Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies Media

Harrison Ford Confirms Indiana Jones IV Production 495

phoric writes "According to TheIndyExperience.com, Harrison Ford has confirmed that his role in the much-rumored production of another Indiana Jones sequel is indeed true. However, he admits that future sequels may feature a younger actor, similar to the James Bond series post-Connery."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Harrison Ford Confirms Indiana Jones IV Production

Comments Filter:
  • A younger actor? (Score:0, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04, 2004 @01:39PM (#10996714)
    You mean, like, um, Mark Hamill? Dy-no-mite!
  • by Lu Xun ( 615093 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @01:40PM (#10996722)
    I don't know, Ford is Indiana to my mind; a new actor just wouldn't make sense to me. I wasn't around for the James Bond switchovers though.

    With the Indiana franchise I'd like to see a "Batman Beyond" switchover, with Ford as an aging Indy and some new disciple taking his place.

  • by kegwell ( 789687 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @01:40PM (#10996724)
    Didn't they learn their lesson the first time when they released "Young Indiana Jones". Don't get me wrong, Indiana Jones is my favorite series of movies, but there is a time when you need to put things to rest.
  • Dear god please... (Score:0, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04, 2004 @01:41PM (#10996734)
    ...do *not* introduce any new, goofy, CG characters or young sidekicks for "comedic relief." i'm sure this will follow other series and Hollywood's trend of blowing more shit up, blowing bigger shit up, another hot non-acting piece of eye-candy female sidekick, and hrm, what else? Oh right, some more poorly made pop tunes (or feel-cool psuedo-metal ala whatever piece of shit Vin has been in most recently). Damn, i hope they don't ruin this. Besides what else are we going to search for, the Shroud of Turin?
  • by whiteranger99x ( 235024 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @01:42PM (#10996739) Journal
    Not at all, I love making money. I just can't miss the opportunity to make (wise/dumb)ass remarks :)
  • Consider this. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04, 2004 @01:43PM (#10996743)
    Harrison Ford is 62 years old.
    Sylvester Stallone is 58 years old.
    Arnold Schwarzenegger is 57 years old.

    These guys were the primary action heroes while I was growing up. Man. Now _I_ feel old.
  • by Pflipp ( 130638 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @01:51PM (#10996794)
    With Bond, they were lucky to have Roger Moore, who already played The Saint. The character of the Saint is not very different to Bond's (especially within the hands of Moore, of course), so I guess that the audience could quite well get used to it.
  • by surelars ( 573834 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @01:53PM (#10996808)
    (Opps - title already used)

    Indy always was a dignified fellow, so there's no reason he can be the older professor, gray hair and all, saving the world. Heck, it worked for Connery - as Bond and as Indy's sidekick. I have no problem with at all with a 60+ Indy.

    Go for it.

  • by mosel-saar-ruwer ( 732341 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @01:58PM (#10996834)

    With the Indiana franchise I'd like to see a "Batman Beyond" switchover, with Ford as an aging Indy and some new disciple taking his place.

    A younger disciple, like, maybe, his son?

    Sean Connery as Grandpa Jones, Harrison Ford as Daddy Jones, and, I dunno, Hugh Jackman, or Leonardo DiCaprio, as Jones Jr? Maybe Karen Allen [the original Lost Ark love interest] as Mrs Jones?

    Of course, Steven Spielberg [having ditched Amy Irving for Kate Capshaw, of Temple of Doom fame], and Harrison Ford, having ditched a succession of wives for some damned whore from Ally McBeal, are probably not the kinds of guys to whom it might occur to portray fatherhood in a favorable light.

  • by ajs ( 35943 ) <{ajs} {at} {ajs.com}> on Saturday December 04, 2004 @01:59PM (#10996838) Homepage Journal
    "Didn't they learn their lesson the first time when they released "Young Indiana Jones"."

