Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Music Media

Next Generation of MP3 Glasses 178

Doggie Fizzle writes "A review of the Nu Tech Dark Shadow 256MB MP3 Sunglasses shows one of the latest attempts to multitask common items, whether we want it or not. The Oakley Thumps may have come first, but at 3x the cost of Nu Tech Dark Shadows, even frugal geeks can look smooth... From the review: "I am a sucker for any tool or gadget that tries to combine more than one use or function into a single item, but I also have learned from experience that many times such items fail to perform well at any of the tasks they were designed to do.""
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Next Generation of MP3 Glasses

Comments Filter:
  • by dada21 ( 163177 ) * <adam.dada@gmail.com> on Wednesday November 30, 2005 @02:06PM (#14148788) Homepage Journal
    This is an interesting item but it is so 1990. The review's comment of "I am a sucker for any tool or gadget that tries to combine more than one use or function into a single item" is exactly why we don't need so many all-in-one items, but instead, mininetworked items.

    Why is Bluetooth such a relative failure? My PDA has bluetooth and I use it ALL the time. The problem is that I don't see very many viable, workable, user friendly bluetooth devices.

    If I want an MP3 player, what I'd really want is a portable deposit/store/memory bank (SD card is fine), a very tiny MP3 player and a bluetooth set of headphones. I can't find anything of the sort that WORKS.

    My bluetooth headset for my phone has TERRIBLE sound quality. The bandwidth for bluetooth should allow for a decent sound in stereo, but the mono headset is just crap. Can anyone recommend a good stereo set of bluetooth headphones that work?

    I believe the future of portable music will probably not be the MP3 player, especially as network availability becomes more pronounced. I use Shoutcast on my PDA phone to stream my entire MP3 collection from home as I want to. GPRS at 33.6K is fairly crap quality, but when I am in range of a public WiFi router (my phone has WiFi as well) I can get pretty awesome quality streaming. Nowadays I am near a public WiFi router probably 15% of the time, compared to 5% last year.

    Will we even NEED storage or a large bulky scratchable iPod when we can stream terabytes of music in a few years?
  • Sorry... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by rovingeyes ( 575063 ) on Wednesday November 30, 2005 @02:06PM (#14148789)
    The Oakley Thumps may have come first, but at 3x the cost of Nu Tech Dark Shadows, even frugal geeks can look smooth..

    Sorry I don't share your enthusiasm, but I don't think you will look smoother, only geekier. I am geeky enough and I don't want to wear it on my face. Besides, the audio actually sucks....what, I had to try it on...common gimme a break!

  • Re:obviously (Score:3, Interesting)

    by HoldenCaulfield ( 25660 ) on Wednesday November 30, 2005 @02:33PM (#14149076) Journal
    Bleh, such a bad solution for skiing . . .

    Sunglasses are a poor substitute for a good pair of goggles.

    If you really want music while you're on the mountain, lots of helmets now have built in headphones [skiingmag.com] (some of them have Bluetooth as well)

    Of course, you need to tap something into the headphones, but there are several ski shells that are designed with iPod's in mind . . . some even have controls built into the sleeves [burton.com]. Hell, there are even ridiculously expensive coats with built in iPods [spyder.com].

    If you don't have the cash to drop on a nice shell, there's also some crazy gloves [paragonsports.com] that are designed so that the wheel will still work through the glove. (Silly marketing tech sheet is here [tavoproducts.com].)

    Note: I'm not affiliated with any of the stores I linked to, they were just the first results of a cursory google search . . .
  • by Aqua OS X ( 458522 ) on Wednesday November 30, 2005 @06:04PM (#14151107)
    Ya, I agree about the bluetooth thing.

    My mouse broke the other day and I drove out to several computer stores looking for an instant replacement. Since I just bought a new bluetooth laptop I figured I'd snag a bluetooth mouse.

    I found a TON of wireless RF mice, but only TWO bluetooth mice... and they both sucked.

    WTF? I don't want a stupid RF receiver hanging off the side of my laptop. Moreover, I don't need anymore RF devices in my life.

    I saw a slew of mice touting "2.4ghz" RF .... considering that I'm already having interference problems with my 2.4ghz WiFi router 2.4ghz phone, 2.4 ghz game controllers, etc... why would I want a 2.4ghz mouse?

1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1.

Working...