States Push to Collect Online Sales Tax 395
Carl Bialik from the WSJ writes "On Saturday, 18 states will implement the Streamlined Sales Tax Project, which will make it easier to collect local and state sales taxes on purchases made over the Internet while offering amnesty on uncollected taxes. In their longstanding opposition to collect sales tax, many online retailers 'have cited a 1992 Supreme Court ruling that said that it would be too onerous for e-tailers to calculate all the permutations of differing state and local tax rates,' the Wall Street Journal reports. 'One goal of the project was to remove the ruling as a key defense for online merchants.' Is your state involved? 'The states that have signed on are Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota and West Virginia. Five more -- Arkansas, Ohio, Tennessee, Utah and Wyoming -- are in the process of finalizing the requirements needed to join, while Washington, Texas and Nevada are in earlier stages.'"
Direct URL to SSTP web site (Score:5, Informative)
BTW, there's been a noteable increase in Wall Street Journal stories on Slashdot - certainly has improved the quality - kudo's to the editors and Carl Bialik from the WSJ [carlbialik.com]
halloween webcam is coming [komar.org]
California charges it (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Direct URL to SSTP web site (Score:5, Informative)
Not quite (Score:5, Informative)
While I disagree with this arguement, it *could* be argued that the Internet creates a presence in every state, far beyond the old days of mail order catalogs.
What it really boils down to is politicians on both sides of the aisle hate seeing money being exchanged that they can't get their greedy hands on.
That varies from state to state (Score:3, Informative)
Of course no one I know of that lives in Ohio has ever put any amount there other than a 0. Nonetheless, it isn't accurate to say that interstate transactions are not subject to and have never been subject to sales tax.
Re:Wait just a darned minute (Score:1, Informative)
One other point: It puts local mom-and-pop operations at a disadvantage. Why should I purchase locally, even if it's the same price, when I can just "buy it over the internet, tax free". It puts all the retailers on the same level.
Re:California charges it (Score:3, Informative)
Use tax =/= sales tax.
Use tax is assessed on any item purchased by the end user. There are many exemptions but the primary one is the end user is exempt from paying use tax if the end user has already paid sales tax.
If you are paying the "use tax" for the customer and not showing taxes paid on the receipt then CA may go after the customer for use tax. The customer can't prove sales tax was paid on his/her purchase.
Re:Not quite (Score:1, Informative)
In theory, every item purchased out of state and brought into a state is subject to sales tax. It is the respopnsibility of the buyer to report the sales and pay the tax. Most states simply do not enforce this for most items because of the small amounts involved. The notable exception is automobiles, where many states require proof of the tax payment before a license may be obtained.
Re:Direct URL to SSTP web site (Score:1, Informative)
Re:A most welcome development (Score:3, Informative)
And also, states, counties, and municipalities are not being cheated out of anything. The money of the people belongs to the people, not the government. The people are being cheated out of their property.
Re:California charges it (Score:3, Informative)
Most people have no idea just how much in taxes they actually pay.
social programs (Score:3, Informative)
I'm not sure when this all started (maybe all the social programs after the great depression?), but the entitlement attitude of todays society is going to be the downfall of this country.
ooh, I missed this. Anyway, though FDR did a lot that has been built on since, the ball was rolling before he inflated it. Some credit the start to the 14th Admendment [usconstitution.net] and others put it elsewhere. When Lincoln started collecting an income tax of 3% or 5% [taxworld.org] people were upset, and they only went along with it because the Civil War had to be paid somehow, however compliance wasn't high.
Here's what Col. David Crockett when he was a US Representative from Tennessee said one day in the House of Representatives when a bill was taken up appropriating money for the benefit of a widow of a distinguished naval officer, Not Yours To Give [house.gov]. It's a good read, and I thank someone else on /. for posting it previously.
Falcon