How About a Nice Game of Global Thermonuclear War? 1859
Loconut1389 writes "According to the Washington Post, the Pentagon has a revised doctrine to be signed in the next few weeks would give the president the authority for a preemptive nuclear strike. I would hope that this is a move designed to say we mean business and then never use it, but the means is there for mutual assured destruction."
Doesn't anybody remember the W.O.P.R. (Score:5, Funny)
But Mom (Score:2, Funny)
hmm, mutually assured destruction... (Score:3, Funny)
So we could have avoided... (Score:2, Funny)
I believe you meant... (Score:5, Funny)
It's OK... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Bad idea (Score:5, Funny)
Republican obsession with the Nuclear Option (Score:5, Funny)
Re:hmm, mutually assured destruction... (Score:5, Funny)
We all very well may die because a fucking cult wants to bring about the events in their "revalations." AN ACID TRIP IN A BOOK FULL OF FAIRY TALES.
Although, if we go like that then our extinction may well be for the best . . . . .
Re:_Great_ analogy (Score:1, Funny)
You believe in fairy tales don't you?
Not exactly... (Score:3, Funny)
Summary : Metal Gear?!?
Stump him with Tic Tac Toe (Score:5, Funny)
Dead Zone (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Times have changed (Score:1, Funny)
Just because two countries have a hissy-fit over who has the biggest penis, the rest of us get nuclear winter and radioactive fallout.
Thanks idiots!
Re:_Great_ analogy (Score:2, Funny)
So... Muslims Neocons have a foot fetish? That explains a LOT. ;P
Re:Hmmm (Score:5, Funny)
Next topic - Is George Bush adversely affecting the frame rate of graphics card?
Re:Pre-emptive strikes... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Once upon a time... (Score:5, Funny)
I think the lowest level for authorizing nuclear attacks should be Air Force Colonels, provided that their bodily fluids are pure.
Re:Preemptive Impeachment (Score:2, Funny)
Well, if your party had nominated someone with more brains or charisma than a cabbage, you might have succeeded.
Re:Uh? (Score:5, Funny)
Gentlemen, gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the war room!
Re:Mutual? (Score:2, Funny)
So if it launches them and they go over 12,00 miles to their target, do we get $0.15 each additional mile plus damages
Don't worry, they got him on the fine print (Score:5, Funny)
The Pentagon only gave gave him exactly what he asked for: the capability to order a "nucular" first strike.
Re:_Great_ analogy (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Bad idea (Score:2, Funny)
Because, you know, none of these countries have ever supported terrorism or sought nuclear weapons before Gulf War II....
Re:History (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Uh? (Score:1, Funny)
Jacer, I'm no scientist but according to my calculations you've just been PWNED!!!@
Re:Bad idea (Score:3, Funny)
Re:No... (Score:2, Funny)
Don't let GWB hear you calling him that, oh you ment... nevermind.....
Re:Doesn't anybody remember the W.O.P.R. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Doesn't anybody remember the W.O.P.R. (Score:5, Funny)
I'm NOT sorry, and this has to be said. (Score:1, Funny)
You just threatened our country. Expect to be visited by our military soon. I suggest you kneel on the floor, place your weapon in front of you, and put your hands in the air. I also suggest staying as far away from military hardware as possible.
If you don't speak English as you native language, the key phrase is, "I Surrender! Don't shoot!"
Thanks and have a nice day.
And we have already had a wake-up call, thank you very much. The wake up call said, as it said to every world power since the beginning of the world, "If you plan on keeping your position of power, you have to take any and all threats seriously, even if it's coming from backwards barbarians who don't even know how to properly bathe."
It sounds like it's time the rest of the world had a wake-up call. It goes like this: "You are either with us or against us." That is all.