U.S. to Get New IP Czar 320
tetraminoe writes "Reuters is reporting that Congress's latest spending bill provides for the creation of a federal copyright enforcement czar. According to the article, 'Under the program, the president can appoint a copyright law enforcement officer whose job is to coordinate law enforcement efforts aimed at stopping international copyright infringement and to oversee a federal umbrella agency responsible for administering intellectual property law.' It also gives $2 million to the National Intellectual Property Law Enforcement Coordination Council (NIPLAC), created in the '90s and never funded. NIPLAC will work to protect American IP overseas and oversee enforcement."
Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Because we all know... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Potentially useful for USA, but... (Score:3, Informative)
I think that there should be only two precepts of international copyright law: 1) National treatment, i.e. that you treat foreigners the same as one's own people, and 2) Avoidance of conflicts so that obtaining a copyright in one place doesn't preclude you from being able to in some other place.
There should NOT be any minimum standards, however. If a country feels it is in its own best interests to have more copyright or less copyright than another, or no copyright at all, then that is a perfectly valid decision and should be respected.
So to answer your question, if China thinks it's okay to have cheap pirated copies of just-released or unreleased works, then I think that that's fine. It's their decision. We don't have to follow it, but by the same token, they shouldn't have to follow us.
I'm all for leveling the playing field and making sure that US companies and artists get compensated for their work.
The problem is that the level playing field is still in the advantage of the US and Europe basically, because it is up to their level. And anyway, why should other countries care if we make money? Let it be our concern, and let their law be their concern.
Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? (Score:4, Informative)
Geeks and Conservatives unite on P2P (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.conservative.org/pressroom/040920.asp [conservative.org]
Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? (Score:5, Informative)
You're a little of base there.
Originally Caesar was Julius Caesar's name, nothing more. It was later taken by his grand-nephew, Octavius the first Emperor, and later became a title.
This [wikipedia.org] Wikipedia article has some info.
You seem to be thinking of Consuls, the highest executive office in the Roman republic. The Caesers after Julius where Emperors, and ruled an empire, not a replublic.
Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar (Score:2, Informative)
Bruce Schneier points out that, if you're not going to search everybody, random searches are more secure than profiled searches.
Example: Suppose you have the resources to screen 20% of people coming through the airport. You can do this randomly or by a profile. If you select the victims randomly, then a Bad Guy has a 20% chance of getting caught no matter what. However, if you select the victims according to a profile, then if the Bad Guys learn what the profile is, and send someone through who does not fit the profile, they have a 0% chance of getting caught.
(Of course, he also points out that airport security is mostly security theater, there to make travelers feel safe and show Something Is Being Done).
Re:Finally (Score:2, Informative)
Still sound as good?