Viewing Files on the Web Considered Possession? 719
Packet Pusher writes "A Georgia lawyer is taking a case to appeals court to prove that the mere act of viewing a website does not constitute possession of the materials that were automatically cached on your hard drive." While the case in question involves pornographic photos, the implications of such a declaration could reach far further.
Time to move those mp3's (Score:5, Funny)
Hopefully not possesion (Score:3, Funny)
Can't Tell (Score:4, Funny)
Now I'm worried (Score:3, Funny)
You think that's "viewing"? FTA: A federal agent said Barton's computer contained more than 450 pornographic images
From my computer:
$ find graphics/xxx/ -name '*.jpg' | wc -l
25584
Now, That's what I call "viewing"!
Re:Sophistry at its finest... (Score:3, Funny)
Well that one is just too easy...
[insert 'penis size' joke here]
why do I get the sudden feeling... (Score:4, Funny)
Why do I get the feeling that suddenly there are a few extra terabytes of free disk space across the country?
Re:Holely Cheese (Score:5, Funny)
All the guys I know whose girlfriends/wives also use the computer know EXACTLY what the cache is and how to clear it.
Doh (Score:3, Funny)
And this children, is why one should RTFA.
*cough*
Re:A flurry of frame-ups? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Holely Cheese (Score:4, Funny)
Or at least I would. If I had a girlfriend, and wanted to look at illicit internet pictures and didn't want her to know it.
Re:Holely Cheese (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Holely Cheese (Score:2, Funny)