New Bill Would Ban Public NOAA Weather Data 567
ckokotay writes "Here we go again. Apparently for-pay weather companies (specifically Accuweather) have lobbied Senator Rick Santorum to introduce a bill to ban the National Weather Service from 'competing.' The NOAA just made data available for free on the internet in XML format. Essentially, that means no more free data, and the possible elimination of the NOAA web presence all together. Nothing like being able to buy off a clueless Senator - lets hope the rest do not fall in line, as I for one, do not like to pay for my information twice." This debate picks up where the last one left off. According to the article, the bill's biggest critics are complaining of the bill's vague wording which makes it unclear what exactly is being banned.
My own private army... (Score:5, Funny)
Once the bill motors through the Senate and House, and has the signature of the prez (Hey, the GOP loves private businesses, right?) I'll be able to direct when and where war actually takes place.
This should undoubtably improve my popularity gasp and maybe get me a gulp date with that cutie gosh I've had my eye on for a while!
Ok, Kim's check bounced, you can invade now.
XML (Score:5, Funny)
In other news.... (Score:5, Funny)
Soylent Green may be people, but... (Score:4, Funny)
Definition of Santorum according to Dan Savage (Score:5, Funny)
1. That frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the by-product of anal sex.
2. Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA)
What an unbelievable coincidence! (Score:5, Funny)
Ban Libraries (Score:5, Funny)
My god... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Ban Libraries (Score:2, Funny)
"Who thinks that cable and broadcast channels supply ample and unbiased new - show hands - now"....
Workaround: Learn to read FAA weather reports (Score:4, Funny)
spin (Score:5, Funny)
Santorum Proposes to Modernize National Weather Service to Better Serve Public [senate.gov]
Re:Ban Libraries (Score:1, Funny)
You're too late (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Soylent Green may be people, but... (Score:4, Funny)
let me just say.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:In other news.... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:In other news.... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:That sucks (Score:2, Funny)
Re:My god... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:You're too late (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Accuweather's crusade (Score:5, Funny)
No. More than half.
Re:XML (Score:5, Funny)
Hmm you're clearly not using enough XML
Weather service expects... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:My own private army... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Well (Score:2, Funny)
Re:let me just say.. (Score:3, Funny)
"Good people of bumfuck iowa, you don't want HOMOSEXUALS to control the weather do you?. If you don't vote for a republican not only will HOMOSEXUALS marry but they will control the weather too!"
Re:In other news.... (Score:1, Funny)
Is this on a per pane basis? I've got some 16 and 32-way composite window systems and having to buy licenses for them all will get kinda expensive...
Re:MaIl? (Score:3, Funny)
Mail? Ha...I bet most don't even read the laws they're proposing, much less voting for.
Re:XML (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Answer to: "WHY do these people get elected?" (Score:1, Funny)
As a Jew, I am deeply offended by your suggestion that I want pork. Please try to find a more culturally inclusive metaphor. Thank you.
Re:Accuweather's crusade (Score:4, Funny)
Although Democrats are often liars, it can be mathmatically proven that Republicans are more dishonest. It's short inference from known facts:
1) spreading a lie requires advertising
2) advertising costs money
3) Republicans have more money
(Fact 3 can be taken as a given, although construction of a proof is a simple exercise for the reader)
In short, Democrats are more honest because they are poorer, which gives them less ability to lie convincingly.
Re:Sure! (Score:3, Funny)
Seriously, though, would you want to trust the private sector to get severe weather warnings out in a timely manner?? OK, so maybe we shouldn't trust a government-run operation either, but at least we're not currently getting:
[1] Note: that wasn't a serious suggestion - if any more than three of us chipped in, we'd never agree on a target. There's so many choices - Redmond, SCO, certain Senators, Diebold, etc... :)
Re:Huh? (Score:3, Funny)
Are you writing a Star Wars prequel or something?
"Star Wars: The Revenge Of The South" is actually the second sequel to "Star Wars: The Nixon Menace".
Re:Answer to: "WHY do these people get elected?" (Score:4, Funny)
So, clearly the solution is to convert America to an Islamic state,
because then pork will be illegal.