    Of course they did. You do realize that that was a highly successful series, right?
  • Sorry, No Way.... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by NormAtHome ( 99305 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:00PM (#10996849)
    I'm sorry but no one can replace Harison Ford as Indiana Jones, I just can't see any actor stepping into that role.
  • Re:it will die... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:04PM (#10996863)
    Lucas is allowed to be involved. In fact, he should be involved, he is a creative visionary.

    The caveat, though, is that someone or something has to be around to keep him on a leash. On the first trilogy he had small budgets and the actors were willing to talk back to him. He also didn't do all the writing and directing by himself. Nowadays he gets to control every aspect of the picture and nobody will tell him when he's wrong. It's not the best environment for his films.

  • by gad_zuki! ( 70830 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:22PM (#10996962)
    They can't decide between the hip-hop iPod wearing talking Nazi-experiment gone wrong talking moose or the kung-fu fighting reptile man.

    Some want his sidekick to be his cute younger daughter who will bring in more young males to the box office, but the studio is afraid to get an R-rating for "showing of the belly button" or "girl wearing tight t-shirt" in today's "moral" America.
  • by colmore ( 56499 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:23PM (#10996972) Journal
    Hey now. That was one of the best TV series ever. Don't disrespect.
  • Re:Consider this. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by iminplaya ( 723125 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:25PM (#10996975) Journal
    John Wayne is dead
    George Reeve is dead
    Buster Keaton is dead
    Johnny Weissmuller is dead

    These guys were the primary action heroes while I was growing up. There. Now you can feel young again :-)
  • by daniil ( 775990 ) * <evilbj8rn@hotmail.com> on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:41PM (#10997041) Journal
    Sean Connery was born in 1930. That didn't stop him from playing in The Rock in 1996, at the age of 66.
  • on the fence (Score:5, Insightful)

    by CAIMLAS ( 41445 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:45PM (#10997054)
    Man, I'm really on the fence on this one.

    On one hand, Harrison Ford is Indiana Jones. He's also Han Solo. You simply can't replace him in those roles, because everyone - everyone - associates the roles with the face, voice, and (most importantly) personality of Harrison Ford. Replacing Ford with someone else for the role of Indy just wouldn't work unless they tried really bloody hard to find some one with the same tongue-in-cheek sassy wit and lopsided grin - all without looking either too scholarly or two action-hero like. They'd need to find the "everyman intellectual" look, I think - as, it seems to me, Indy is the intellectual Ash.

    On the other hand, I'd really like to see more Indiana Jones films, as I grew up on the John Williams soundtracks for Indy, the witty quips, and such. Indiana Jones was, to a large degree, what motivated my interest in both history and archeology. I've got countless photos of both me and my brother dressed up in brown fedoras, kackis, and the closest thing we could find to a leather vest, while holding whips. It'd just make my toes tingle. Though, can they do as well a job on Indy 4 (and any further sequels) as they did on Indy 1 and 3? Indy 2 kinda stunk. Would they truly Bond-ify Indiana Jones, or would they do it in a respectable manner that made it cool?

    On still another hand, Indiana Jones relies on the Nazis to make him cool. Without Nazis or some massive empire of evil to fight that can be universally seen as evil, Indy has nothing. That doesn't make it easy to bring Indy to the current day - ala Bond. Maybe if they were to have a series of Chronicles, all placed in the WW2 era, it might work. But then there'd be a stronger need for Ford to play Dr. Jones.

    On still another hand, if you look at the Bond films, none of the James Bonds were as good as Connery except for maybe Brosnan. I'd argue that Connery is simply too cool for Bond, and that Brosnan does, in my mind, fit the Bond prototype image better - at least for modern day. I imagine the case may have been different in the 1950's. :) It seems that, to some degree, Bond may have been effeminated over the years - or at least since the 1980's - at least in appearance.

    Now, Harrison Ford's Indy was a "man's man". He drinks. He likes women. He doesn't like mindless women, and he likes them to remain quiet. He can take a beating while dishing one out. He's as sharp as a whip and can think inventively in times of need. He is, in a sense, an "idol", someone that almost every male can relate to on most levels, and still someone that can be looked up to. What I wonder is, in today's "progressive" society, would they bastardize the Indiana Jones character and take out all those character traits to make Indy more PC? They did so with Bond, to a large degree, and I do say the franchise suffered for it.

