Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
IBM Businesses The Almighty Buck United States

U.S. Approves IBM/Lenovo Sale 217

MartinB writes with the "Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) review result: unanimous approval for the sale to go ahead, with no further external approvals needed. No compromises were required over the location of Lenovo facilities in sensitive research areas, nor were limits put on Lenovo's ability to sell PCs to U.S. agencies."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

U.S. Approves IBM/Lenovo Sale

Comments Filter:
  • No biggie... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by PortHaven ( 242123 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @02:48PM (#11891414) Homepage
    THis was only on the "security" issues...

    In truth, most all of the materials are now made in China, Taiwan, Korea, Malaysia, etc.

    So in such light PC and component manufacturering really doesn't pose a "security" risk. Which is what this was ALL about.

    The jobs aren't there to begin with...so no worry over loss of jobs moving to China.
  • by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @02:49PM (#11891415) Homepage Journal
    this is golbalization at its best! Soon we will all be running chinese made laptops! god bless america and her polices towards communist countries.

    You don't have to be Carnac to guess most motherboards, CD drives, DVD drives, PSUs, cabinets and wiring is already being manufactured in the PRC.

    Chances are the keyboard and mouse you used in your posting, as well as the screen you are viewing, came from there as well.

    i for one welcome our new Lenoverlords!

  • Re:I blame Bush (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ravenspear ( 756059 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @02:50PM (#11891433)
    Um... "Sound business decisions" in a business sense are all about making money. If this "decision" puts money in the fatcat's pockets then it sounds like a "sound business decision" for him.

    In the larger market sense it may or may not be a good thing, but that certainly depends on your POV. However, I disagree with the prevailing sentiment here that all mergers are inherently evil and motivated by monopolistic greed. Sometimes the logistical considerations are such that a merger can benefit everyone.
  • by Ubergrendle ( 531719 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @02:52PM (#11891453) Journal
    The article is ~ 5 minutes old, and there's 10+ anti-china/america sold out posts already.

    China and Taiwan ~already~ mass-produce the vast majority of systems components, their final assembly was pretty much the only remaining domestic manufacturing process. Also, IBM is being VERY wise in this regard, cashing in a unit that has very little future projected revenue growth and miniscule profit margins, and will gain the capital for some future expansion. PCs are a commodity business, and with the exception of Dell are probably a loss-leader for most companies now (e.g. IBM, HP/Compaq).

    This is a wise business move by IBM, and it was wise for the US gov't to involve themselves in the sale. The technology is 20+ years old, the industry is commoditised, and its all open-standards based... there is no strategic threat here.
  • I should explain.. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Serveert ( 102805 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @02:55PM (#11891496)
    IBM is faced with the same dillema HP faces.

    The only way to make money in the PC biz is by selling directly to consumers, bypassing the supply chain of stores, merchants, etc. But this conflicts with, among other things, IBM's consulting business which relies upon dealing with people, building relationships, rubbing backs, etc., etc.

    HP faces a similar problem. The only way for them to make money in the PC biz is to sell directly to consumers. But this conflicts with their need for pushing printers and printer supplies which requires using the supply chain.

    Instead HP is shedding money with their PC selling business and not doing so well in the printer biz. Good job Carly! But I digress.

    Let the Chinese have the fun task of competing head on with Dell, IBM will do what they do best.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @02:58PM (#11891531)
    American Manufacturing died to day after a long illness. Repeated attempts to save American jobs and secure a domestic manufacturing base in case of war were repeatedly rejected by the new American ruling class who no are no longer responsible to a once powerful American middle class. Spokesmen for the powerful said that the death of manufacturing promotes growth, despite the fact America had higher growth rates when it did manufacture things. In related news, illegal immigration and guest worker visas rose dramaticly and new tax breaks for the super wealthy were enacted. Stay tuned to official news sources like the New York Times and Fox News and don't bitch.

  • by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @02:59PM (#11891551) Homepage Journal
    Perhaps there will be jobs in China for me to work in? At least the food is better, if not as diverse.

    Yeah, they probably don't actually use MSG in all the restaurants over there. You will probably notice the food looks a bit more rustic than the local Ho-Lee Chow [holeechow.com] or a can of La Choy.

    The BBC has been carrying a number of analysis articles on China, where the economy is booming and where it isn't. Still shooting for 7% growth this year and they'll probably make it, while the rest of the world scrambles to sell them raw materials. Notice mining and steel companies are suddenly hot items?

  • Re:Strange that (Score:3, Insightful)

    by InfiniteWisdom ( 530090 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @03:04PM (#11891626) Homepage
    So apart from being a wiseass, do you have a good reason why the sale should NOT be approved?
  • Why the naysayers? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by delta_avi_delta ( 813412 ) <dave.murphy@[ ]il.com ['gma' in gap]> on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @03:18PM (#11891802)
    I don't understand the negative reaction. Production is no longer in the US, but that is not where the money is. IBM realised that they could make a lot of money (and, incidentally, create a lot of relatively high paid, relatively pleasant jobs) by abstracting further up the value chain, to supply services and consultants. It matters not a fig to most companies who provides their computers, but many large companies cannot operate without IBM services. So we have a company that no provides high skilled, high payed jobs to the US workforce instead of low payed, low skilled manufacturing jobs.
  • by Serveert ( 102805 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @03:21PM (#11891844)
    That's because they don't compete head on with Dell. Dell doesn't and cannot sell Apple hardware for good reason. There was a good article in Business Week about this, it's common knowledge. Expect HP to shed their online PC selling business soon.
  • Shell Games (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Doc Ruby ( 173196 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @03:28PM (#11891932) Homepage Journal
    Yes, but for generations the USA business support was dressed up in attacks on Communism. IBM is a symbol of American business (the "B" stands for "Business") - selling their PC biz to a Chinese company is a little strange, in that light. But it really just shows how "Communism" and "Capitalism" are just the ways to describe how governments do business, which would be an unacceptable mix in a pure version of either system.
  • by dextroz ( 808012 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @03:34PM (#11892006)
    It's funny that Americans, looked at globalisation as the key to their future success. I remember back in the early 90s they would pressurize the Europeans into it.

