Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Television Media

Inside TechTV/G4 404

An anonymous reader writes "Former G4TechTV employee, Dan Huard, blows the whistle on G4. In the last half of his article, he states that TSS manufactured questions and used 'ringers' to ask their questions on the show."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Inside TechTV/G4

Comments Filter:
  • by ravenspear ( 756059 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:05PM (#11234374)
    Leo was the only person giving TSS any semblance of watchability. When he left the whole thing spiraled down the toilet fairly quickly. Even before then, a lot of the unique tech content that made TSS cool at the beginning had started to be replaced with useless fluff.
  • by ChairmanMeow ( 787164 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:12PM (#11234405) Journal
    I haven't watched TechTV since it was bought out by G4, and, to be honest, I don't intend to start. It was excellent before the takeover, but afterwards, the focus changed, and it became clear that the new management didn't want the "geeks" that watched TechTV. So be it. But don't expect me to watch G4/TechTV anymore.
  • by human bean ( 222811 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:20PM (#11234443)
    The purpose of a media company is to make money selling product and promoting the owner's point of view. This, in turn, means that viewer share is paramount, and that if you have to "fix" the content to get more viewer share, so be it.

    Viewers do not want reality. They get enough of it from work, raising children, the tax man, and the world in general. They want to associate, identify, and forget the crummy world they had to endure most of the day. The masses want Disney, okay?

    You should always remember a media business truism: "The public are morons". Media types will never say this out where you can hear them, but I have sat through enough conference room discussions to know where these folks land. The reason for this is simple. In the great statistical average of the world, it's true. As much as you would have it otherwise.

    It is said that only one person out of thirty creates art, literature, science, or policy. Skip media. Hang around those folks instead. Become one of them. We need all we can get.

    Yes, I consider the Internet to be media now...
  • by Create an Account ( 841457 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:21PM (#11234450)
    I don't think people are shocked that it happened, but I do think it's good to get the straight scoop about how the situation evolved.

    As a moderately geeky business major, I see this as a management failure, so having this story helps me understand how not to screw up something good. If some geeky broadcast majors read this article, maybe they can help prevent some other geeky goodness from failing later.

    Just my two cents worth.
  • Re:Not surprised. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rednip ( 186217 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:21PM (#11234452) Journal
    All that's left is good-looking, young hosts who don't know jack about what they are talking about.
    Sounds like a typical layoff cycle. First you get rid of all the people who quietly get their work done, but don't kiss the ass of the right people, then the rest of the good workers start seeing a sinking ship and bolt. After that all you got left are the kiss-ass, blame layers, who make it their job do drive off anyone good left. Nothing new here...
  • by steeleye_brad ( 638310 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:23PM (#11234455)
    Bingo. It seems very few people acknowledge this. Leo was one of the few people on TechTV who appeared to actually have some training and experience in live television. Jittery nerds do not make good TV...case in point is Chris Pirillo. I don't why people thought he was good, that man just wasn't made for live TV.

    I haven't watched TechTV since it became G4TechTV (god damn what a terrible name). It is a shame Comcast has essentially dissolved TechTV, the end result of this merger was G4 getting a few new people and some new shows (many of which are now gone!).
  • Re:basic questions (Score:4, Insightful)

    by cqnn ( 137172 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:30PM (#11234481)
    G4 is a network aimed at the video game (console and PC) markets.
    They were merged with TechTV to take advantage of the greater audience
    availability that channel had gained.

    TSS is an acronym for The ScreenSavers. An end-user oriented Tech News,
    commentary, tips, call-in and variety show that was the flagship program
    for the defunct network.

    We cared because back in the day, while TSS did reflect much of the Windows-centric
    viewpoint of much of the computer industry, they were also a positive and active source
    of news and information about OSS, Linux, Windows Alternatives, Windows Security and
    functional issues; and keeping an open mind about users choices in use (and abuse)
    of technology.