    Anyway, I could go on all day like this... I think I'll watch some Indiana Jones tonight. :P
  • by robyannetta ( 820243 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:52PM (#10997093) Homepage
    Sean Connery was born in 1930. That didn't stop him from playing in The Rock in 1996, at the age of 66.

    Just because Connery is eligible for Social Security, dosen't mean he's not a good actor.

    I just hope he keeps away from the sequel market in the future. It makes him look like he's selling out.

    I'd like to see Connery starring in new Branaugh 'Shakespeare' productions, tho. He's one of the best classically trained actors out there. Him AND Patrick Stewart.

  • by El Camino SS ( 264212 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @03:42PM (#10997340)

    Sure it is an action movie, but Indiana Jones is one of those characters that can be funny... ...an old rumor, years ago was that Spielberg wasn't going to do another Indiana Jones movie, then he got a spec script featuring a lot of old man jokes and humor in it as well as the action. A mature Jones, with mature problems, and still trying to be the adventurer that he remembers in his mind.

    I personally won't want to see an Indiana Jones movie with Ford in it unless it does make fun in some way his inability to get around anymore. If it doesn't, it will be a joke, and no one will believe it. It is part of where Harrison Ford is now. Better to surf the staples of adventure and humor in this one than do the opposite and try to make a stab at seriousness.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04, 2004 @03:49PM (#10997362)
    Jesus H Christ and his black brother Bart. You clowns have missed the perfect topical title:

    Indiana Jones And The Hunt For WMD's

  • by Taladar ( 717494 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @04:14PM (#10997517)
    It is a bad thing to ruin a good series of movies by making a bad sequel just for money.
  • by DourSalmon ( 728491 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @04:54PM (#10997734) Journal
    I'll say that trying to put women in typically male roles result in shitty movies (such as Tomb Raider) because they're so purely over the top and inplausable that it makes people groan in disbelief

    So Ellen Ripley in Aliens is what, some kind of an anomaly? In my opinion, the problem is not that women are in strong roles, it's tht often women are still used as sex-objects in those strong roles. it's kinda ridiculous when someone fighting nazis/aliens/zombies/whatever has to worry about her boobs popping out of an improbably small outfit. That is the problem with Xena and Tomb Raider and any number of other films, certainly. However there are examples of films featuring women in strong roles that doesn't seem oriented at the adolescent male masturbatory fantasy set.

    I should say that as a guy, I'm not totally opposed to the boob-pooping scenarios however.

  • Re:Yeah, okay. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Junior J. Junior III ( 192702 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @06:13PM (#10998160) Homepage
    Yeah, it's so annoying when they have an actor replace another actor. Like, there have only been 7 Hamlets in the whole of human history, and THAT'S SIX HAMLETS TOO FUCKING MANY! There should have only been ONE Hamlet, and when HE died, they should have stopped making Hamlet productions. This continual resurrection of Shakespeare bullshit is utterly shameless. Robbing the grave for yet another dollar, trotting out the same tired old remakes. The don't even bother writing up new scripts anymore, it's the SAME FUCKING PLAY, AGAIN! When WILL audiences learn?
  • by piper-noiter ( 772438 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @08:24PM (#10998780) Journal
    Well yes there is always a limit. I didn't demand that Khan take over the world just b/c its the 90's, James Bond to grow older, or Michael Jackson to stay black either. Still, I like it when things weave together so nice. (except for the eugenics war thing)

    And holiday specials never count.
  • by dr.badass ( 25287 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @08:43PM (#10998874) Homepage
    Harrison ford was born on 13 July 1942. That makes his 62.

    You gotta admit, for 62, the man looks pretty fucking good.

    Remember also that he was in his late 30s/early 40s when he was not just Indiana Jones, but also Han Solo, and Rick Deckard. The man is a badass.

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...