Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies Media

Harrison Ford Confirms Indiana Jones IV Production 495

phoric writes "According to TheIndyExperience.com, Harrison Ford has confirmed that his role in the much-rumored production of another Indiana Jones sequel is indeed true. However, he admits that future sequels may feature a younger actor, similar to the James Bond series post-Connery."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Harrison Ford Confirms Indiana Jones IV Production

Comments Filter:
  • by amigoro ( 761348 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @01:39PM (#10996718) Homepage Journal
    IESB.net: Is Indy 4 still going to be made? Ford: "No doubt about it." IESB.net: Could a younger actor play Indiana Jones in Indy 4? Ford: "No problem, but Indy IV is mine." Ford also added that he wouldn't mind having a younger actor play Indy in future films, which is similar to what was done with the James Bond films after Sean Connery left. IESB.net: Will you be doing your own stunts for Indiana Jones 4? Ford: "At least some of them."

    Harrison ford was born on 13 July 1942. That makes his 62. So we are going to have a 62-year-old man doing Indiana Jones stunts. Mr. Ford must be one fit senior citizen.


    Moderate this comment
    Negative: Offtopic [mithuro.com] Flamebait [mithuro.com] Troll [mithuro.com] Redundant [mithuro.com]
    Positive: Insightful [mithuro.com] Interesting [mithuro.com] Informative [mithuro.com] Funny [mithuro.com]

  • Re:This Just in.... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by nkh ( 750837 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @01:48PM (#10996782) Journal
    And this times, with twice more nazis butchered and decapitated than previously shown on screen!

    Seriously, this is great news to me that Ford will continue for a last movie. Of course the "young Indy" will fail miserably but it doesn't really matter, the Indiana Jones franchise was almost dead anyway, a last movie with Harrison Ford is greatly appreciated.
  • by sagefire.org ( 731545 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:00PM (#10996845) Homepage
    Have you ever noticed that Regeneration episodes are among the best episodes of Doctor Who [bbc.co.uk]?

    It's interesting that we all say, "No! Only Harrison can ever be Indy!" but people have no problem with Tom Baker being replaced by Peter Davison, then Colin, then Sylvester, etc...

    I think more Indy movies will fail (though this one may pull an audience like Connery did in Never Say Never Again [imdb.com]) not due to anything having to do with Mr. Ford.

    When Spielberg made the Indy movies, he was reviving the Saturday serials of distant movie lore. He had a sense of nostalgia and a sense of love for the project. After seeing some recent Speilberg work, I don't think he is capable of the innocent fervor needed to cut a successful Indy movie together.

  • by sheemwaza ( 570202 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:03PM (#10996860) Homepage Journal
    I am intrigued... This series always used the Nazis as bad guys, which always worked out well. Now, if they play to his age as opposed to ignoring it, they can set the films in the early cold war. Think about it -- Russians, nuclear bombs, espionage. Not necessarily standard IJ fare, but interesting nonetheless.
  • I'd really like an adaptation of "Indiana Jones and the fate of Atlantis" for the widescreen.

    That game ROCKED. And don't worry about previous videogame adaptations. Those were usually action games adapted with a sucky story. Here we're talking about a game which is ACTUALLY a story.
  • by reallocate ( 142797 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:17PM (#10996930)
    It wasn't advancing age that prompted Connery to leave Bond behind.

    Connery is currently 74. He retired from the Bond franchise after "You Only Live Twice" in 1967, when he was 37. He played Bond again, at 53, in 1983's "Never Say Never Again".

    I suspect that if Connery had stood to be paid as much as Ford gets paid to do Indiana Jones, his willingess to play Bond would have increased accordingly.
  • by catbertscousin ( 770186 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:48PM (#10997068)
    I work for a small production company. While we have a fair sized group of mid-twenties gaffers, and grips, and PA's to do the "grunt work", the core people never fail to amaze me. Our still photographer is in his mid-sixties, an avid hiker, and runs two miles a day on his lunch break. Our senior engineer is also in his sixties, and was out lugging cables in the woods last summer dispite a knee replacement two months previously. Our DP is over seventy, and can lug fully loaded film camera cases further than I, a mid-twenties 2ndAC, can. Our Director, in his early sixties, has been known to climb trees, carry arc lights up small mountains, and help push a stuck generator trailer out of three inch deep mud. They can also work longer nights than we young'uns can, and be fresher and more alert while the rest of us are stumbling around like zombies. Fit senior citizens are not to be ignored, IMHO.
  • by Basehart ( 633304 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @02:54PM (#10997105)
    Yes, Roger Moore slipped into 007's shoes very nicely. I really liked Moore as bond. Almost as good as Connery and Brosnan in the ruthless bastard department.

