Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Television Media It's funny.  Laugh. Sci-Fi

Futurama to be Resurrected? 508

KingDaveRa writes "Futurama could follow in the footsteps of Family Guy and re-enter production more than two years after it was axed. The animated series, brainchild of Simpsons creator Matt Groening, ended after four produced seasons amid lackluster ratings and broken scheduling on broadcast network Fox." From the Reuters article: "Reps for 20th Century Fox have declined to comment on the news, but Variety says initial negotiations have begun. If revived, it's unclear exactly which network would air the new episodes. While Fox housed the original series, the show found new life once reruns began showing on the Cartoon Network. Comedy Central subsequently snapped up the off-air rights and will exclusively air the repeats beginning in 2008. " A follow-up to Groening and Cohen's recent comments.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Futurama to be Resurrected?

Comments Filter:
  • Cool, but... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Jethro ( 14165 ) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @01:17PM (#14401422) Homepage
    As cool as more Futurama episodes would be, I think the last episode was just perfect as a Last Episode. In fact, some of the almost-last episodes were so good that I just dont' think it could be anything but a step back.
  • by BlueThunderArmy ( 751258 ) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @01:21PM (#14401464) Homepage
    Here's hoping for new life for Arrested Development in 2008!

    Fox could save themselves a lot of trouble by just not cancelling these shows in the first place. Low ratings for a critically-acclaimed show? How about better promotion and not jacking around with the schedule? The word-of-mouth behind these programs makes people want to watch them, but that doesn't do much good if new viewers can't find the proper time slot.

  • by MilenCent ( 219397 ) <johnwh@@@gmail...com> on Thursday January 05, 2006 @01:26PM (#14401500) Homepage
    Robot Chicken's pretty good (and Venture Bros. is awesome) but I tend to think Adult Swim's Flash shows are overrated. You can only take that kind of absurdist comedy so far, and some of them (12 Oz. Mouse) are actually painful to watch. I wonder if anyone will remember them in ten years, as there's a good chance that once the novelty's worn off, they'll go downhill fast.

    But I'm pretty stoked about the prospect of Futurama returning.
  • Dissapointing (Score:4, Interesting)

    by fermion ( 181285 ) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @01:29PM (#14401547) Homepage Journal
    I find the 'new' family guy was a big let down. I think they would have done better to put all the effort into American Dad and just let Family Guy rest in peace.

    There are certainly benifits to bringing old shows back, mostly a known audience and fewer development costs, but in terms of entertainment I find that these shows add very little.

    I enjoyed Family Guy, but face the facts. It was cancelled because it pushed too hard (When you wish upon a Weintstein), and clearly they show was nuetered before it was let back on the air.

  • Re:Cool, but... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Jethro ( 14165 ) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @01:30PM (#14401559) Homepage
    Oh, I'm sure there's a lot more places the show could've gone. Totally.

    But the show's too linear, I think. I dunno. It's not like I /wouldn't/ watch new ones and love them, I'm just happy with how it is now. And frankly I dont' trust Fox not to ruin it again! There were SO many episodes on the DVDs that I'd never seen despite my best efforts (ok, TiVO's best efforts).

    Family Guy is a show that can just pick up wherever it dropped off. Futurama, I'm not sure. And I say this because (in my opinion) Futurama is a MUCH higher-quality show.
  • what? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by engagebot ( 941678 ) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @01:32PM (#14401577)
    "But honestly, it's not that good of a show. Compared to the Simpsons, it doesn't come close. Against Family Guy, it pales in comparison. And the other shows for that age range are Aquateen Hunger Force and Robot Chicken, which are much more interesting than Futurama."

    What are you talking about? So you like Family Guy and Simpsons better. So what? Have you flipped through your cable channels lately?

