Sony takes on iPod Shuffle 501
Ben writes "It seems that Sony has decided to take on Apple with a low cost flash based player that will go up against the Shuffle.
Pocket-lint has
the low down on some of the stats,
as does the BBC and Engadget." The major improvement in my eyes is that some models have an FM tuner.
I don't see why they don't all have tuners (Score:5, Informative)
Every month (Score:5, Informative)
FM tuner? I can buy one of those as an accessory add-on thanks to the burgeoning "iPod economy," as Jobs puts it. I even have that FM broadcaster that lets me dial into the frequency with my car radio to hear my iPod through my car speakers without any special hookups.
I don't see Sony's player going anywhere. They feature a display, which Apple abandoned as being pointless in a tiny flash player (and they're right). And it's still more expensive.
Re:Nice (Score:5, Informative)
Damn, I should have read the press release [sony.com] (emphasis mine):
Oh well, never mind Sony. Better luck next time.
The problem with AM (Score:4, Informative)
It's more a problem of the technology behind AM than anything else. Not that they don't want to implement it.
OLED @ Wikipedia (Score:3, Informative)
Wikipedia OLED [wikipedia.org]:
"An organic light-emitting diode (OLED) is a light-emitting diode (LED) made of semiconducting organic polymers. These devices promise to be much cheaper to fabricate than inorganic LEDs. Varying amounts of OLEDs can be deposited in arrays on a screen using simple "printing" methods to create a graphical colour display, for use as television screens, computer displays, portable system screens, and in advertising and information board applications. OLED panels may also be used as lighting devices. OLEDs are available as distributed sources while the inorganic LEDs are point sources of light. Prior to standardization, OLED technology was also referred to as OEL or Organic Electro-Luminescence.
One of the great benefits of an OLED display over the traditional LCD displays found in computer displays is that OLED displays don't require a backlight to function. This means that they draw far less power and they can be used with small portable devices which have mostly been using monochrome low-resolution displays to conserve power. This will also mean that they will be able to last for long periods of time with the same amount of battery charge."
(but wait, there's more [wikipedia.org]!)Re:FM Radio (Score:2, Informative)
My Nokia [phonescoop.com] purchased from RadioShack has a built in FM tuner.
The reception is decent but you have to have a headset plugged in before it will even work.
Re:More importantly. (Score:2, Informative)
Hopefully new CEO would actually bring some change in to the company. It is a shame to see a real "engineer's" company to become one of these American Style corporation's which is only after the money.
Founders of the company were real engineers that is why Sony made first transistor radio, walkman and trinitron. Hopefully company will get back to engineering with a content twist.
Re:Sort out the software.. (Score:5, Informative)
With the iPod shuffle, you can tell iTunes to automatically select just the right number of songs to fill it up, at random, taking your song ratings into account.
Re:The problem with AM (Score:1, Informative)
Have you ever had a crystal/diode AM radio?
An ear phone, some wire, an empty toilet paper roll, and a diode are all you need. It doesn't even require power.
The problem with AM is the wavelength. You need to use a big antenna for that wavelength.
Re:FM Radio (Score:3, Informative)
-paul
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Kudo to Apple... (Score:2, Informative)
Not exactly competitive pricing... (Score:5, Informative)
NW-E405 512M -- $130
NW-E505 512M+FM -- $150
iPod Shuffle 1G -- $150
NW-E407 1G -- $180
NW-E507 1G+FM - $200
iPod Mini 4G -- $200
Re:Sony may actually have something here (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Ousted Sony CEO was given iPod as Gift (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Easy solution (Score:2, Informative)
Article reads:The 1Gb model will still cost £200 compared to Apple's iPod Shuffle at £99.
Using that Bush "Social Security" math?