    I am worried about the proposed successor [bbc.co.uk] to Brosnan though.
  • Re:it will die... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anubis350 ( 772791 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @03:06PM (#10997171)
    how about playing his own father or uncle or something? Lucaas did this with Lukes uncle owen, who plays his own father in the prequels. Not to mention he couldve played an entirely different character. I'm not saying Ford's presence would have saved the new trilogy by itself, but an actor of ford's credentials could afford to stand up to lucas and try to stop some of his more terrible ideas (like jar-jar). As a previous poster has said, its not that lucas shouldnt have been involved (he did create it after all), he just needs someone to keep his visions in check. An actor like ford would have managed that
  • by spagthorpe ( 111133 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @03:21PM (#10997240)
    Most people don't know that Roger Moore (born 1927) was actually older than Sean Connery (born 1930) by three years. Was a shock to me as well at the time I found out. I had always assumed that Roger Moore was Connery's younger replacement.
  • by CAIMLAS ( 41445 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @03:23PM (#10997245)
    No, that would suck. And I'm saying that as a head-strong, chauvenistic white male. Here's why.

    I love the Indiana Jones films. I love the "history" twist, the Indiana Jones attitude (which I mention here [slashdot.org]), and just the general premise of being Indiana Jones myself (yes, even at 22, I have such fantasies. Call me a child, I dare you.) Indiana Jones is a character that many men idealize and idolize - the typical male hero.

    Say what you want about there needing to be more "strong female characters" in movies. I'll say that trying to put women in typically male roles result in shitty movies (such as Tomb Raider) because they're so purely over the top and inplausable that it makes people groan in disbelief. Indiana Jones (Raiders) had a strong female lead: she was tough as nails, sassy, and could hold her own in most cases - except for when Indy rescued her. Granted, you might see that as a 'weakness' but Indy had weakness too - being sentimental and having a fear of snakes - so it definately wasn't a "males are superior" portrayal.

    Now, if you want to have an Indiana Jones film with a strong female supporting character, I'm all fine with that. If you want strong female leads, look to shit like Xena, Tomb Raider, and other such improbable characters. Indiana Jones is about a male archeologist who has the role of "hero" fighting Nazis. I'd be fine with another supporting female such as a daughter, ala Marion, because she was a believeable character, and those are generally the best kind. When you recommended a "strong leading female" all I could think of was a) Tomb Raider and b) the "This is UNIX, I know this!" girl in Jurassic Park, and it scared me because those characters were poorly conceived.

    Personally, I envision Indiana Jones 4 being a Grandfather-Father-Son type paragidm, with someone else playing the main action hero - as the son. Maybe make the son a research paeleontologist - or something like that - with a wild streak (similar to Indy's). Maybe he despises his father's and grandfather's work because it caused distance between them. Let's say he goes to a family reunion, and Dad and Grandpa try nad pull him into a search for some ancient lost artifact (let's say it's 1950 or so). There's still potential there for Nazis (or bloody commies! they're easy to demonize too!), and there's a chance to both "pass the torch" to a new Dr. Jones and to develop his character, as well as have a good story with both Indiana Jones and his son.

