Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Television Media

TiVo Starts Testing "Pop-up" Ads 603

mkraft writes "ZDNet is reporting that TiVo has started a testing a new pop-up style ad on a random and limited number of subscriber's TiVo as of this weekend. The ads are designed to be displayed on screen when the user fast forwards through specially tagged commercials. Clicking the thumbsup or select button on the TiVo remote will take the user to a menu containing more information about the advertisement (text and/or video). Unfortunately according to reports on the TiVo Community forums the ads are also showing up during actual programs as well."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

TiVo Starts Testing "Pop-up" Ads

Comments Filter:
  • "Our goal..." (Score:5, Interesting)

    by grub ( 11606 ) <slashdot@grub.net> on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:10PM (#12076498) Homepage Journal
    FTA: "Our goal is in no way to interfere with the TiVo experience," TiVo spokesman David Shane said.

    TiVo has gone from a cool company with financial problems to another advertising laden CrapCo that's cutting it's own throat. Even more reason to cancel cable entirely, buy a divx/xvid ready dvd player (well under CA$100) and download what really interests you without ads. Don't worry, the big studios won't starve. They're making buckets on product placement within the shows now.
  • by stecoop ( 759508 ) * on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:12PM (#12076520) Journal
    During Christmas I was 30 second skipping commercials and it gave a pop up and said to enter the 20 digit number on the Replay web page to be entered for a drawing of some cash (cant remember exactly). I did it - foolishly. I think it was a marketing study to evaluate the rate of capturing attention so commercials could be inserted for revenue.

    I have seen the Tivo commercial "thumbs up" but it is really non intrusive and you have only a half second to press the button the get the ad. It is just a matter of time until the commercials are back in your face though. Since I use both Tivo and Replay for comparisons. I am fortunate to pay per month instead of forking of the case for a lifetime subscription. I bet the people that have lifetime memberships will have more popups in the future. My rate of revenue/return via popup ads will approach zero if the become too intrusive.
  • My opinion... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by kebes ( 861706 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:16PM (#12076563) Journal
    We the users are willing to put up with ads to a certain extent, but beyond that, we will use whatever technology it takes to remove them because they are too annoying.

    Advertisers simply have to learn to place ads below this annoyance threshold, and they will reap the rewards. One example of a company that 'gets it': Google. Their ads are sufficiently innocuous that it's not worth the trouble to block them or get rid of them. The result? They make lots of money off of ads.

    The big networks should realize this. They want to keep their current paradigm, where a person watches 15 minutes of commercials for every hour of TV. That won't work in the future, since the users will use something like TiVo or a download that has no ads in order to get around the annoyance. If, on the other hand, the network offered us a free download of our favourite show, and during each ad segment, there was a single 10-second ad (and it was relatively funny or cool), then we wouldn't skip past it, and they would make lots of ad money.

    I think these companies need to wake up to what consumers are really willing to put up with. We are willing to watch ads and buy products we like, but we are not willing to have our time wasted.
  • Re:So much for TiVo (Score:2, Interesting)

    by NinjaFarmer ( 833539 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:17PM (#12076584)
    I personally don't think that showing a single image of an add for the product that you are fast forwarding over is a problem. The advertisers payed of the spot, so they should get something. The problem is if these pop-ups are interfering with normal viewing of the show.

    I think it would be interesting if they did something like this for free downloads of shows. 5-10 seconds for an image of the ads that would normally be where a commercial break is. You can pay to not have the ads.
  • Well, that seals it. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Ummagumma ( 137757 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:20PM (#12076619) Journal
    My gf has been egging me to get rid of the TIVO and go with the cable company offering for a while now. She wants the ability to watch one show while recording another, and the ability to use the DVR with Hi-Def programming. This just seals the deal. I'll be cancelling tonight.

    Goodbye Tivo, you'll be out of business soon.

  • Err well.. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by delmoi ( 26744 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:20PM (#12076621) Homepage
    Actualy it's like putting ads on basic cable. You pay for it, but...

    Also, how are TV networks going to take this? Not only are their ads getting skipped, but now other ones are being shown in their place! Crazyness.

    But yeah. Lame. Down with TiVo!
  • by EvilStein ( 414640 ) <spamNO@SPAMpbp.net> on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:23PM (#12076649)
    I was going to buy a Tivo so I can watch TV without advertisements. If they're just going to shove more ads at me, I guess I'm just going to skip watching TV altogether. *shrug*

    Oh well. Nice knowing you, Tivo.
  • by Nom du Keyboard ( 633989 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:26PM (#12076693)
    I pay for the TiVo device itself, then I pay a monthly service fee. Now I also have to put up with highly invasive advertising?

