Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Television Media Data Storage Technology

Current Crop Of HDTV Recorders Compared 177

rbrander links to this "nice review of all the HDTV Recorders from the Washington Post: DirecTV's based on the TiVo wins for best interface, but Dish Network's gets a few nods. There's also a nice swipe ('...spectacularly stupid decision') at JVC's for allowing only (copy-protected) Firewire input to the one HDTV tape recorder on the market."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Current Crop Of HDTV Recorders Compared

Comments Filter:
  • by SensitiveMale ( 155605 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:18PM (#10320138)
    I do it all the time.

    Now you do lose the enhanced resolution BUT it does record in widescreen format which is nice for movies over cable.
  • Only copy protected? (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:20PM (#10320159)
    The DTheater has encrypyted tapes that can only be played on DTheater (the copy protection) compatible VCRs.

    I can record lots of open signals over the Firewire. The lower end one can be found for around $300, but the newer and more expensive ones are made a lot better.
  • by LostCluster ( 625375 ) * on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:21PM (#10320161)
    HDTV capture cards have a slight advantage over typical TV capture cards because they don't have to digitize anything from analog, they just have to remember the bitstream they were fed from the channel.

    Their disadvantage is that HDTV can be quite the high-bandwidth application, and that means the limitations of the PCI bus, and even the AGP connection can sometimes cause quality loss. PCI Express seems to be the solution to that in the pipeline, and that's most likely what the mainstream vendors are waiting for. An HD card on the market today has to be labeled as an "early adopter" model.

    On the other hand, maybe this is a technology that you want to be an early adopter of to avoid cards that end up getting crippled by "broadcast flag" laws.
  • by stratjakt ( 596332 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:22PM (#10320170) Journal
    There are a handful of HDTV cards out there, I saw ATI's HDTV-Wonder in action and it looked alright. I'm not recommending ATi, they make complete dogshit these days - so if their product seems to perform acceptably, the competition must really kick ass.

    The problem with trying to build an HTPC with HDTV powers, as I see it, is getting component output to the TV, or finding a TV with RGBS input (VGA plugs like your monitor). Scan converters from VGAHDTV are expensive and the picutre looks like ass.
  • by Matrix_X ( 145593 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:24PM (#10320193)
    I just got the SA8000HD box about a week ago. It's better than I thought but still has many glitches. 32megs of ram/16 video ram doesn't seem like enough, especially when it has a hard time keeping up with the HD streams that come in from Time Warner Cable.

    But, I have to say, it's nice to be able to record HD shows and the technology is only going to get better.

    Oh, and 5 bucks a month for the box isn't too bad either...... considering DirectTivo is around 1000.
  • by YetAnotherName ( 168064 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:25PM (#10320208) Homepage
    I've got two such cards, one is Linux only [pchdtv.com] and the other is Windows only [digitalconnection.com]. But since they both save the raw bitstream coming from over the air, files can be played back from both cards without modification.

    They're in separate systems and have access via NFS and SMB to a RAID array to save/playback all programming.
  • by LostCluster ( 625375 ) * on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:27PM (#10320229)
    A codebase split seems to have happened when the DirecTiVo units officially took on the name of "DirecTV DVR with TiVo service" and the monthly subscription price got halved from $9.95 to $4.95. Near that time, the fees for standalone TiVos moved upwards from $9.95 to $12.95...

    And at that point the DirecTV code froze, while development for the standalone TiVos continued. Apparently, DirecTV now must pay for any new features they want added to the DirecTV DVRs, meanwhile TiVo continued to push its latest stuff out for free to their direct subscribers. All of the things that a standard Series 2 TiVo can do that a Series 2 DirecTV DVR cannot were added after that point in time.
  • by frisbeeforfido ( 800724 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:28PM (#10320243) Homepage
    Look at the actual URL, not the one displayed.
  • by YetAnotherName ( 168064 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:28PM (#10320248) Homepage
    Oh and don't forget that current HDTV capture cards [eff.org] will be illegal on 2005.7.1. Buy 'em now while you can. Future models will have to support DRM via a broadcast flag. :-(
  • by arazor ( 55656 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:32PM (#10320279)
    I agree that the Tivo has the best interface and general coolness. But be aware that there is a very good chance that the HDMI port will not work at all or has to be messed with and even thats not 100%. If you dont believe just check the tivo community forums about this unit http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.ph p?s=f81a3d87b7dcd78fda0257b6df286bc6&threadid=1832 03

    That said if you do not plan to use the HDMI port by all means get one immediately DirecTV has several HD promotions going on right now and has plans to add a lot of HD programming in 2005 and 2006.
  • I have the HD Tivo (Score:5, Informative)

    by mp3zero ( 306357 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:33PM (#10320293)
    I know some (read most) people will think I am crazy but I recently purchased the DirecTV HD Tivo. I have had the unit for just over a week now and absolutely love it.

