Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Programming Books Media Book Reviews IT Technology

Building Intelligent .NET Applications 188

Bill Ryan writes "Sarah Morgan Rea's "Building Intelligent .NET Applications" is a book for those that get easily bored with mainstream development topics. Essentially, it's an in depth discussion of 3 niche technologies that came directly out of Microsoft Research (Microsoft Speech Server, Microsoft Analysis Services and Agents). The majority of the book is comprised of discussions of the first two technologies with roughly 12 pages being dedicated to Agents. It's finished off future Microsoft technologies "Avalon" (now known as the Microsoft Presentation Framework), Indigo, WinFS and Longhorn. Fortunately, since no one really knows when Microsoft will deliver each of these and what they will ultimately look like, she spends under 10 pages on them." Read the rest of Bill's review.
Building Intelligent .NET Applications
author Sara Morgan Rea
pages 270
publisher Addison-Wesley
rating 9
reviewer Bill Ryan
ISBN 0321246268
summary


One of the things that makes this book great is that each of the areas discussed receive very little discussion elsewhere. If you want to use Microsoft Speech Server, you are essentially confined to using the SDK documentation, the MSDN newsgroups or an occasional blog post out there. Analysis services has a little more documentation but if you were looking to do any serious A.S. development, you're still pretty hard pressed to find comprehensive resources on how to use it.

These two areas comprise roughly 80% of Sarah's book. The discussion on Speech Server comprises a little over 100 pages and does an excellent job showing you how to get Speech Server up and running and how to use it. She starts out slowly and walks you through the Speech SDK, then moves on to creating Grammars, creating Prompts, creating Transcriptions and Extractions, using the Telephony modules and debugging/performance tuning your applications. Another nice touch is that she spends a good bit of time discussing more agnostic elements of speech and telephony development, S.A.L.T. in particular. Within the discussion throughout, there's a good bit of attention paid to configuring Speech Server and the problems people are typically confronted with when they create speech enabled apps. However she does a pretty good job of balancing the introductory material with more advanced topics for although she does spend a lot of time on setup and configuration, she also goes as far as showing you how to use Speech Server from a PDA.

As far as speech (the topic goes), it would be helpful if the reader had some familiarity with the core concepts involved (such as SALT, Grammars etc.) but even if you didn't, this book would still help teach you a lot of what you'd want to know. The intended audience is clearly intermediate to advanced developers but newbies will definitely find quite a bit of valuable information in it.

The next section discusses Artificial intelligence in the context of Analysis services. If you aren't familiar with relational database concepts, then it's probably a little above your head, but most people buying this book aren't running into relational database theory for the first time.

Chapter 5 starts with using Data Mining to create predictions. It starts with getting things set up, moves onto building the data mart, and then finally 'training' the model. This discussion is pure gold in my humble opinion.

The next chapter moves on to applying those predictions. Not really much to say here without getting overly technical but essentially this chapter is a walk through of what you'd do after you had your data mart built and trained, essentially, how you'd maintain it and continue to refresh the information.

This is followed by a chapter titled "An Evolving Database". Again, this is pretty technical in nature so it's hard to describe without bogging you down in jargon. Suffice to say that everything about this section is cool++; .

The book then discusses Agents, which are cool but probably don't have that much applicability in most people's day to day lives. If you want to learn how to use them (as well as the Background Intelligent Transfer Service), then she provides everything you need.

Finally things wind down with a discussion of Microsoft's upcoming technologies, Microsoft Research, Artificial Intelligence in general (as well as many resources on where to learn more), a glossary, bibliography and finally the index. Discussing any one of the areas that she touches upon here (neural networks, Fuzzy logic, natural language processing, machine learning etc.) could comprise an entire book. That's where the beauty of this book comes in - instead of discussing the subjects one at a time, she creates a series of walk through examples where she creates specific scenarios and shows you how to address them using each respective technology.

