CNN Cancels Crossfire 182
blonde rser writes "Three months after Jon Stewart
appeared on (and lambasted) CNN's Crossfire the
Globe and Mail reports that CNN is dumping Tucker Carlson. It appears that Crossfire is being canceled and Carlson's contract is not being renewed. As to whether Stewart's opinion had any affect on the decision there is this quote from Jonathan Klein, CEO of CNN's US network:
'I guess I come down more firmly in the Jon Stewart camp.'"
How did Carlson land that job anyways? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm curious though. What's his background that earned him the spot on a show like Crossfire? He had to have done something that made him in the spotlight in some way before that I would assume?
Re:How did Carlson land that job anyways? (Score:5, Insightful)
Alex.
I doubt the sincerity of that comment! (Score:5, Insightful)
I saw Jon Stewart on Crossfire and from what I could gather from his rant, he objected to the institution of Republicans and Democrats yelling slogans from their talking points list, and pretending it's debate... and then pretending that reports like "Democrats claim X; Republicans claim Y" is news. So what if Crossfire is over. Everything that JS freaked out about is absolutely at the foundation of the way CNN reports. Crossfire is just reveals that formula in an especially naked way. So I don't understand how somebody could agree with JS and still be CEO of CNN-USA.
Re:Thank God they're getting rid of Tucker (Score:2, Insightful)
Props to Jon Stewart (Score:4, Insightful)
A good start (Score:0, Insightful)
Re:How did Carlson land that job anyways? (Score:2, Insightful)
I wouldn't be surprised. Crossfire is not a political analysis or debate show. It's a performance show. It's entertainment. Civil, objective and rational debate is not the point of Crossfire.
Civil debate is great and all, but it's not entertainment. It's not exciting. It doesn't reach out to you, Joe Viewer, and grab you. It doesn't have you on the edge of your seat. It simply doesn't make Great Television.
People watch Crossfire for the personalities and the performance. It's as much as a performing art as anything else. It's essentially the performance art of rhetoric. And it's quite entertaining.
That's why I listen to Rush Limbaugh, after all. I may disagree with half the things he says, but I'm still a dittohead. He's one hell of a broadcaster.
It's Official (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Bowtie (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:CNN is dead (Score:3, Insightful)
I know, I'm feeding the troll. But I don't have a problem with opinions I disagree with. I have a problem when opinions become news. News should be about reporting facts, investigating, digging for information, and expert analysis. When it becomes opinion from one party line or from two party lines, both are terrible.
Re:Thank God they're getting rid of Tucker (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm a conservative, and there are genuine issues that we can differ with the president on but a socialist agenda? Come on man!
LK
Re:Bowtie (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Thank God they're getting rid of Tucker (Score:3, Insightful)
Crossfire's purpose is to make Ted Turner more money. That's CNN's purpose. That's about all news' purpose. That's why pretty much all news channels have gotten so horrible over the years. The only news on the television that isn't a sensationalistic joke is Fox News. Fox News, unfortunately, is just as bad or worse because it's purpose is to bring right-wing views and opnions to the people.
Re:Tucker on PBS, Jon S (Score:1, Insightful)
Understand this if you never understand anything else. CNN, FoxNews, MSNBC, CNBC, et al have shows on their network that ARE NOT news programs. Got it? You braindead geeks have to understand the difference between "news" and "commentary".
Re:Bowtie (Score:3, Insightful)
The problem with modern American politics, on both sides of the issue, is that if you are on one of the extremes, you're so far from the other side that the center LOOKS like the other side. Talk to a left-wing tree hugger, and CNN is the right wing anti-immigrant hatred network. Talk to a right wingnut- and CNN becomes a bastion of liberal and socialist tendencies. Therefore CNN is indeed the center.
I guess that the daily show wouldn't work if they got someone who was actually funny.
Funny to whom? Humor is way too individual- that's why The Daily Show needs a character like Stewart, who can be NOT funny and still make fun of cable and network news. It's all about subtlety- which is why The Daily Show gets so many intellectual nerds watching it, while everybody else gravitates towards the edutainment they call news on the other channels.