    The price: 999.00 (ouch, don't tell my wife)

    I have had DirecTV HDTV for about 6 months and really hated not being able to record the shows I like to watch. I found myself using my hacked/upgraded tivo (series 1 non-hd) to watch shows that also are aired in HD simply because I like skipping commercials.

    The quality of recorded shows are simply amazing. Especially Disovery HD and movies on HBO-HD. Very nice sound as it keeps the DD 5.1 soundtrack.

    Was it worth the 1000.00 I paid for it? Well, I priced out building a similar HTPC (Home theater PC) with 2 HD tuners and 2 OTA tuners and it was more expensive to roll my own. Also, mythTV does not worth well with direct (from what I have read). So I do believe it was worth the 1000.00 considering it does come with a 250gb hard drive (150.00). :) I know I know I know.. justify myself all the way to hell.

  • by Mondoz ( 672060 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:36PM (#10320329)
    After having a Tivo for the past year, using this box feels like being stabbed in the face...

    You can't search for shows very easily, if at all...
    The series subscription interface is horribly featureless...
    It doesn't give a darn about what you like, and certainly won't offer any suggestions of what you might like.

    Configuration menus are strewn about several different sections, accessable from lots of specalized buttons. TiVo's interface and menus are like a massage by comparison.

    If only the Tivo would record HD from cable.

    I do like having the cable box, HD convertor, and DVR in one single box, though.

    But for the time being, I'm going to let TiVo record to its heart's content.
    IMO, nothing will ever surpass TiVo in perfection of interface...
    TiVo 4 evar!!!
  • by GoRK ( 10018 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:37PM (#10320334) Homepage Journal
    What the article does not tell you is that the decision to include anything OTHER than a firewire input to the D-VHS VCR would have also required a REALTIME HDTV MPEG2 encoder in the VCR. By "the most popular 3 hdtv interconnects" they are probably talking about Component YUV, Component RGB, and DVI-D -- while these are indeed the most popular interconnects, they transport the already uncompressed video stream. To record them in DVHS format you'd have to recompress the video back to MPEG2, and remux the audio (and ensure sync). This alone would have sent the price of the unit skyrocketing. In addition the decision was not stupid, because as of April 1, 2004, cable companies are required to have the firewire transports on their devices, meaning that the decision for a firewire-only vcr would be fairly standards compliant as well as inexpensive.

    The nice thing about firewire transporting this is that the video arrives preencoded in a nice transport stream in full quality. The not-nice thing about it is that the FCC is also allowing the firewire to be C5 encrypted. I really really hope someone is working on breaking this one.
  • by McFly69 ( 603543 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:40PM (#10320367) Homepage
    I have HDTV and I am with Dishnetwork. There is a cheaper option to record programs and to receive HD tv. It would cost you under $200 to view HD and to record with the ability to record SD signals (There are only like 6 channels in HD anyways). The HD recievers are now on promotion (DirectTv and Dishnetwork). If you can get a 1 year contract, you can get the receiver around $80. Then you buy a modified Tivo box (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ite m=5721787901&fromMakeTrack=true) which will run you around $100. The Tivo box you can send the recorded stuff onto a computer for later viewing. Best of all, no monthly fees ever once you buy this unit. Let me know what others think. No this is not my auction.
  • by GoRK ( 10018 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:41PM (#10320371) Homepage Journal
    HDTV output to a PC is really quite easy if you simply make it a requirement when you are shopping for your TV. Tons of tv's have DVI-D inputs or RGBS on them, and they really arent more expensive than the tv's that don't. Just get one of these, and then, with some tweaking, pretty much any modern video card can be made to drive them. Apps such as powerstrip, et. al. make this pretty simple.
  • by mark0 ( 750639 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:41PM (#10320373)
    I get the same thing with my Series 2 TiVo right now. The simply listing is pretty fast, but the grid view fills in like Tetris on level 1...
  • by YetAnotherName ( 168064 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:43PM (#10320405) Homepage
    Both cards work admirably at tuning ATSC signals, capturing the bitstream, and saving them to disk.

    For playback, the MyHD card includes an MPEG decoder and component, VGA, and DVI output (as an option), so your PC can plug right into your HDTV. It can playback to a PC monitor, too. The driver and application are pretty well polished and easy to use. It comes with an I/R remote and a remote sensor that plugs into a serial port so you can keep your PC and keyboard hidden away and control card functions from the remote. It will also playback DVDs as well as DVD content ripped to hard disk.

