Comparison of Pandora and Last.fm 163
An anonymous reader writes "Blogger Steve Krause takes an interesting look at how music recommenders Pandora and Last.fm work, including some algorithmic strengths and weaknesses. Although he seems to think Last.fm is better now, his punchline is that a combination of their approaches will eventually be the real winner and for that, Pandora can more easily become like Last.fm than the other way around."
Pandora rocks (Score:2, Insightful)
I like != I don't dislike (Score:3, Insightful)
I say that because after using both Pandora (less) and last.fm (more) for a while, I found out that although last.fm fails (gives me music I dislike) much less, Pandora's successes are more intense, even if less common. Last.fm finds a whole lot of stuff that's OK, but Pandora finds some stuff that's awesome.
To me, one new artist I really like is worth hundreds of ones I don't care about.
Re:Pandora rocks (Score:3, Insightful)
I also find that for specific sub-genres the meta-data isn't fine grained enough. You start to see bands which personally I would class as very different with almost identical meta-data. This is a problem with the way the reviews are structured. The reviews are performed by expert musicians BUT not necesarily ones which are knowledgeable or experienced in the domain of the tracks they review. Which means if your an avid listener of a genre like say prog-metal you find its recomendations of NWOBHM style bands wholly inappropriate.
Re:Pandora wins (Score:2, Insightful)
Well it depends on how you want to use the service. If you're just trying to find new music then you're right, there is no point, but I prefer to use streaming radio as background noise. I want mostly songs that I like so I don't have to interrupt what I'm doing to skip, but if there are a lot of new songs I pay more attention to the music than my work. So for me, your description of last.fm (or, in my case, Launchcast's default settings) is perfect.