If you're bored and want to dive into some really cool subject matter, this book is a must have. If you want to learn more about Speech technology in general and Microsoft's implementations of it in particular, this book is a must have. If you're interested in artificial intelligence again, you'll find this book to be superb. If you just want to learn about subject matter that's been discussed over and over again, like creating Winforms or drawing with GDI+, then this book probably isn't up your alley."


You can purchase Building Intelligent .NET Applications from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Building Intelligent .NET Applications

Comments Filter:
  • .NET programming (Score:2, Interesting)

    by TheDarkener ( 198348 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @02:19PM (#14221421) Homepage
    IANAP, but my good friend is. He's a huge Linux guy, but unfortunately (as a lot of Slashdotters I'm sure) programs for a Windows-only firm. He's since started using .NET, and swears by it now. He says it is incredibly easy to build applications with it. I trust his judgement, because he's an incredibly talented programmer, and also programs in C/C++, Perl and is a huge database guy as well.

    It all comes down to the best tool for the job. I'm sure you wouldn't want to use .NET for a site that gets 20,000 hits a minute, but you also wouldn't want to use C++ or Perl to integrate Windows-only applications with Active Directory, either.

    Step 1: Yes, get a brain. Don't use a hammer on a screw.
  • Mono Chapter? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by ztwilight ( 549428 ) <sysbin1120@nOspAM.yahoo.com> on Friday December 09, 2005 @02:27PM (#14221520) Homepage Journal
    If they had a chapter about Mono compatibility, I might consider the book.
  • by sfontain ( 842406 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @02:43PM (#14221691)
    The computing world has long standardized on C++/Java. Writing to a dead and platform specific technology is not very smart.

    You are just wasting time for yourself, or the people who replace you, when your stuff gets migrated to Linux.


    This is probably the most ignorant thing I have heard today. Aside from the fact that .NET is neither platform-dependent, nor dead, you have a wonderful post. Oh, except for the part about wasting time, being replacing, and Linux migration.

    My 10-man company is making millions this very minute with C#.

    Go read a book and consider trolling elsewhere. I would mod you down, however it looks like the others have beaten me to it.
  • by JebusIsLord ( 566856 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @02:57PM (#14221820)
    Absolutely true... I get various contracting request emails every day, and 90% of them want either C# or Java coders. The rest are either C,C++ or specialty jobs.

    C# and Java, btw, are two of the nicest languages I've ever used, and I've used a lot.
  • by mugnyte ( 203225 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @04:07PM (#14222624) Journal
    Interesting how the less-intelligent, personal-attack responses are from AC's, while the interesting contributors are not. Or not so new.

    While I'm at now (US northwest), a lot of the programming is .NET based. If you are living elsehwere and have a Java-only view of openings, then great! both are alive in well in the world. Claiming either is a the single choice for all is a sure sign of an incompetent developer. Worse yet, the AC's here trolling are probably not developers at all (sigh of relief actually).

  • Re:.NET programming (Score:4, Interesting)

    by ThinkFr33ly ( 902481 ) on Saturday December 10, 2005 @12:15AM (#14226421)
    The original Pentium at 200 MHz can easily handle a 100Mbit Ethernet connection with the right software.

    Ya, it's called Windows 95. Or Linux. Or NT. Or XP for that matter. What's your point?

    The original Pentium at 66 MHz can handle one million database transactions per second, with the right software.

    That's a pretty silly statement. What software would that be.

    The tcp/ip stack on FreeBSD 4.x, slightly modified to manage connections on a per port basis, can handle over one million connections per second on the original Pentium at 200 MHz.

    Interesting. There are a max of 64,000 ports. That would mean each port would need to handle over 15,000 connections per second. What useful thing could be done with so little time to do it? The memory resource required alone would almost certainly be more than any PII motherboard could hold. Even if each connection only consumed 1Kb of memory, it would take about a GIG of ram just for the connections.

    It seems like you do not have any experience with real high load software. Your setup is overkill for anything other than something developed on the Microsoft Windows platform.

    It seems like you enjoy making up stuff and then making judgements about other people's experience which you are clearly not qualified to make.

    Microsoft software is always poorly design.

    Why am I even replying to this... never mind.

To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide a test load.

Working...