    The The pcHDTV card relies on software applications (Xine) to decode and playback. The driver is enormously stable in my experience. Playing back content relies on correct configuration of Xine, the mpeg decoder, the program stream demultiplexor, and so forth. Not too hard for more experienced users.

    In my setup there's a Linux box that's responsible for recording only and a Windows box for playback only.
  • by arazor ( 55656 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:44PM (#10320415)
    FYI the series 2 DirecTivo's maybe even the HD ones Im not sure about that part can be "hacked" to run the newer Tivo software and other coolness. Just google to find the relavent instructions. of course doing all that voids warrantee etc...
  • by Helios1182 ( 629010 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:49PM (#10320474)
    Check out http://www.mythtv.org/ [mythtv.org]. They have some links to how to setup a MythTv.
  • by mmmbeer ( 9963 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:51PM (#10320497) Homepage
    I recently had quite a struggle getting a cable box with a 1394 port on it from my local cable co (BrightHouse Tampa). I had dreams of a pure digital connection from the tuner to the computer, right to file or to my XvMC X session. After finally getting it and connecting it to my computer, and writing a a good chunk of code to get it to talk through the firewire card in my linux box... every channel is either analog or 5C.

    Most the channels here in Tampa are analog and there is no MPEG encoder chip on the Scientific Atlanta 3250HD box, so that means nothing comes out of the firewire port for those channels. The rest of the channels are encrypted and flagged as CCI "once", meaning that only hardware that supports 5C can read it and that hardware must respect the "copy only once" intent of the flag. As far as I know, there is no way to decrypt 5C content in software, which leaves the user with unusable transport streams.

    I'd still love to work on a pure digital PVR (one that doesn't make several analog->digital->analog->etc convertsions once the signal gets to the box), but firewire definately doesn't further that cause.
  • by bmajik ( 96670 ) <matt@mattevans.org> on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:53PM (#10320516) Homepage Journal
    I have been a long time DirecTV customer but i just cancelled last week.

    I have a Hughes HDVR2 Series2 DirecTivo. It was cool and all, but what I really wanted was a way to get content off of it and watch it on a computer. No home media option for DirecTivo users though. Nice.

    The real reason we axed DirecTV (and have not replaced it, nor do we plan to) is that the content just isn't there compared with the price you pay for it.

    My big interests are F1 racing and World Rally. Speedchannel's coverage of same amounts to under 10 hours a month, tops. Sure, there is other stuff i _can_ watch (cartoon network, for instance) but i could take or leave it. One issue i find with a tivo is that i have all this stuff in there that i feel obligated to watch because its there and i enjoy watching it...

    My wife on the other hand is a minnesota twins fanatic. Yet there wer eless than 5 games available to us, even though we live within 3 hrs of minneapolis and have the local tv pack. The MLB extra innings deal is like $70 or $80 or something silly, and you cant ever get a straight answer on what will or wont be shown because of the ridiculous blackout and regional rights issues related to TV.

    So I was basically paying for a few races a month and then some time sucking.

    My wife was getting no twins games, but a whole boatload of junk off of TLC that managed to suck her day away. It would start innocently enough - "oh, i'll just watch an episode of blah while i do this chore" and then shes managed to waste the whole afternoon watching crap that isn't even all that interesting.

    So $45/mo for a bit of racing and a whole bunch of time wasting didn't seem like a good deal to us anymore.

    HD seems like an even worse deal. Where's the HD content ? The devices for doing HD PVR are "cool" (although i think any directivo solution will still have the lack of home-media i cited above) but you're talking like $60+ /mo for television and it seems like there's honestly nothing that enriching to watch. Seems like a better way to spend $60 a month is to use half of it to take your significant other out to some cheap resturant, and then donate the rest to a local organization.

    IMO, alot of whats coming right now is technology for technologies sake. I admit that i am captivated by the appeal of a distributed mythTV setup with FEs all over the house, but really, i shouldn't be watching enough tv to justify that.
  • by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) <drink@hyperlogos.org> on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:55PM (#10320539) Homepage Journal
    What about 64 bit and/or 66MHz PCI? That's available on many machines today. In fact I have two machines with 64 bit PCI in my house, and they're both PCs. My Yosemite Rev 1 G3 had both 64 bit and 66MHz, but not in the same slot.
  • by cft_128 ( 650084 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:57PM (#10320560)
    Their disadvantage is that HDTV can be quite the high-bandwidth application, and that means the limitations of the PCI bus, and even the AGP connection can sometimes cause quality loss.