    Now, I think the real challenge in this scenario would be finding a person to play the role that is both manly, witty/sarcastic, and charismic. It's hard to find someone that could 'act' that role without at least sharing the traits (Johny Depp or Orlando Bloom? No, I don't think so. While great actors, they're only human and not the type at all). Off hand, I can't think of anyone that's a known entity in Hollywood who would be good for the role, at all. Maybe they'll turn up a yet-unknown tallent, and we'll have an honest-to-goodness resurgence of acton films again. There does not seem to be too many manly male actors in Hollywood over the last couple years.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04, 2004 @03:26PM (#10997260)
    Maybe YOU had no problem with Tom being replaced by Peter who was replaced by Colin, but it godamn pissed ME off. Here I am, totally used to Tom and they off him. So along comes Peter and I eventually get used to him -and they off him!

    And then comes Colin whom I never liked. Somewhere in there, I stopped watching and discovered there was more to do in life and never looked back. I have no idea who took over after Colin and I don't care. I learned from that to never, ever let a TV show or network toy with me. When they air bullshit, I change the channel. When a suckass show comes on, I find something else to watch.

    That whole Dr. Who thing has made me incredibly critical of everything I see on TV and at the movies.
  • Give it up (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Wes Janson ( 606363 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @04:01PM (#10997439) Journal
    As good as Indiana Jones is, there always comes a time when it's necessary to just let it go. The original movies were, are, and will continue to be classics. Creating more films in an attempt to replicate the success of the first ones, will never succeed. There's no way a replacement could ever be found for Harrison Ford, and even if there was, there's no similar replacement for the Nazis. The Russians belong to Bond. Quite frankly, everything exists in a specific time and place, and the window of opportunity for Indiana Jones has probably already expired. You only have so much time in which you can continue the series and have them remain relevent. Fifty years from now, will the next generation appreciate and enjoy the original Indiana Jones films like we do now? After a hundred years, the threat of Nazism will have diminished greatly in the minds of most the world. To sum it all up, I think trying to continue the IJ franchise is a losing battle from the start-impossible to do successfully, and eventually worthless even if accomplished.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04, 2004 @04:03PM (#10997457)
    Uhhh... so, you didn't care about William Hartnell, Patrick Troughton, or Jon Pertwee (who Baker replaced)?

    Just because Baker was the most popular with the longest run didn't mean they started that whole "regeneration" thing with him. You non-fans shouldn't bother posting about what you don't understand.

    But, I suppose if they enforced "understanding" as a pre-req to posting on /., there'd be very little activity. ;)
  • by Lord_Dweomer ( 648696 ) on Saturday December 04, 2004 @04:06PM (#10997477) Homepage
    Hey, if he can pull it off, more power to him. He's one of the few actors who piss me off these days, and has always been about making good films.

  • by Reteo Varala ( 743 ) <{moc.sotnoilsorpmal} {ta} {oeter}> on Saturday December 04, 2004 @05:53PM (#10998057)
    Dr. Who, however, is pure science fiction.

    Indiana Jones is a historical fiction with a touch of fantasy.

    Personally, I think that it would be better to create a new character in this particular film that would produce his own spinoff series, and continue the "Archaeologist vs. Nazi" saga in there. This way, he won't need to try and fit Indiana Jones' shoes, and create a character all his own, while still sharing continuity with the Indiana Jones universe.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 04, 2004 @05:54PM (#10998061)
    No, he probably just wasn't old enough to remember Hartnell, Troughton or Pertwee. Exactly the same position I'm in.

    I'm not a Doctor Who fanatic nowadays, but I liked it when I was a kid, and out of curiosity and boredom, I was flicking through Google's Usenet archive. And I read something, which made me think...

    There are people out there who will *only* be able to remember Sylvester McCoy (the last regular Doctor) episodes from the first time around. There are people for whom McCoy is *their* Doctor, remembered through vague childhood memories, and most of those people will now be old enough to be leaving university (if they haven't already left). Maybe someone a bit older than them remembers Sylvester McCoy's "regeneration" as their first. Should they be expected to rigidly list all the previous regenerations?
  • Hmmm (Score:2, Interesting)

    by rofthorax ( 722179 ) on Sunday December 05, 2004 @02:43AM (#11000193)
    They have the technology they should do
    and Indiana Jones movie that is computer generated..
    Then they can reuse Harrison Ford's Mannerisms
    and movements, and he can still act, no
    matter how old he gets.. Then he will have no excuse
    but to star int he movies.

The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood

Working...