Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies Media Sci-Fi

Watch the First 9 Minutes of Serenity 426

An anonymous reader writes "As reported on FireflyFans.net, Universal is attempting further promotion of the sci-fi action film Serenity by making the first 9 minutes of the movie available online. The clip contains the opening backstory that sets an Alliance assassin on the trail of the ship's crew; it's an effective hook. On Yahoo movies, Serenity is ranked as the number 1 film currently in theaters and is hanging in a top-ten spot in the highest rated movies of all time. Slashdot has previously covered Orson Scott Card's review, the film's opening, an interview with Joss Whedon, and much more. It's all out of love..."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Watch the First 9 Minutes of Serenity

Comments Filter:
  • Awesome (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 07, 2005 @07:25PM (#13743561)
    Okay now I'm gonna go see this.
  • UNSUPPORTED? (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 07, 2005 @07:28PM (#13743581)
    All I get is:Unfortunately, the Operating System you are currently using is unsupported.

    Any advice?
  • by SaidinUnleashed ( 797936 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @07:33PM (#13743605)
    Evidently it only works for people with the "right operating systems".

    Is it so hard to use a standard media type?

    Why do companies feel like it's right to mave stuff like this that's actually MORE trouble to make incompatible with non-MS/Mac systems?

    Seriously. I just do not get this mindset.
  • Re:UNSUPPORTED? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by temojen ( 678985 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @07:39PM (#13743645) Journal
    Never use their site again, and tell your friends to do likewise.

    They're using "video/vividas" type files, which appear to require their own applet to run, presumably for DRM purposes. DRM on marketing videos?? why??
  • Re:What the Heck (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 07, 2005 @07:42PM (#13743672)
    But... the player is Java-based. This is un-possible.
  • by RatBastard ( 949 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @07:44PM (#13743683) Homepage
    That's odd. I saw Serenity last weekend with friends who had never seen Firefly and they had not trouble keeping up with what was going on. Yes, they lost some of the richness of the story, but they did a fine job of filling in the blanks for most reasonably observant people.
  • My Review (Score:1, Interesting)

    by imstanny ( 722685 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @07:49PM (#13743716)
    On a scale of 1 - 10 I give it a 3, which means it's not worth seeing. I know that it's based on a sci-fi show 'firefly', so if you're a fan of that, i suppose it's justified.

    The movie has a 'cheap' made-for-tv feel to it. The actual plot/conflict is absurdly pointless. Aside from the initial sequence, I never feel convinced that any of the effort by the 'good side' or the 'bad side' is significantly important to those characters. The plot is boring, the monologues are bad, and their attempt at humor is sub-par. It's not as bad as Chronicles of Riddick or Battlefield Earth, but I would stick to movies like "Proof" for the weekend.

  • by AutumnLeaf ( 50333 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @08:05PM (#13743823)
    Am I the only one distrubed by JW's obsession with them?

    I haven't really seen this discussed anywhere. On the other hand, I haven't looked very hard.

    Just curious.
  • by technoextreme ( 885694 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @08:06PM (#13743825)
    I seriously cannot understand what is so great and original about this movie. Sci-fi meets cowboy theme has already been stretched in 26 episodes (plus a movie) of Cowboy Bebop.
    Orgiinaility is a horrible way to compare the greatness of works. I think it was Orson Scott Card that wrote if you worry about duplicating a specific story you will never get anything done. Ironically, after searching throuwh wikipedia for Flash Gordon I noticed that George Lucas used that as his inspiration for Star Wars. Remember it's the quality of the story that matters the most.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 07, 2005 @08:16PM (#13743878)
    Are you implying that people who enjoy Serenity have bad taste?

    That strikes me as rather biased of you.

    I do hope that the lack of alternative space-based SF gives Serenity a boost, but it's a good, solid film in its own right as well. Best ever? Not even. But still a good film which deserves a sequel.
  • by LoadStar ( 532607 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @08:20PM (#13743898)

    Correction to the submission: this is being released by United International Pictures [uip.com], the company responsible for international release of Serenity. Since UIP is partially owned by Universal, it might be seen as semantics, but UIP has a distinct marketing plan for the movie from that of Universal.

    It's also important to note, because it might seem like odd timing for Universal to release new marketing materials for a movie already released - it might even seem a move of desperation to get "butts in seats" before it leaves theaters... but it makes more sense as new marketing released by UIP for a movie they are opening today or within the next few weeks.

  • Re:UNSUPPORTED? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Doppler00 ( 534739 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @08:29PM (#13743942) Homepage Journal
    Yeah, apple.com/trailers is the same way. Why the heck to they care if people download movie trailers? It's utterly ridiculus. My only guess is that the movie studies love to have the control to pull a trailer they deam "inappropriate" at some later date.
  • by 787style ( 816008 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @08:59PM (#13744097)
    How is parent flamebait? It's the persons opinion. Has slashdot become the republican party, where we must supress views we don't agree with?
  • by fsck! ( 98098 ) <jacob.elder@NOSPAM.gmail.com> on Friday October 07, 2005 @09:35PM (#13744288) Homepage
    I've already seen the film twice, so what really shocked me is how well that worked. The video started almost instantly, and I'm on a modest DSL line shared with a neighbor. Good quality. Some noticable compression artifacts and the sound was just slightly out of sync, but still, very good for what it is.

    And to those complaining about free advertising: Let's complain instead about the granularity of SlashCode's RSS. There should be a seperate feed for each section, and some way of getting your customized index as a feed. Then you can easily exclude Sci-Fi stuff you think is so off topic.

