hostility with the idea of this movie. Let 'em vent. If it's all that bad, Xtian will just sweep it off the board. But the last thing I'm interested in is opinions on what I'm doing this early in the process, if at all. The beauty of making that first flick was being able to do it in a vacuum. Granted, I could've kept my mouth shut about it 'til we were done shooting; but with "Clerks X" coming out, it just felt right to share. Regardless - I don't want folks running here with reports of what's being said about the idea of this film at other boards. Don't waste your/my time with the braying of the jackasses. There's not even a movie to bray about yet. Once there is, if you still still feel the need to tell me what some random, knuckle-headed Talk Backer has to say about the finished product, then God bless. But until then, leave it in the locker room.
Well since there are no girls on Slashdot I'll consider this the "locker room".
If it's not terribly related to Clerks other than the cast why can't you come up with some other completely different name for it? Why must it hang on the success of the first one?
How about you do it on a shoestring budget again? You know the studios will pick it up and they will be especially thrilled if they don't have to shell out millions to the pirates.
As for the rest of his comment I will keep quiet (as he asks) until I see the final result.
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
Read Kevin's comments before posting (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Oh, come on! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Again? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Million Dollar Question (Score:3, Informative)
from the horse's mouth on the view askew forums [viewaskew.com]:
Re:The Future (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Barely Clerkin? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Budget (Score:5, Informative)
Kevin talked about how he was like, "uh, yeah... sure... it's your movie, man" and the guy was just all freaky over getting this huge spider into the flick.
Then they brought Tim Burton in to direct it, who turned around and shredded Smith's screenplay. Burton got his own stable of writers in to re-write it until (apparently) it sucked so bad that the entire project got shelved.
Smith said that what really freaked him out was a couple of years later he went to see another movie that was produced by the same guy. It was The Wild, Wild West (I don't think he ever said who it was, but it sounded like it might've been Barry Sonnenfeld)... and what did he see in there? "A huge f!@#ing mechanical spider!"
An Evening With Kevin Smith... don't just watch it... go out and buy it. Unseen. Just buy it. You'll be glad you did.
Re:Think it Will Be Good (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Oh, come on! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Barely Clerkin? (Score:3, Informative)
Shannen Doherty (Beverly Hills 90210)
Janeane Garofalo (SNL, a number of movies before Dogma)
Chris Rock (standup)
George Carlin (standup)
Will Ferrell (SNL, more than a dozen movies)
Jon Stewart (Daily Show)
Tracy Morgan (SNL)
James van der Beek (Dawson's Creek)
Jason Biggs (American Pie)
Carrie Fisher (Star Wars, etc.)
Mark Hamill (Star Wars)
Wes Craven (director)
Alanis Morissette (singer)
Salma Hayek (Desperado, etc.)
None of these folks "got their start" in a Kevin Smith movie, yet starred in one or more of them. Come on, dude, Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back was one big cameofest.
Re:"Quick buck"?! (Score:3, Informative)
Box office data for Clerks [imdb.com]
The movie made over 10 times its budget at the box office. Very few movies can say that. Plus, the movie has to do huge bank on video, as where I live I haven't been able to rent it for ten years, as it's always sold out of every rental joint.
Who it was--Jon Peters (Score:2, Informative)
He's a high school dropout, former hairdresser to Barbara Streisand, so what do you expect? Yep, he went on to produce Wild, Wild West as well.
Re:Budget (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Huh (Score:2, Informative)
Also, you're forgetting Jackie Brown, a film that I really liked; definitely better than Pulp Fiction. Probably the most personal and "human" of his films, mostly steering clear of caricature, something he and Smith are both prone to.
Re:Oh, come on! (Score:2, Informative)
Happy Gilmore.