FCC Claims Regulatory Power Over Home Computers 406
Pointing to Assistant Professor of Law Susan Crawford's blog, iman1003 writes "The FCC has filed a brief where it claims regulatory power over all instrumentalities, facilities, and apparatus 'associated with the overall circuit of messages sent and received' via all interstate radio and wire communication according to a blog published by Susan Crawford. The blog can be found here and the brief here (in PDF format). Kind of scary if you ask me." Ars Technica has good commentary on this, also referencing Crawford's findings.
Their entire argument is fallacious at best (Score:5, Informative)
Uhhh, that's not the way the government works. A government agency must be given the authority to regulate by Congress, which is ultimately accountable to the People. A government agency can't just do whatever the hell they please just because they feel like it. They must have a mandate and be granted Congressional authority to do so.
Re:Shame (Score:0, Informative)
Whatever kind of man Colin Powell might have been, a man who lies to send his brothers in arms and other people's children to die is who he is now.
Re:Their entire argument is fallacious at best (Score:3, Informative)
WiFi aside, computer communication is more akin to telephones. It's point to point, so there is no way in which an individual node can crowd out everyone else... at least once it's plug being pulled.
This is a power grab. Pure and simple. Nevermind that the Supreme Court has ruled on this sort of thing before. (And not in the agency's favor mind you.)
Re:And why folk outside the US should care too (Score:2, Informative)
Re:voIP (Score:3, Informative)
THIS IS ZERO NEWS!! (Score:3, Informative)
If any of you have been PAYING ATTENTION to your computers, you will find that ALL of them have an FCC logo on them indicating that they have passed certifications. Every computer must pass under part 15 regs, and if it connects to a phone line, it must also pass under part 68 regs. Thus has it always been.
You want the FTC, not the FCC (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Their entire argument is fallacious at best (Score:2, Informative)
Re:THIS IS ZERO NEWS!! (Score:4, Informative)
ALL of them have an FCC logo
You mean the logo indicating that the equipment in question doesn't spew excessive EM interference? That's different. Apparently, the FCC wants to regulate the content of your communications.
Re:Their entire argument is fallacious at best (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Stupid power grab (Score:3, Informative)
HD has more that just presentation perks, it also comes with digital sound something over the air has been lacking. It also comes with show information and station information, something over the air has been missing. And there's something to say about playing halo2 or GTA SA in cinematic perspective, or course you want to get technical its really outputting 640p and not HDTV(720 or 1080i).
Whats lacking on HDTV are movies, a dvd(pseudo 640p) can't compare to the quality of a 1080i broadcasted movie. Killer product for HDTV will be HDDVD or bluray. I find i'm constantly rewatching movies I've seen on HBOHD because it is simply amazing.
The real problem with HDTV is that I used to watch no TV, no I find myself watching it, now my gf thinks i pay more attention to the tv then her. Nevermind what I said above, I really hate the HDTV. It sucks. Don't get one, because .. [Can't finish the message now, Surivor in HD Is on]