    Let me see:

    1: I drive to the movie house (have you seen the price of gasoline?)
    2: Pay an insane amount for a theater ticket (not to mention popcorn)
    3: Get 5 minutes of commercials for other products (that's before the 10 minutes of trailer commercials for other movies)
    4: PROFIT! (for someone else).

    Yeah, its happening everywhere because we aren't pushing back hard enough. So far, legislators in one state are pushing the idea that theaters will be requried to post the actual starting time of the movie.

    Just how much more of this do you plan to take?

  • Re:So much for TiVo (Score:5, Interesting)

    by spoonyfork ( 23307 ) <spoonyfork AT gmail DOT com> on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:29PM (#12076739) Journal

    Nothing like watching a great show and having to minimize the link for the latest viagra pill with your kids.

    Outstanding point. My brother is equally if not more concerned about what ads his children are exposed to while watching TV. One solution was to filter all ads with the notion of there never having been a worthwhile ad to watch. The assumption is that all ads are harmful to children. TiVo was a device that could help parents accomplish such as task.

  • TiVo Officially Evil (Score:4, Interesting)

    by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:30PM (#12076752) Homepage Journal
    Nothing like watching a great show and having to minimize the link for the latest viagra pill with your kids. And to think, TiVo use to be a quality DVR...

    Might as well just cross them off the list of "Good Guys" as if the deal with ComCast shouldn't have already strongly suggested that, but consider TiVo have had this ability in there all along and, like summoning a sleeper agent to commit some dastardly act (like replace all your Guinness with Budweiser.)

    Adios TiVo. Rot in hell.

  • by denis-The-menace ( 471988 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:30PM (#12076754)
    In france they have (or at least had) one hour of commercials on their channel (Saturday at supper).
    It was the most viewed time slot for the whole week!

    Tivo, however, could create an "Ads Channel" where if you watch it, you pay less on your monthly.
    To keep viewers honest AND interested make it interactive like having a short survey at the end of the commercial.
    They could even make it a game or a game-show (name the advertized product!)

    What they have done instead is given their user-base a reason to hack their TIVO box or bail right out of their revenue stream!

  • Three Seconds.... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by djrogers ( 153854 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:31PM (#12076758)
    Once TiVo gets the bugs worked out of their system (and yes, TiVo has admitted that it's not working perfectly yet), these banners will appear for a grand total of three seconds and only over a specific ad (TiVos FF at 60x). There won't be a problem with seeing 'when to stop' and such, as the banner will disappear when the ad is over.

    Personally, I don't care what's on my screen for those 3 whole seconds, it could be black for all I care.

    Frankly, if it's something cool, such as a full length movie trailer or a product I like, then I'll pay attention. If not, I'll still ignore it for 3 seconds like I do now...
  • Yuck (Score:3, Interesting)

    by swb ( 14022 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:31PM (#12076766)
    I'm annoyed that the Tivo-to-my-PC (the proper name escapes me) is intentionally crippled (yes, I know about the hacks) to only burn DVDs with their lame software, but I'm almost MORE annoyed that the the software revision to support this feature reduces my standalone S2's GUI performance SIGNIFICANTLY. Screen redraws, hitting the Tivo button, etc all take eons now. There's also an annoying font bug where if you go into a show's description in Now Playing and then channel up/down to other shows, the font changes to a kind of blurry, bolder typeface.

    I can only imagine that Tivo will eventually bog my S2 down to the point with crap that it's nearly unusable. And this I could probably live with even this and the ads IF Tivo had the brains to come out with an updated standalone box that was worth buying other than for a slightly faster CPU or slightly bigger disk.

    But no, Tivo's been staking their future on getting knocked up by a cable company, not on innovating their hardware, so there's no new standalone I can buy that would have WORTHWHILE features like cablecard support (planned for fscking '06???), digital audio recording and playback, a real fast ethernet interface, etc.

    Even though I love my Tivo, given what the thing costs relative to my financial commitment with a cable company box, I may have to get used to liking their box, which at least records HiDef.
  • by Mindwarp ( 15738 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:36PM (#12076834) Homepage Journal
    There's a quote in the article that a lot of people seem to be missing:

    Interactive advertising was part of TiVo's distribution deal with Comcast announced earlier this month.

    This functionality was a requirement of TiVo's distribution agreement with Comcast. Rather than 'good company gone evil' I think this is a case of 'desperate company gets in bed with the Devil.'