  • Fake question (Score:0, Insightful)

    by edittard ( 805475 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:30PM (#11234483)
    "he states that TSS manufactured questions and used 'ringers' to ask their questions on the show"

    A slashdot story (from michael the censorware killer, no less) complaining about journalistic integrity! Oh the irony.

  • Re:Not surprised. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by simm_s ( 11519 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:32PM (#11234489) Homepage
    This is a subtle point, when Hitler segragated the Jews from German society, the German's lost a talented pool of scientists and engineers. It's a good analogy; IMHO!
  • Re:techtv (Score:3, Insightful)

    by linebackn ( 131821 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:35PM (#11234502)
    It's because comcast is evil.

    Before they bought out TechTV and it was doing so well they kept bumping it up to only be included on the more expensive plans. One day I changed to tech TV and all I got was "not authorized" until I agreed to pay more money. I only fell for for that once and then the next time I told them to screw it.

    After they killed TechTV by buying it up and merging it with their crap clone G4 they left in on the more expensive plan expecting people would still want it that much. WRONG!
  • Re:Unfortunately (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Catbeller ( 118204 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:35PM (#11234504) Homepage
    Everyone at TechTV saw it coming. Some just had options ready, some couldn't leave immediately. When you're 48 and accomplished, there are doors awaiting, even if you have to make them yourself. A 21 year old has to ride the wave. Not many tech television jobs around.
  • by sixy ( 516428 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:39PM (#11234529)
    To the geeks here I say, "Boycott G4 and their sponsers. Write letters to the sponsers. Boycott their lame message boards. Spread the word far and wide."
    I'd actually have to watch the shows to know who the sponsors were.
  • by daniil ( 775990 ) * <evilbj8rn@hotmail.com> on Saturday January 01, 2005 @03:50PM (#11234588) Journal
    I hate to say this, but you're preaching to the wrong choir. Because if you haven't noticed, then Slashdot is rolling down the same hill. News for Nerds? Get real. Most of these "news" come from mainstream sources such as ABC, New York Times and BBC. Most of the people reading (and posting to) Slashdot just fancy themselves nerds, as being a nerd is cool.
  • by khasim ( 1285 ) <brandioch.conner@gmail.com> on Saturday January 01, 2005 @04:01PM (#11234637)
    If your KPIs & hence performance bonus depended on screwing it up, you'd screw it up. That or you've chosen the wrong subject to study.
    It's possible to make a decision not to go with the maximum profit so you can maintain a loyal audience.

    But you won't be there forever. When you move on, the next person will most likely pillage your audience for the maximum profit/lowest cost.

    I think that's what was shown in the original article. While the show was under control of TechTV, it was good. After the buyout/merger, it sucked.
  • At one time... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by vwjeff ( 709903 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @04:07PM (#11234671)
    the Screen Savers were the only show on TV that would come close to taking about technology. Where else on TV would you hear Linux mentioned as well as a live install (as Megan did on a show) They would often mention programs that I had never heard of and I would go download them. The first time I heard of Knoppix was on The Screensavers. Hell, they even had Taco in for an interview. (The last good thing they did after the merger)

    I once loved watching the show but now I can't. The new hosts are all about gaming, gaming, gaming.
  • Even X-Play Sucks (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Go Aptran ( 634129 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @04:19PM (#11234711)
    The last few times I dared watch X-Play (about a month ago), I noticed that the show went from criticism, to showing cinematics and previews of upcoming games. Opinions seem to have been removed from the show. It was like a series of commercials interrupted by lame banter.

    At least Morgan was still hot... but that's just not enough anymore, so I tuned out forever.

    Well done Comcast...
  • by daniil ( 775990 ) * <evilbj8rn@hotmail.com> on Saturday January 01, 2005 @04:20PM (#11234718) Journal
    Ack. You weren't supposed to take it literally.

    See, we're talking about two different things here. Two different persons. One is the nerd and the other is the image of a nerd. Actually being a nerd might not be cool, but being a "nerd" is, just like it's cool to be "green" and so on. Reading Slashdot and watching gaming programmes is a part of the image.