    Even if you like said shows better, Futurama is more than worth bringing back considering it's infinitely better than 99.5% of what's on tv.
  • The main question (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Some_Llama ( 763766 ) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @01:35PM (#14401610) Homepage Journal
    Is will the original writing staff be re-hired, this is what really made the episodes in the first place, I remember reading somewhere about the high number of PH.ds and MBAs they had working on the writing staff, not that degress automatically mean anything, but I thought it was interesting given the type of jokes that I would often laugh at but my wife would have no clue what was funny about them...
  • by Andy Gardner ( 850877 ) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @01:37PM (#14401631)
    see more of the antics of Frye, Leela, Bender and a cuddly alien that excretes spaceship fuel.

    what about the rest?

    Fry: What's so wonderful about Leela being normal? The rest of us aren't normal. And that's what makes us great. Like Dr. Zoidberg. He's a weird monster who smells like he eats garbage and does.
    Dr. Zoidberg: Damn right.
    Fry: And the professor's a senile amoral crackpot.
    Professor: Oyeeaii.
    Fry: Hermes is a Rastafarian accountant.
    Hermes: Tally me banana.
    Fry: Amy is a klutz from Mars.
    Amy: Whoops.
    Professor: And Fry, you've got that brain thing.
    Fry: I already did!

  • by dgatwood ( 11270 ) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @01:59PM (#14401858) Homepage Journal
    Yeah. I sent a letter reaming one of my local stations for preempting the first twenty minutes of a movie. They could easily have reduced commercials to make up the time, but didn't. The station didn't even have the guts to respond.

    Here's a hint to programming managers.... Scheduling a sports event is a lot simpler than you think.

    Step 1: block an extra hour for the sports event.
    Step 2: book sports guests to fill that hour.
    Step 3: when (not if) the game runs over, trim the time per person.
    Step 4: if it runs -really- long, cut entire interviews.
    Step 5: since you've probably paid to have interviews with those folks, tape the interviews off-air at the end.
    Step 6: schedule a regular sports follow-up show later in the week and use the interviews taped after the game.

    My suspicion is that the people doing the scheduling are just clueless. As I said in a brief speech to a room full of network execs, TV personalities, and communications faculty a few years ago, when you pay people peanuts like most TV stations do, the best and brightest tend to seek careers elsewhere.

  • by TheSkepticalOptimist ( 898384 ) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @02:20PM (#14402093)
    If Matt Groening had any brains, he would avoid Fox like the plague. Same goes to other innovative show creators like Joss Whedon.

    I don't know what goes on over there at Fox, but how many decent shows have been axed for no good reason and others left on inperpetuity. Are you telling me that Kind of the Hill has had better ratings then Firefly?

    Fox doesn't realize the benefit of a small but loyal fan base. Even if shows like Firefly or Futurama only have a few million viewers, they are usually viewers that tune in faithfuly every week. With that kind of dedicated fan base, you can focus more targetted advertising to a generally similar group of viewers. This opposed to a shows like American Idol that, while having 20+ million viewers, are so varied and wishy washy (only watching the show until their favourite contestant is axed) that you can't find any common advertising ground to target the viewers. In the end, you can actually get more money for advertising slots for cult shows like X-Files, Buffy, and Futurama because advertisers know there is are at least a few million Geeks faithfully watching every week that probably would want to buy some electronic underwear with PDA capabilities.

    But Fox, in general, has been abysmal in terms of promoting innovative programming and instead dumping tired cliche sitcoms (at a time when sitcoms are dropping faster then flies on crap) and keeping long running and tiresome franchises like the Simpson's and King of the Hill on forever. Fox is realizing they are losing an audience, and so now have to rely on pulling up past successes in order to fill their timeslots.

    But if Matt had a brain, he would can the Simpsons and bring Futurama to another network and end any relationship with Fox. Even if Futurama was reserected, Fox will probably keep it going sporadically until they find some other Malcom in the Middle, Married with Children, Simpson's, King of the Hill, American Dad, War At Home clone devoid of talent to replace it.

    Quick poll. Does anybody still watch Fox these days?
  • by Otto ( 17870 ) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @02:39PM (#14402279) Homepage Journal
    If Fox had just given that (and Family Guy) a real timeslot where you could see it every week, maybe they'd have made more money off it.