    Now I'm not going to defend this business practice in any way. I've been using the DirecTiVo since day one and have evangelised the product on many occasions in the past, but the second I start getting invasive pop-up advertising during FF I'll shed a tear and move on to something else. TiVo MUST know that this is the sentiment of a significant and vocal number of the install base, which makes me think that they saw no other way forward for themselves.

    A sad day indeed for TiVo enthusiasts, and definitely I feel a sign of the 'End of Days' for TiVo.
  • Class Action...? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Nom du Keyboard ( 633989 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:37PM (#12076841)
    And what are the chances for a Class Action suit by TiVo owners who did not have it disclosed when they purchased their box that ads were coming? Love to see that happen.

    I have a Dish Network DVR box that still has instant 30 second and back 10 second skip. Hit the skip button 5 or 6 times and I'm completely through most commercial breaks in a second or less. The "fast forward" stuff is crap on a DVR!

  • DIY TV Station (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Hoi Polloi ( 522990 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:47PM (#12076928) Journal
    I've actually been wondering about creating my own "TV Station". My wife and I have a pretty good collection of DVDs going with many of them being TV show collections. I was thinking if I had a bunch of big hard drives I could copy them onto, why couldn't I then run some sort of programming software to create my own tv programming and feed it to the TV? Does anything like this already exist? It could even be set up to only run during prime viewing hours for weeks at a time on a preset channel (ch 3 probably). So you always know that something you like will be on one of the channels but it will have the spontanious feel of real TV that you don't get when picking out a DVD.

    I could even make my own commercials, "Nothing to do? Give your husband a back rub!"
  • Two Lessons (Score:4, Interesting)

    by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF ( 813746 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:51PM (#12076968)

    There are two important lessons to be learned from the rise and fall of Tivo. First, don't lock yourself into any pay subscriptions. There is no guarantee they won't turn into ad machines. By subscribing for short periods of time or by using a free or ad supported scheduling service you can demand quality service or walk.

    Lesson two, any company can be bought or can partner with one that does not have your best interests at heart. I would not buy a encryption service from the government. I won't buy a garage door opener from a car thief. I won't buy a device to remove ads from TV from someone partnered with those ad providers. It is important to buy products and services from someone motivated to make you happy as their business model. That is no longer Tivo's business model. They make money by making Comcast happy first, and users second. It makes me glad I bought a device without a subscription from someone who does not work with the cable companies. It is also why I don't have to view ads and why I can record what I want, burn DVDs of what I want, and skip 30 seconds without a hack.

    Tivo has made a huge mistake, and a very big potential competitor here is MS. I don't trust them at all, but right now they are motivated to making their customers happy with a media center. RIP Tivo.

  • Way to go TiVo (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Cloud K ( 125581 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @12:53PM (#12076994)
    What a delightfully effective way of sending a sorta "mexican wave" of shudders down the spine of every person who's ever touched Internet Explorer in the last 5 years or so and instantly put them off your product for life.

    I've never seen a company go so quickly from "cool" to "near sco-level"

    If this is true, they can go feck off and die, and rot alongside the rest of the popup mongering scum.

    If it's an early April Fools... well... that's another story!
  • I've had replaytv for going on 4 years and I think it is the anti-Tivo. For me, Tivo is becoming the Microsoft of the DVR world - and I don't mean financially.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @01:03PM (#12077157)
    I did call to complain about this, and the 1st woman I spoke to, denied that TiVo was doing this. The second person I spoke to actually admitted they were doing this, but denied that it was happening during actual show content, which it most certainly were.

    Oh, and I did post a message on their official forum. Twice. They deleted it. Twice. It didn't conform to their warm-and-fuzzy "TiVo is the best!" requirement.
  • They were given their time slot when the show was aired and transmitted over the air or over cable.

    That doesn't give them the right to take up that space on my recording of the event.

    This episode makes me happy that I have a ReplayTV and not a Tivo. :-)
  • by Schnapple ( 262314 ) <tomkidd.gmail@com> on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @01:19PM (#12077370) Homepage
    Either choose to be subscription-supported or advertising-supported, but not both. Yeah, like newspapers and magazines.
    Years ago, before I was a techie/developer I did the math and figured out that the price I was paying to subscribe to a magazine was less than it probably cost to actually print the thing, much less cover the salaries of the people making the things.

