Bayesian Filters Predict Sundance 123
JohnGrahamCumming writes "The LA Times reports on a company's use of Bayesian filtering to predict the winners at the Sundance Film Festival. They use a modified POPFile email filter and claim an 81% success rate."
Another method to predict the winners (Score:2, Interesting)
1) Laughter
2) Applause
3) Standing Ovations afterward
This simple method will give you a good idea of who will be the winners.
Fit your stereotype? (Score:5, Interesting)
Bayesian for Slashdot (Score:5, Interesting)
Someone should develop a client side Bayesian Filter / Moderation system for Slashdot.
Think about it...
A sizable portion of people around here are not consistantly assholes so it doesn't really make sense to add them to a "foe" list.
Frequently things are in strange topics so it doesn't make sense to ignore whole topics.
Not all new members are trolls so modding all new members down doesn't make sense either.
And the current moderation system is subjected to other people's current peeves and political leanings.
And please don't tell me to do it, I'm an embedded developer not a web developer... I have no idea where to even begin with it.
A better thing (Score:2, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Bayesian for Slashdot (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Bayesian for Slashdot (Score:5, Interesting)
Which is what makes it so much fun!
Seriously, its wonderful that Bayesian filters are useful, but why put blinders on? Slashdot would simply cease to be interesting if you could will away anything you didn't like. Intelligent discourse requires an airing of all sides of an issue and theoretically this can lead to consensus building, if the best parts of all ideas are combined. Of course you're going to get people with very little to say, or very little between the ears, muddying the waters -- the challenge is to take the disparate elements and meld them to something coherent. Superfluous elements will be winnowed out and hopefully the end product is something most people can agree on.
Of course this is Slashdot, the Internet equivalent of a bar brawl. The rough-and-tumble of this kind of fourm is what keeps it interesting and more importantly, as much as we are infuriated by those who don't agree with us, makes us think.
adjectives bad in film descriptions, menus (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Bayesian for Slashdot (Score:3, Interesting)
Using the current mod system on Slashdot you are using someone else's blinders.
Using the Friend / Foe system you are using a static subset.
Less than 20% of the comments around here are either meaningful, thought provoking, or relevant... I want to see those that truly are interesting and between the current mod system and the outright volume I can't in the amount of time I'm willing to spend reading Slashdot.
Slashdot is not like the Internet equivalent of a bar brawl it's more like kids talking about sex in the playground of an elementary school after a heavy rain.
Re:Bayesian for Slashdot (Score:3, Interesting)