Open Group Releases DCE 1.2.2 as Free Software 162
lkcl writes "The Open Group announced 12th January 2005 that they are releasing DCE/RPC 1.2.2 as a Free Software Project - under the LGPL. This is a major coup for Free Software: the Distributed Computing Environment is known to be involved in some major projects. There is a mirror at opendce.hands.com which runs rsync,
ftp, and there is also a dce122.tar.bz2.torrent bittorrent running as well."
freedce (Score:3, Informative)
This is one _monster_ big deal for Free Software.
This is the code that allows big companies such as IBM, Fujitsu, Entegrity etc. to bid for £500m contracts. [theregister.co.uk]
We have FreeDCE [sf.net] already, which is the DCE 1.1 Reference implementation autoconf'd and updated...
Re:Ummm (Score:5, Informative)
Re:freedce (Score:1, Informative)
He bought the $lashdot Bonus Pack©. That's a story plus a guaranteed 2nd post behind a non karma whoring first post (1st would be to obvious and a karma whore first post might drown it out. Sorry, Lindsy. ) The bonus pack only cost $50 more than the regular $lashvertisement.
From wikipedia (Score:5, Informative)
Link here [wikipedia.org]
Re:My, how times have changed (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Open the code, but charge for documentation? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Didn't M$ steal this? (Score:3, Informative)
hijacked? naaah. microsoft _really_ recognised a good thing, and unlike a lot of people who go "duuuh, i wish...", just snowballed with it.
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Re:WTF? (Score:3, Informative)
DCE did a "proper" job by using the available fields of kerberos for the correct - documented - purpose.
the use of CDS being largely irrelevant was recognised by TOG in 1999: you need to pay IBM stacks of $$$ to get the code _but_ it was recognised: OpenGroup link here [opengroup.org]. fortunately, someone has created a set of free software plugins - nss and pam etc. already [csupomona.edu]
AFS, OpenAFS, DFS - it's a long long story for another day, methinks :)
Re:freedce (Score:3, Informative)
The article author claims:
"...Global File System (which is proprietary anyway, available from Redhat)..."
Except, GFS is NOT proprietary. Behold, the source code:
http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/gfs/
And by the way, as my first impression I think Advogato sucks if only because there is no obvious way to contact the author or reply to the article to point out this inaccuracy or anyone at the site to contact about the article. Bleh.
Re:Where's the LGPL? (Score:3, Informative)
Previously, the DCE source was only available under a traditional license. Making it available under a recognized open source license (LGPL) both increases the accessibility of DCE as an interoperability technology, and permits a broader community to work on the source to expand its features and keep it current.
Not just the RPC (Score:2, Informative)
It's not just the DCE RPC that has been released, it's the whole schebang, including:
* The build environment (ODE)
* The vast documentation with specs
* Threads (Ugh!, Please don't use)
* RPC
* Directory services
* Security services
* Time sync
* File service (DFS) including the Episode file system.
* Test procedures
* The various administration tools
* The tools needed to make DCE applications.
The code is old, however and building this is not for the faint of heart, but there's lots of good stuff in there.