    So it became obvious that it's the advertisers that cover the cost of the magazine. This was made further apparent when I had the "opportunity" to subscribe to a technical journal - one of those 12-page pamphlet dealies with monochrome ink and no ads, for the cost of $95 per year. No freaking way! But that's the price you have to pay if you don't want ads.

    So it occured to me - why do they even sell these things at all? I mean, if they're selling ad prices based on pairs of eyes reading the ads, why not just give the things away to ensure the most pairs?

    And this is what's happened, sorta. I'm currently getting a few technical publications for free - I got an actually useful spam ad from Fawcette and ever since I've been getting Visual Studio magazine for free. Actually, it's been over a year now so I guess they renewed me for free, too.

    The only snag is that the advertising is only worth it if the target demographic is right. So it's been a given for many years now that people who subscribe to a magazine like the topic the magazine is about, so that's how the advertising models work. The 350,000 people who pay $30 a year to get PC Gamer make it such that the advertisers think it's worth it to target those subscribers. I had to fill out a survey to get VS Magazine, so that's how they can justify to advertisers that developers are really reading it. I could find a free sewing magazine out there but I don't sew, so it would be useless for everyone involved.

    The only flaw in this logic is that I don't think they actually deny people the free magazines. I found a magazine from Fawcette called "The .NET Magazine", so I signed up for it and took the survey. It became obvious that this isn't a magazine for developers, it's a magazine for the head of the IT purchasing department. So when asked questions like "how much money in hardware purchasing decisions do you make" I answered $0. Same for how much software, etc. I still got the magazine and since then they've had the good sense to rename it "Windows Server System Magazine".

  • by hackstraw ( 262471 ) * on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @01:34PM (#12077532)
    I'm a mostly happy TiVo Subscriber

    I am a happy user of my cable company's HD DVR (motorola 6xxx model), and I'm a picky SOB. There are a few small annoyances that I can't think of offhand, but its a pretty slick box (and it does not use my phone line).

    Being that my cable box is a monthly add on service to my existing cable bill, it would seem illogical for the cable company to add a "feature" like popup ads. Regardless if I view ads or not, the cable company gets the channels at a fixed rate and I pay a fixed rate according to what channels I want. The tv channels get their advertising revenue at a rate based on their audience, not by the view (like web advertising) or according to me viewing the ads or not.

    Also, its worth mentioning that I still see a good amount of ads. It seems like I still see the same ad multiple times. In fact, I just went out and bought 8 brand new cars on those low lease deals because the ads were so good to distort my logic. (Just kidding)

    Now, TiVo too gets paid the same if you watch the ads or not. So why are they doing this? I guess the base rate of revenue is not paying off their debt fast enough.
  • by lowrydr310 ( 830514 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @01:35PM (#12077550)
    I heard a segment (I believe on NPR) about radio advertisements, and it applies to TV as well. Many radio stations are proudly announcing "shorter commercial breaks to get you back to your music faster." The person speaking on NPR stated that this trend may be doing more harm than good. The radio stations are portraying their own advertisements as a negative or bad thing - yet they need these very ads to survive! Radio stations (or advertisers) should focus on the quality of their ads. Nothing bothers me more than annoying voices or sounds. The silly commercials that are loaded with annoying people and sound effects are more likely to make me NOT buy a particular product or use a service they're offering.

    I've said this before on Slashdot - I can tolerate 'ads' on NPR that are spoken in a normal voice (like "this show brought to you in part by HP" or whatever company). There are often ads during Howard Stern that are spoken by him, and these aren't annoying at all. I can even live with product placement in TV, film, and video games. These types of ads do not interfere with the experience in any way and they're very non-intrusive.

    I always wondered why anyone would pay for satellite radio receivers and subscriptions, however after listening to a friend's I realized ther a ton of excellent channels with music I like that are commercial free. I'm in the market for a tuner now.

  • A tad extreme (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Mr. Underbridge ( 666784 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @01:50PM (#12077790)
    TiVo has gone from a cool company with financial problems to another advertising laden CrapCo that's cutting it's own throat. Even more reason to cancel cable entirely, buy a divx/xvid ready dvd player (well under CA$100) and download what really interests you without ads. Don't worry, the big studios won't starve. They're making buckets on product placement within the shows now.

    Come on. Exactly what is the harm with this? You're not missing your show. Tivo's just trying to stay alive. Do remember they're a company, and their goal is to sell things and make money. If it's not ads, it's higher subscription fees or more expensive hardware. If they can reduce my fees and stay in business in a nonintrusive fashion, go for it.

