Retailers Press For Unified HD DVD Format 293
datemenatalie writes "While the war between HD-DVD and Blu-Ray continues over who will be the direct successor to DVD, the Video Software Dealers Association (VSDA) has issued a strong statement to Hollywood and the consumer electronics industry regarding the looming HD format war. The statement, which supports a single high-definition disc format, also offers advice on dimensions, packaging, features and even how marketing materials should be designed. The statement argues, "two formats, each capable of storing high definition movies on DVD, are planned for release into the market. Retailers uniformly agree that the concurrent distribution of more than one format is likely unsustainable, and that the launch of a single format is preferable to a format war which could confuse the public and lead to reluctance to embrace either format." This comes just weeks after early indications that HD-DVD will only allow playback of full 1080 resolution video signals through HDMI connectors, leaving consumers with older HDTVs (pre-HDMI) out of luck."
HDMI Only? (Score:5, Interesting)
This could be both good and bad for HD-DVD. Film makers will like the HDMI only for the DRM capability. On the other hand, consumers who are not ready to upgrade their TV's will shun away from them. It's going to be a toss up.
That really hurts HD-DVD (Score:5, Interesting)
But that HDMI fact I did not know about. To me, that really, really hurts HD-DVD as a format. My TV supports HD up to 1080i, but has no HDMI connectors. So the format is entirely useless to me if I want to buy a TV. I just bought a TV.
Blu-Ray already fits more space per disc. I really see little reason at this point to not say "let's just go blu-ray, start retooling machines, and let the price come down." I hate the fact that Sony has its grubby mitts on it, but I'd rather have a format I can actually use without having to buy entirely new hardware. Just a player.
Retailers are taking a page from Politicians (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:HDMI Only? (Score:5, Interesting)
Isn't HD-DVD's one big touted advantage supposed to be, and correct me if I'm recalling wrong here, easy backwards compatability?
It is rather self defeating if its backwards compatable in one way but forces hardware upgrades the other way. This will probably play more against the standard than for it.
why not just let them fight it out? (Score:5, Interesting)
Same story, different product (Score:3, Interesting)
hummm (Score:3, Interesting)
HDMI = BAD
however.. for blu-ray.. unless you have a HDCP enabled device on the DVI (-d) cable then your only gonna get 480i.. or perhaps 480p anyway..
SO.. they both suck..
but blu-ray sucks less because atleast component out is still going to be available and you don't have to by an interface box.
The chinese will fix it however.. shhh.. you can already get HDCP disabled devices, just don't let hollyweird know. Leave it to a communist regime to set the capitialist markets straight.
Bias inherent to this document? (Score:4, Interesting)
In 1989... (Score:5, Interesting)
The other 6 of those years was, in my personal theory, due to DVD. DVD came out at just the wrong time (from the consumer's perspective). DVD purchasers in the late 90's thought they were getting HDTV. The manufacturers, I believe, let this myth continue and held off on HDTV-DVD so that all the consumers could finish buying all their movies in DVD, before they learned the bad news that they would have to buy them all over again in HDTV-DVD.
The only technology that is more laggard than home entertainment is space exploration.
Re:The question and answer is: (Score:1, Interesting)
In the beta vs. vhs format war it was first time people were easily able to watch porn in their homes.
Now we have the internet its irrelevant.
Anyone else notice the anti-copying suggestions? (Score:2, Interesting)
The industry's crusade to curb piracy is understandable and expected, but a statement that blatently urges designers and manufacturers to "undermine efforts" of completely legal consumer copying for backup purposes is extremely disturbing.
I realize I shouldn't be surprised, but it hurts nonetheless.
Wow, read this part (Score:4, Interesting)
This blacklisting of a single player model is quite powerful and can slow down mass piracy, but on the other hand it can also have some significant drawbacks for legitimate consumers. For instance, you could one day suddenly be unable to watch new movies on your player because it has been revoked after someone has successfully compromised this model. Practical use (as well as explanations to future customers) of this new revocation system will be very interesting to watch.
That absolutely sucks, and I had never heard about it...
Re:What's in a name? (Score:3, Interesting)
Are you crazy? Blu-Ray has the catchy name. HD-DVD sounds like a naming convention nightmare. Like something someone from BMW dreamed up working the night shift and running out of other lettered combos to affix "iii" to.
When someone asks what Blu-Ray is, they'll be informed that it is "DVD's successor" along with all the benefits. In comparison, "HD-DVD" sounds like a *riced out* addition to DVD, like a Ferrari F40 wanna-be spoiler affixed to a 10 year old Honda Civic.
Re:who cares? (Score:3, Interesting)
No, with audio CDs, almost everyone literally can't hear the difference with a higher-quality format. With HDTV, people can easily see the difference between 480 and 1080.
I'm not saying you're right or wrong, but your rationalle is certainly wrong.
Re:who cares? (Score:3, Interesting)