    But I digress. Everything the studio can do to help Sereinty/Firefly/Whedon Enterprises is good. I hope we see more quality naturalistic science fiction [wikipedia.org] like this and Battlestar Gallactica in the future.
  • Huh.... I was wrong. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Tyklfe ( 903962 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @09:40PM (#13744322)
    Amazing how those nine mins just totally changed my mind. I thought Serenity looked pretty dumb and campy from the trailers, but now I'm actually going to go see it. Go figure.
  • by smoondog ( 85133 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @09:57PM (#13744399)
    I seriously think your statement isnt true

    Well, I think the facts disagree with you [movieweb.com]. Reread my original post.

       
  • by Assassin bug ( 835070 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @10:02PM (#13744419) Journal
    I probably would not have gone to see this movie. Now, I think I will. The acting doesn't seem to shabby, and the plot moves along fast enough for you not predict every tangent. Of course, this is just the first few minutes, the rest could be aweful. But I know I've seen far worse scifi flicks within the same opening-sequence timeframe. Cheers!
  • by steve_bryan ( 2671 ) on Friday October 07, 2005 @10:17PM (#13744476)
    "Seriously, are you going to tell me Serenity is better than Bladerunner?

    Yep."

    Serenity is not ambitious enough to be in that sort of company. I'm a big fan of the Firefly TV series but this movie is a serious step down from the TV series. The writing and acting were much better in several episodes. I get the feeling they might have felt it necessary to dumb it down for a movie audience. It is loud and fast with lots of fighting action but that was only one aspect of the TV episodes. I hope they are successful anyhow so there is a chance of another movie.

    I usually wait for movies to appear in second run theaters so at least I don't spend as much money if I'm disappointed. Firefly was so good I didn't have the patience to wait and yet again I wish I had found it easier to wait. If you haven't seen the series then do yourself a favor. Rent and watch the DVD's and see the movie when the price drops to $2 from the current $8.50 and more.

    Bladerunner included musing on what it means to be human, mortality, memory and really cool sci fi sets. Serenity includes some really cool sci fi sets that even evoke Bladerunner but it is a caper.
  • This is not something that happens by accident. They are ACTIVELY dissuading linux users from watching the teaser.

    Whoever is in charge of marketing has no clue.

    Which one is it: a carefully designed conspiracy against Linux users, or the end result of a naive marketing department that doesn't understand that a large chunk of their target audience uses something other then Windows?

    If I had to make a bet, I'd put my money on the latter. I highly doubt there's someone sitting around saying 'Yarr! Let's get those Linux users! That'll teach 'em for being different!". I'd guess the company providing the streaming video brought the claim of 'being able to provide high-quality on-demand streaming video to broadband Internet users using a unique process which makes unauthorized duplication near impossible' to the marketing department for the film. The 'Vividas' company most likely neglected the fact that they wouldn't be able to reliably accommodate users of alternative OSes, and it never occurred to the folks marketing the film to ask.

  • by Catbeller ( 118204 ) on Saturday October 08, 2005 @08:21PM (#13748535) Homepage
    A person should always wait for a girl to reach 18, not because one would hurt her by having icky sex with her, but because our society is apeshit insane and would tear her and her older partner to shreds. So waiting until she's of age is just sanity in an insane world.

    Of course, if everyone who'd had sex with an underaged partner were actually found out and prosecuted, the US would just become a giant prison complex full of lifers. I'd not be in there with the majority of y'all, but that's because I had a slow rampup to romance when I was young. I can't recall many teenagers I've known who didn't have an affair with an older man or woman at some time.

    You don't think teenagers gain their advanced sexual skills from people their own age, do ya? Someone's teaching someone somwhere in the sexual food chain.
  • by Deef ( 162646 ) on Saturday October 08, 2005 @10:27PM (#13748839)
    Whedon is quite clear in the film that Firefly takes place in a single solar system, "With dozens of planets and hundreds of moons", which was colonized after the solar system containing Earth was abandoned (at least, by those who moved to the new system). We even get a picture of the solar system in which the film takes place at one point. It is unclear at what point terraforming technology was perfected, but it seems consistent with his series that it was considerably after they moved to the new solar system.

    Despite your claim, I don't see any confusion on Whedon's part about the difference between a solar system and a group of stars with solar systems. His narrative is consistent throughout. I have some gripes with the way that he's laid his solar system out (for instance, IMHO the outer worlds should be CONSIDERABLY colder than the inner worlds, although some of that can be handled with a suitably chosen mix of gases for the atmosphere), but his description is at least consistent.

    As to why you never see people making interstellar hops, the obvious reason is that, in general, they don't. Anymore than the average American keeps an ocean liner in his backyard so that he can take a trip to China if he needs to. They moved to the new solar system, and that's where they live now. Interstellar colonization at sublight speeds is not a fun or quick thing to do, and makes for poor movies.

    The basic misunderstanding here is that you are used to science fiction which uses technobabble like "warp drives" and "hyperspace" to make faster-than-light interstellar hops in less than a human lifetime, but Whedon is restricting himself primarily to the actual known laws of physics, which suggest that such things aren't possible. (Also note that in his film, ships at a distance don't make noises in empty space, which is accurate but unfortunately quite uncommon in science fiction films).

    Also, keep in mind that the crew of the Firefly is POOR. They don't get the neato toys. They can't afford laser pistols, etc. Those are for those with money, such as people that live on the Core worlds.

Pound for pound, the amoeba is the most vicious animal on earth.

Working...