    Personally, I'd rather see an ad banner while I'm FFing than take your suggestion and download everything I want to watch. Blech. Sounds like you're trading convenience for anti-ad ideology. I'm not much for ideology, I'll take the convenience of a hopefully still alive TiVo.

    Remember, "cool companies with financial problems" become "cool bankrupt former companies" unless they find a way to reduce costs or make more money. I don't see an easy way for them to reduce costs, so how else do they make more money?

  • by sg3000 ( 87992 ) * <sg_public AT mac DOT com> on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @01:56PM (#12077868)
    > That's income generated on a monthly basis...and new
    > subscribers etc etc. And let's face it, the equipment can't be all
    > that expensive (for them).

    We studied TiVo's business model in one of my MBA classes. Basically, they lose money on each box they sell and they make ridiculous amounts of money for the service -- more than 70% direct margins, if I recall correctly.

    So the obvious idea is why the hell is TiVo selling hardware at all? Just sell a service that different devices can subscribe to. The remote control is part of it, but what's killing them in terms of margins is the set-top box.

    Personally, I like the concept of TiVo, but I hate the subscription fee idea, and I don't like the idea of buying a lifetime subscription and having TiVo change the terms over time. So no TiVo for me yet.
  • Re:So much for TiVo (Score:5, Interesting)

    by BLKMGK ( 34057 ) <morejunk4me@@@hotmail...com> on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @02:00PM (#12077921) Homepage Journal
    Hack it. I have hacked my DTIVO to run a version of software not available for the DTIVO, added a larger drive, and I'll bet that I can get rid of these ads too. Am I a rocket scientist? By no means but I can read and I spent ALOT of time doing just that over on the Dealdatabase.com forums. where the normal (and linked) TIVO forums will scream bloody murder if you talk about pulling content off of a box the DealDatabase Forums will teach you how to do that and much much more.

    My TIVO no longer accepts updates from the mothership, is networked, runs a WEB server to allow me to control it, and can accept additional modifications anytime I want. You can do this and more and it doesn't take much more than some research to do it...
  • by aichpvee ( 631243 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @02:06PM (#12078015) Journal
    Riddle me this, Batman. From the perspective of advertisers' profits, what's the difference between me watching a television program with the ads removed and walking away from the TV for some championship thumb twiddling during commercial breaks?
  • by Xibby ( 232218 ) <zibby+slashdot@ringworld.org> on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @02:50PM (#12078650) Homepage Journal
    Predictions of TiVo's death are greatly exaggerated, in my opinion. In my opinion, the banner adds while fast forwarding are a great idea.

    Think about it, advertisers want a captive audience for their advertising. They pay for product placement in movies and TV shows because they know the audience is watching attentively. Not true for running commercials on radio and TV. People walk away for a bathroom break, to grab a snack, or any number of other things.

    But if someone fast forwards through a commercial, advertisers know that you will be looking at the screen, because you want to stop fast forwarding before the show starts. You are a very captive audience, and you will be looking right at the advertising.

    Users may not like the banner ads, especially as TiVo is currently testing them and working out any bugs. In the end though, the ads are an incredibly good thing for TiVo (the company.) As long as TiVo services, TiVo subscription service will continue, and new TiVo models and features will be introduced. Good for TiVo.

    There is definitely more positive than negative with the new banner ads.
  • by JonTurner ( 178845 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @03:01PM (#12078799) Journal
    >>I think it'll take a lot of people actually cancelling their subscriptions...

    Count me in.

    I've been preparing for this moment for the past several months. My MythTV box is waiting, ready-to-go, so the instant I see my first fast-forward advertisement I'm calling Tivo and telling them to cancel my subscription, effective immediately.

    I guess I'll be checking my tivo recordings tonight, phone in hand.
  • by Traa ( 158207 ) * on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @04:19PM (#12080461) Homepage Journal
    Exactly. That's why I don't subscribe to newspapers and magazines anymore.

    If TiVo continues in this direction I will toss them too.
  • Re:A tad extreme (Score:3, Interesting)

    by endoboy ( 560088 ) on Tuesday March 29, 2005 @05:09PM (#12081400)
    The harm with this is that it diminishes my viewing experience. Tivo is attempting to sell my attention span, and I'm not amused.

    To me, this is analagous to the ads that movie theaters have been playing in recent years--I'm suddenly the captive audience for a commercial, and I DON'T like it. Not coincidentally, I used to spend a great deal more money than I now do at the movies.

    I seek out advertising free zones in my life, and it's always sad to see another one passing away.

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...