    Absolutely. Fox bungled Futurama like no other show before. Even my Tivo couldn't keep up with the continously changing schedule. The reason it got low ratings is that absolutely nobody knew when it was on.

    When it started getting aired on Adult Swim, I was finally able to see a whole season or two of shows that I have never seen before. Not for lack of trying, mind you, it was just impossible to know when they aired them.

    Family Guy, however, I never did understand why they cancelled it. It had a decent timeslot, and it was getting increasing numbers of viewers. They just shot it down before it built up a large audience. These days it seems like they cancel a show if it's not an instant hit, which is stupid, of course. Firefly was totally mishandled by airing the episodes wrong (you can't do that when there are story arcs and characters to be developed). They shot down Wonderfalls, a terrific show, after only 4 episodes that *nobody knew about* because they failed to advertise the thing!

    Fox just has the most amazing bunch of idiots running the network. It's simply incredible how dumb these decisions are.
  • by fumblebruschi ( 831320 ) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @02:41PM (#14402307)
    Actually Farscape was killed because the parent company of the Sci-Fi network went bankrupt, and Farscape cost too much to make. At least they wound up the story in the two-part movie (wich I thought was pretty good.)

    That's one more reason I thought Firefly would be a great pickup for the SF Network--not only does it have a pre-made audience, it would be cheaper to make. Eight regular characters and only a half-dozen sets, plus one or two CGI shots an episode, and you can come in under budget pretty easily, I would think.

    Unfortunately, Fox still owns the broadcast contract, and has shown no willingness to let someone else buy it from them. They only let Paramount make the movie because it wasn't TV competition--and even then they wouldn't let them use the word "Firefly" in the title or the ads. In all seriousness, I think the weakest point of the movie (which I thought was really great otherwise) was the title, which I think really hurt it at the box office. Who would go see an action movie called "Serenity", if they hadn't seen the show? They would have been much better off calling it something like "Captain Reynolds Versus the Cannibal Space Pirates", or the eqivalent.
  • Re:Sunday? (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 05, 2006 @02:53PM (#14402435)
    Anyone noticed Fox using syndicated episodes of The Simpsons to surround syndicated episodes of King of the Hill and Malcolm in the Middle?

    I presume it is to boost the ratings of these shows, but the only effect it has had on me is to stop watching altogether. King of the Hill and Malcolm in the Middle are fine shows, but neither is an especially good fit between episodes of the Simpsons.
  • by Kankraka ( 936176 ) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @03:02PM (#14402546)
    You've absolutely hit the nail on the head. I used to live (aswel as attend school) in a small town where... erm, the general population was as confused about anything beyond farming as Fry was when he witnessed his first game of Blurnsball. A friend of mine and I used to spend our spares in the "cafeteria" watching Futurama and just talking about whatever. Sometimes a few people would join us in watching Futurama and at every nerdy joke, or technical joke, or anything above and beyond the mainstream there failed to be anything out of them. Not even a snicker. Of course they got the slap stick side of it. If Fry got hit, burned by eating Bender's sterno-nicoise, or if Kif was forced to look up Brannigans, uhh skirt? Or if Kif falls off the roof after an Amazonian pokes at him.. They laugh. There were even people who called us losers for watching Futurama, because it wasn't funny. Regular people couldn't see the true hilarity of it. Part of me wishes new episodes would go straight to DVD instead of being aired on tv. No one can screw around with their timeslots then, those that truly appreciate the series will be able to watch them over and over again with no worry about a football game taking valuable Futurama-Time. I dunno, I'm kinda off on a tangent here. Fact is you've got it completely right, the humour is just too intelligent for the mainstream. Kind of saddening, isn't it.
  • Re:HD? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 05, 2006 @03:08PM (#14402599)
    Then we'd finally be able to see Amy's obscene tattoo!

You have a message from the operator.

Working...