    Look at them now. Sure they got cheap labor and upturned local markets everywhere, but globalisation is distributing the riches from the first world countries right down to the poorer nations. They never really figured that out quite rightly.

    Yes, yes, the people in control are of course getting richer but the avg guy is actually earning less. Also this phenomenon is so apparent local America. It's pathetic how anywhere you go in the US you get the same Denny's, Mac, BK, TacoB, OG, etc... In most of the places, the local cuisines and restaurants are all dead. Most American downtowns are going that way too. A drive through them on the weekends portrays them as ghost towns literally.

    My point? ThinkPads are definately going in the drain. 20 years ago most garments sold in the US were made here. Most stores guaranteed them. Today you see no-one guarantees anything because everyones is unsure of who's pulling what outta whose arse. That's what's gonna happen with Lenovo too.

  • by jester22c ( 613967 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @03:46PM (#11892208)
    You're exactly right.

    IBM makes a great deal of their PC sales through business/government contracts in which X machines are purchased and supported for X number of years.

    Their business image has faded in late and their contracts have migrated to other vendors. I provide hardware support within a large corporation. Our IBM contract was nixed a long time ago for Dell whom has served us much better.

    IBM... China can keep 'em

  • by gelfling ( 6534 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @04:00PM (#11892405) Homepage Journal
    At least that's what we're planning for the huge flag on the side of the building to greet our new Overlords.

    The funniest irony of all was that the PC Division, that rathole they poured billions down which rarely if ever made a profit finally made a huge chunk of change selling itself off and as a result those employees are getting the largest bonuses in the company, on a division by division basis. Lesson learned? Fuck your business up until someone buys it at firesale prices then claim a huge a victory, rake in your pile of cash. All the other IBM divisions should learn from this.
  • by djbckr ( 673156 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @04:03PM (#11892452)
    I realise this is OT, but...

    I traveled to China recently. I'll say this: Chinese food in the USA is nothing like real Chinese food.

    I particularly remember some sweet/sour chicken I got there. In the US, you get these pretty nuggets of white meat and sauce on them. In China, you get... well pretty much the whole chicken. It's like the took the whole thing (minus the feathers and major organs) and chucked it into a shredder. Spinal cord and all.

    It was an odd experience.

    One of the best meals I had there was Kangaroo Tail.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @04:04PM (#11892459)
    Back in 2001/2002 IBM desktop manufacturing was sold off to Sanmina-SCI.
    Shortly after that the manufacturing moved out of country.
    The Lenovo deal transfers those serfs known as engineers, product testers, and world wide tech support from IBM to the new company.
    It remains to be seen if the engineering and product support are shipped off to China.
  • My POV (Score:5, Insightful)

    by RogueLeaderX ( 845092 ) on Wednesday March 09, 2005 @04:41PM (#11892992)
    I agree with those who view this as a smart move by IBM. Here's why:

    1. They sell a branch of the company that was often losing money for cold hard cash.

    2. They get 19% of a Chinese company, giving them a way past China's trade barriars. They get a headstart on everyone else providing high end technology services to a booming Chinese economy that lacks said expertese and has the means to pay for it. Meanwhile HP languishes under two divisions of PC manufacturing (HP & Compaq.) Way to go Carly ... but I digress.

    3. Did I mention that this gives IBM a way to sell products and services to the Chinese? Potentially billions to be made before the Chinese technology providers mature to IBM's level. (Note: I'm not saying that China lacks intelligent people, it's just that the US/Western world has spents decades longer training thousands more techs. It won't take them long to catchup though.)

    4. If the US screws up their economy too bad IBM has a lifeline! I really hope that letting the dollar fall in value helps with the trade gap and makes it possible for US manufacturing to pick back up. I do not think that the US economy will crash in 10 or 20 years. I do worry that it will crash in 50 to 100 years. I also fear that the US will decide the best thing to do is plunder a few countries via conquest with their surplus military equipment ... anyway, that's hopeless speculation. Although, economically we are similar to Rome militarily.
    The Romans were so confident in their legions that they stopped inovating. After all, they conquered everyone worth conquering, right? Wrong, they got beat by wandering nomads who actually fought differently than the Romans were used to: how dare they?! Western based companies, often spear headed by American companies, have dominated the economy for fifty years now, but people are starting to play by their own rules. Will they be able to compete or will the 'barbarians' decimate their legions with unorthodox tactics. I honestly hope something in the middle happens ... but now this is just the rambling of an IT guy who majored in History.

Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.

Working...