  • by pappy97 ( 784268 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @04:21PM (#11234728)
    I think it is pretty clear that Comcast wanted to make use the TechTV trademark (because it's popularity was growing) to promote G4.

    Furthermore, I think it's cleat that Comcast has intentionally alienated hardcore TechTV viewers.

    I have had people who work in TV tell me that nobody tries to alienate any viewers, but I think it is more than clear that G4 wants TechTV viewers out and replace them with an MTV crowd.

    Want evidence of this? Look at the commercials. Gone are the cadillac commercials. Insert the goofy video game commercials, and some really stupid (dumbed down) computer hardware commercials. I saw an nViDiA commercial that actually explained what a GPU was!

    I figured such a commercial was more non-tech channel worthy, but when you consider G4 is driving out tech-oriented viewers for MTV gamers, these "dumb" commericals are quite appropo.
  • by Create an Account ( 841457 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @04:24PM (#11234744)
    I don't want to start an argument here, so please forgive me for seeming pedantic.

    I would respectfully suggest that if your performance indicators and performance bonuses are encouraging behaviors that result in your show going off the air, or losing your core audience without creating a similarly robust replacement, then you are using the wrong indicators. So, maybe the management failure is not in the control booth. Maybe it's in the front office, or in the corporate headquarters.

    If the financial requirements cause you to degrade the quality of your product, then either your product is not ready for the market (or vice versa) or you have not been sufficiently creative in your market planning. Bringing the business side and the 'entertainment' side together is the job of management.

    At least, that's the way the schools I attend teach it. Anyway, thanks for listening.
  • by blixel ( 158224 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @04:27PM (#11234758)
    Does anyone really care that the calls were scripted/easy/whatever? I know I didn't. Actually the live calls have always been my least favorite part of TechTV. 2 to 3 minutes of complete boredom. You just simply can't answer an "interesting" question in the time they are allotted for live calls.

    In reading Dan's article, I was actually surprised to learn that the calls were ever pseudo-live at all. I started watching TechTV back when it was still ZDTV and The Screen Savers was a 90 minute show. Even back then I assumed the live calls were spoon fed. To me it always seemed natural that it would have to be that way. The only way you could take a live call of the cuff would be to just have someone call in and chime in with a 20 second opinion about something like they do on Talk Radio.

  • by Hognoxious ( 631665 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @04:35PM (#11234816) Homepage Journal
    If the financial requirements cause you to degrade the quality of your product, then either your product is not ready for the market (or vice versa) or you have not been sufficiently creative in your market planning. [...] At least, that's the way the schools I attend teach it. Anyway, thanks for listening.
    Do they also teach you the difference between short-term and long-term? And that one can improve profits in the former at a cost of totally bollocking-up the latter? Don't worry, it's probably coming up in year 2.
  • by blixel ( 158224 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @04:41PM (#11234853)
    Bingo. It seems very few people acknowledge this. Leo was one of the few people on TechTV who appeared to actually have some training and experience in live television. Jittery nerds do not make good TV...

    Bingo. The part I find "funny" though is all the geek elitists think that just because a person puts on a smile and speaks fluently in a way that normal people can comprehend that the TV Show and/or person is "clueless" or whatever.

    I really liked watching Leo and Patrick. I thought they had a nice balance of TV presence and intelligence. I hate all the slashbots that would bash ZDTV/TechTV as being a show for morons. Get over yourselves.

    How interesting would it be to watch a completely introverted super nerd with a squeaky voice stumble and stutter every word while he's standing there on live TV staring at his shoe laces because he's too withdrawn to look at the camera.

    I liked the format of ZDTV/TechTV ... I thought it was interesting and yes, even informative at times.

    I don't like what the network has become. G4TechTV or whatever. I believe they are actually just calling it G4TV now because they don't want anything to do with Tech. But I don't hate the network because I'm so full of myself that I can't enjoy watching a "remedial" television show. I hate the network because they have completely gotten rid of everything tech related.