    Uncompressed HDTV could cause those problems sure, but compressed streams (what you would be recording) are about 19.2Mb/s, a far cry from the theoretical cap of PCI. The AGP slot should be able to handle the uncompressed stream fine for display, after all it is only 1280x720 @ 60hz or 1920x1080 @ 30hz (or rather 1920x540@60hz) and most graphics card can exceed that by quite a bit (right now I'm at 1600x1200 @ 85hz on an old laptop).

  • Myth TV (Score:3, Informative)

    by McFly69 ( 603543 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:58PM (#10320564) Homepage
    Myth TV (http://www.mythtv.org/)is the best software out there to use under BSD. Wendey Seltzer actually used the program and make it fully functional. on here website you have full directions, drivers and programs to do it. http://wendy.seltzer.org/mythtv/ I myself am looking this for an option to build my own with a DVD recorder. IF serveral people are interested in this kind of project let me know, maybe we can share insight and idea.
  • by Chris Carollo ( 251937 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @01:58PM (#10320575)
    Their disadvantage is that HDTV can be quite the high-bandwidth application, and that means the limitations of the PCI bus, and even the AGP connection can sometimes cause quality loss.
    Not that I've ever experienced and I've been using a HiPix for years. HD isn't that high-bandwidth...it's only 19.2Mb/s, or 2.4MB/s. The standard 33Mhz PCI bus spec is for 133MB/s so there's plenty of headroom there.

    Far more of a concern is how fast you can write those bits to disk, though even there I've never had a problem.
  • by TheSync ( 5291 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @02:10PM (#10320746) Journal
    The real-time HD encoders used in the broadcast world cost around $50,000. It is a tough job to squish 1.2 Gbps down to under 20 Mbps and make it look good.

    Even the lamest quality HD MPEG-2 encoders on the HDV prosumer camcorders are at least several hundred dollars.
  • by kallistiblue ( 411048 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @02:16PM (#10320835) Homepage
    I spoke to one of the media contacts at Tivo and they said they would be happy to do an interview on my LCD tv [lcd-tv-reviews.com] site. The media contact said that she would be happy to connect me with any of their engineers.
    I would love to collect good questions for this Tivo Interview [lcd-tv-reviews.com]. Please feel free to visit the site and post your questions and I will do my best to get answers.
  • by CityZen ( 464761 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @02:31PM (#10321052) Homepage
    Satellite uses QPSK or ("turbo") 8PSK, not QAM.

    The QPSK is pretty standardized, whereas the 8PSK is still being tweaked by various parties for maximum bandwidth. Of course, most HDTV broadcasts use 8PSK.

    Once you get above the encoding layer, there's the encyption. The cable industry appears to have settled on cablecard as a means for standardizing the encryption setup (I think this may have been forced on them by the FCC).

    However, unlike in Europe, where satellite receivers have been standardized, US satellite systems are very proprietary, and even where they use international standards (Dish uses DVB and Nagra encryption), they will not let you subscribe using anything but their own proprietary hardware.
  • by dreadlocks ( 637491 ) on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @03:18PM (#10321654)
    LG-3410A (there is an older Zenith version also). This can record OTA HD, but apparently cannot playback while recording. It has active firewire ports for archiving to DVHS. I hear folks have put 300GB drives in them without fuss. Was $800, but now are $600ish.

    RCA-DVR10: this is a firewire only solution. two plugs: power and firewire. I hear it is unreliable, plus you can't buy them in a local shop. You should be able to daisy chain to DVHS.

    Firewire ain't that bad. To record HD, I go onto my integrated set, then tell the timer to record a show, it turns on the vcr, sends the show to the DVHS deck (mine was $90 at Best Buy) and turns it off. Again I have 2 cables: firewire and power. Yea, it's tape, but I'll spend $90 plus a few tapes (which can be found for much cheaper online than their "retail" prices) before I spend $600+ on a HD unit.

    I'm not that much on the bleeding edge. I'll wait for prices to come down and more features to be crammed in. PLUS, other units are coming that support cablecard. I can afford to be patient, as long as I can record the occasional HD show that I absolutely cannot miss.

    DVHS seems to be a stopgap technology ... ultimately the best thing would be to have a unit that records to a HDD and can archive to HD-DVD (or Blu-ray), that has integrated firewire for other units that may come along.

    Last thing: the article implied that the JVC deck should have been able to record over component video. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but recording an analog HD signal over component wires would require the signal to be (re)encoded in realtime to be recorded. This is $$$ for the chip, compared to just recording a straight digital signal.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 22, 2004 @06:55PM (#10324261)
    Not all the new features work, HMO in particular. It is worth doing just for folders though.

I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"

Working...