Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Television Media Technology

Cheap and Capable Video Monitoring Server? 14

An Anonymous Coward asks: "The company I work for is looking to invest in some security/surveillance technology. We are currently using an out-of-the-box, purpose built solution, but for the price it's pretty unreliable and leaves a lot to be desired. The specific need is for cameras to monitor areas of a site, with motion detection, the ability to integrate with other systems via simple boolean conditional switches, and a video web server. Naturally I would prefer to use a PC, as the reliability/price would be much better and the system would be more configurable. Zoneminder looks quite good, it's a Linux based OSS solution, but I'm not sure it's ready for a commercial implementation. Are there any good DIYish solutions around or are expensive consultants and esoteric hardware the only way to go?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Cheap and Capable Video Monitoring Server?

Comments Filter:
  • by 77Punker ( 673758 ) <spencr04 @ h i g h p o i n t.edu> on Saturday August 06, 2005 @04:00PM (#13259530)
    It sounds to me like the stuff you're monitoring is pretty important, so you need to make sure your surveillance is good. I'd go with hiring a consultant to deal with that so that even if it does screw up, he'll be accountable instead of you.
  • Dorgem? (Score:4, Informative)

    by OneDeeTenTee ( 780300 ) on Saturday August 06, 2005 @04:15PM (#13259603)
    http://dorgem.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net]

    Dorgem has motion capture, but it will probably fall short on many of your other requirements.
  • Motion (Score:2, Informative)

    by JRIsidore ( 524392 )
    You might want to have a look at Motion [lavrsen.dk]. It is an application written for GNU/Linux that can capture video from several sources, has builtin motion detection (hence its name), can execute commands when motion is detected and a has lot more features.
    • Re:Motion (Score:3, Informative)

      Motion is excellent.

      I've posted here before on the subject, but I have a Motion-based production-quality system continuously monitoring my house. I have a handful of cameras, both wired and wireless, that cover various areas (yes, I'm being intentionally vague. Security by obscurity *is* sometimes helpful.)

      I have a password-protected web server that allows me to check out what's going on, but for the most part, I just let it run. It's been going for years now.

      It has produced footage and stills that have bee
  • March Networks is a company that does video stuff, you should look into them...
  • Take a look at Smartsight [verint.com], now owned by Verint. They have networked video transmitters (and recievers if you want them), but typically you'd have the transmitters send video to a PC running their nDVR software [verint.com]. This is a digital solution, so assumes you already have a network in place. If not, you might just be better off with traditional analog.
    I've setup their systems a couple times. They work very nicely. One of my customers has p4-1.5 Ghz PC with standard IDE disks for their nDVR server. It supports
  • Hasn't x10.com [x10.com] contacted you already?
  • Does your city have any local vendors [cbit.ca] who put together systems for just this use?
  • email me and i'll send you details.
    i dont know what your budget is but my box is plug and play and costs $2500 or so with 4 cameras bundled. uses linux and customized versions of motion and java for control.
    i also use a BT848 chipset to do the capturing.

The biggest difference between time and space is that you can't reuse time. -- Merrick Furst

Working...