    But have you seen the programming lately? It's ALL games. One or two shows about games is cool .. I like a game every now and then and like to hear opinions and stay abreast about the latest games. But holy crap ... it's 24/7 video games now. And it's not even interesting to watch. Who wants to watch an hour of video game cut scenes ala Cinematech? Do we really need 3 different shows about video game reviews? Do we really need an entire show dedicated to video game cheat codes?
  • by cqnn ( 137172 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @04:42PM (#11234856)
    You didn't watch enough. That was probably one
    of the theme episodes they occasionally did even
    when it was on TechTV.

    X-Play is one of the few things that seems to
    have improved (with opinions and critisism intact) since the merger.
  • Re:Hypocrisy. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 01, 2005 @04:45PM (#11234865)
    So, so true, and yet the powers that be that run this website will never allow this truth to be told in any way. Slashdot is runned by complete hypocrits.
  • by 0racle ( 667029 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @04:45PM (#11234867)
    There used to be several channels like this, PBS, Discovery, National Geographic, I remember watching a 2-3 hour Nova special on Voyager 2 and that was the greatest thing I had ever seen, the rose and superball in liquid nitrogen was quite good too. The nice thing was that when they appealed to people who wanted to know, they had shows that went in depth, and others that were more for those who were interested but didn't have the time to get all of the background before hand.

    Guess what, that type of TV station doesn't make money now, its not what the majority want. Personally I never thought very highly of TechTV ever anyway and I don't see how you can call it in depth coverage, it was a glossing over of everything just as much as the evening news is and I don't understand what everyones love affair with the cast members is but format failed and went where it has for the same reason Discovery plays that god awful monster garage and National Geographic has reality shows, that format makes far more money then appealing to a small segment of the population.
  • by 2TecTom ( 311314 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @05:10PM (#11234980) Homepage Journal
    who is it protecting him?

    who is really calling the shots at G4?

    why is such incompetence allowed to continue?

    why is it the same at every big company I've worked for?

    why can't anyone in management actually effectively manage?

    sadly, it seems that power corrupts, and the corrupt are crappy in power
  • by Detritus ( 11846 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @06:11PM (#11235258) Homepage
    They've run a number of show dedicated to previews, but they still do a lot of reviews. For any given game, it usually appears on the show once as a preview (beta version) and once as a review (release version). They aren't shy about trashing bad games, which is something I appreciate. I've seen too many gamer magazines and web sites that rarely give anything a bad review.
  • Re:Depressing... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Shadow99_1 ( 86250 ) <theshadow99@gma[ ]com ['il.' in gap]> on Saturday January 01, 2005 @07:26PM (#11235513)
    I was never a Leo fan, but I'd just adjusted to the first road of changes when they added the 'guy I can't remember the name of' to cohost with Kevin with Dan, Yoshi, and Sarah backing them up. Now it's Chi-Lan, that other guy from G4 who hardly seems to know what a PC is (edit: Kevin Pereira I guess, now that I looked it up) , Kevin and Sarah... Personally I think Diane Mizota has more personality than Chi-Lan or for that matter the girls that did G4tv.com (Tina Wood and Laura Foy). Any of those would have been better choices, but I'm taking a wild guess and saying they all turned down the chance to be on TSS...

    I was never a big TechTV fan, but TSS was a fairly good view while eating lunch and safe viewing material for people like my parents who might not understand everything on the show, but got a fair education into subjects they wouldn't have before... Now I'm back to telling people to avoid the whole channel, it's rather sad...
  • Re:Boo for G4 (Score:3, Insightful)

    by bani ( 467531 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @08:50PM (#11235775)
    bonnie hammer destroyed the scifi channel, turning it into a stupid horror/pyschic channel aimed at housewives. but at least they occasionally ran some good series.

    then scifi cancelled farscape.

    then those fucks at g4 destroyed techtv.

    so I cancelled cable. when they asked why, i told them - scifi and techtv had gone to shit.

    why pay $40/mo on cable when you can buy an entire season of episodes for $40, commercial free, on dvd, and watch them when you want and not when the networks dictate you should watch them? (yes i know you can dvr your channels, but buying dvd box sets is still cheaper, and better quality.)
  • And...SO?? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by BRSQUIRRL ( 69271 ) on Saturday January 01, 2005 @09:21PM (#11235895)
    Who cares? Any outrage about this is completely missing the point: Screen Savers is a lost cause.

    I remember religously watching Computer Chronicles with Stewart Cheifet when I was younger. I also used to watch TSS regularly; I even upgraded my cable package to one that included ZDTV just for the show. It was (although at times a bit basic) funny, informative, etc.

    I lost track of the show when they moved to L.A. and got rid of Pat and Leo. I turned it on a week or so ago just to see what was going on these days...just in time for an insightful discussion about the word "scrotum", complete with snorting and giggling from the new adolescent "hosts"...and a new set that looks like something that a 7 year old would come up with if you asked them to imagine their dream playroom.

    Thanks, Comcast...thanks for not only failing to recognize quality TV, but apparently actively setting out to flush it down the toilet.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 01, 2005 @11:23PM (#11236254)
    Are you kidding? Comcast didn't want the freaking Tech TV trademark! They wanted TechTV's satellite slots on Dish and DirecTV, because G4 had been trying to get carried for 2+ years and could not do it. Flat out failed.

    So they bought TechTV for roundabout $300 million and got the satellite feeds they said they had to have to survive.

    The whole G4-TechTV combo name thing was for two purposes. Most of the satellite services have contracts that allow them to drop a channel if it changes in a significant way. Going all gaming would have triggered the contract and allowed Dish and DirecTV to pull the plug. After spending $300M, Comcast was not about to let that happen.

    Dish and DirecTV bitched and complained anyway. Neither one was happy about this. Dish owns some of the TechTV stock, and DirecTV was onboard with ZDTV when it launched because THEY believed in it. It hurt them so see Comcast come in but ... Comcast did some dealing and managed to save the deal.

    The other trick was keeping the viewers from both channels and getting them to watch the combo channel. They've pretty much blown it there which is why the ratings suck ass.

    Hint: shows about drifting are not going to fix it.
  • by blaberski ( 215844 ) on Sunday January 02, 2005 @03:38AM (#11237205)
    What kind of BS thinking is that? I could probably say you might have an argument (and that's a big might btw) about Kevin, but saying that Pat and Leo were up to a bunch of shenanigans because the company that they were once employed by was bought by another company that then ran the bought company into the ground, is just plain stupid.

    Think of it this way, you work for company A, Huge company B buys Company A, you not liking what you are seeing about Company B leave. That Company then fires pretty much everyone that was associated with Company A. Company B is then shown to be a bunch of liars and thieves. Does that make you a liar too, when you were never part of Company B?

    Now onto the kevin situation. From all that I read Kevin wants to get out of G4, but he is bound by a contract. Several times he has posted things that are not flattering about G4 on his blog, which have strangely disappeared later (guess who ordered that one). I get the feeling that Kevin wants out, he even gave up hosting the show (or he was pressured, no way of knowing for sure).

    So in short you have an argument that G4 has done shady things, hell I would agree with you. But as of this point you have no proof at all that TechTV did anything shady, all you have is unsubstantiated conjecture.
  • by blaberski ( 215844 ) on Sunday January 02, 2005 @03:45AM (#11237237)
    To be honest I don't recall him ever doing that. They have on occasion brought up a site on the big screen, and pointed to a certain passage on a site. Most of the time they mention the site, as for the rest of the time it is probably just live TV screwups that happen.

    I think on of your last sentence is probably the closes thing to being right. TechTV, and the people that worked for it (while not perfect or a saint) did try to do the right thing. G4 seems to go out of their way to be underhanded.

Ya'll hear about the geometer who went to the beach to catch some rays and became a tangent ?

Working...