Slashdot Firefox Extension 293
christopherfinke writes "I've been working on Slashdotter Firefox extension for Slashdot users, and version 1.2 has been approved by the Mozilla admins. Features include the ability to auto-add cache links after story links (from any of Coral Cache, Google Cache, or Mirrordot), a quick-reply feature that adds a 'Reply' option to the right-click menu when you select text in a comment, the option of styling all of Slashdot's pages like a chosen Slashdot section, links in the comment sections that allow you to toggle open/closed all of a comments replies, and more. All of Slashdotter's features are optional, and the extension is compatible with Firefox, the Mozilla Suite, Seamonkey, and Flock."
Features (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Features (Score:2)
Re:Features (Score:5, Informative)
Tagging is by users (Score:3, Informative)
Users add the tags, not the editors.
Re:Features (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Features (Score:2)
I think an auto reply "this is a dupe" might be in order. Along the same lines as "reply to selected text", which seems to be working fine here.
Re:Features (Score:4, Interesting)
Does the extension automatically remove dupes and fix typos in the titles of submitted stories???
No, but I just used it to reply to your post, and it works pretty well. In the quick reply section of the preferences, I put this in for my format:
And it works great.
Re:Features (Score:2)
Does the extension automatically remove dupes and fix typos in the titles of submitted stories???
No, but I just used it to reply to your post, and it works pretty well. In the quick reply section of the preferences, I put this in for my format:
%s
And it works great.
Now if it would auto-escape HTML tags . . .
Re:Features (Score:5, Informative)
On the other hand, he really should use <blockquote> instead of <p> because it is a quote, which was what I was going to point out until I saw your post. ; )
Personally, what I use for quotes (manually, until I install the extension) is <blockquote><i>%s</i></blockquote>.
(I just hope he notices and reads this post, since I replied to a reply instead of replying to his post directly.)
The real question (Score:2)
The real question is: When will this new extension automatically insert Soviet Russia and Beowolf cluster jokes?
I'm going back into hiding now...
Awesome (Score:2)
Also, I think the replies are AJAX. Woo
Re:Awesome (Score:2)
Now we just have to wait for the VCs to come along and dump millions on the poor guy for using the word AJAX.
Re:Awesome (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Awesome (Score:2)
Re:Awesome (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Awesome (Score:2)
At First Glance (Score:5, Funny)
I thought this extension allowed me to slashdot sites while I browse. :O)
Seriously though, I like this feature:
* You can choose to have all Slashdot pages styled like one of Slashdot's sections. For example, if you're a fan of the Games section's hideous purple and black color scheme, you can have every Slashdot page look just as horrifying!
Re:At First Glance (Score:2)
Well I think that this section is going to be lost to people using the reply to selected text feature. But I am a big fan of the styling. I got really tired of the green look. But it could have been easier by just making it a user preference, since many of us are probably auto-logged in.
Re:At First Glance (Score:2)
Hey, me too.
Re:At First Glance (Score:2)
Opera? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Opera? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Opera? (Score:4, Informative)
If you hover over the comment Link (#15013415) it will pull the moderation results for this post with xmlHttp, and display the result table in a DIV tag, beside the current post.
The bookmark name is "slash mod"
The URL is:
(AFAIK this should all be in one single line.)
Once this is added to the bookmarks you can use it in the following way.
Re:Opera? (Score:2)
Re:Opera? (Score:2)
You need what for your what-hole?
Re:Opera? (Score:3, Informative)
using 1.1 (Score:2)
What about IE? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What about IE? (Score:3, Funny)
Extra "Slashdotted Firefox" Modifier... (Score:2)
Great idea (Score:2)
Thank you. Sometimes I don't even want to see the flames the come after a person makes an unpopular comment. Nice job.
Yay!.. Taco did you see that? (Score:5, Interesting)
It would make it a lot easier to find the next real comment after a comment tree created by some Troll post... Another positive thing is that we'd get rid of the "high positioning" replies that normaly end up in the first tree. Are you listening Taco?.. :)
Cheers!..
The times they.... (Score:5, Interesting)
This wasn't such a big deal when I started following Slashdot 5 years ago. But there are a lot more users now. It's really pathetic when any popular site is unable to evolve with the times — but when it's Slashdot, you want to cry.
Re:The times they.... (Score:5, Funny)
I see a great need: a Bayesian function on this extension to automagically "mod" comments; e.g. anything with the word "Micro$oft" or "M$" modded at -4, free ipod spam at -6, and so on.
Re:The times they.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:The times they.... (Score:3, Informative)
This issue isn't complicated to solve. When you leave your comments Threaded, slashcode displays some random crap comments for no other reason. Try this: set your comments to "Nested" and "Oldest First", and set your threshold to "+3". It's slashdot nirvana.
For whatever reason, Nested does what you'd think it should do. Top level posts are all the way on the left of the screen; direct replies are underneath. Setting your threshold to +3 has the following benifit: Before the karma counter ran on the Bil
Re:Yay!.. Taco did you see that? (Score:4, Informative)
I'd give them a look before I demanded the slashcode [slashcode.com] writers add features you want (or write the code yourself and submit it to slashcode), unlike other news sites [digg.com] this is an OSS project.
It's really quite nice (Score:5, Informative)
I find some of the additions of the extension to be things that really should have be built into
One negative aspect of the extension, however, is that it seems to me that, depending on the feature set you have enabled,
All of you should check this out for sure!
Re:It's really quite nice (Score:2)
Feature Request (Score:4, Funny)
Wow! (Score:2)
That's a feature I've long wanted -- every time some early bird gets a +5 for some offtopic spraying about Iraq or creationism that pulls 200 responses, I wish for it yet again. Thanks, developers!!!!
Does it have First Post button? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Does it have First Post button? (Score:2)
But what would do people with that saved time then ?
I have a better idea. (Score:3, Funny)
Funny, it reminds me of an idea I had thought about previously. Why not have a "first post this comment" while you're typing, so that it will encode the string inside your comment with steganography?
I feel a great disturbance in the force... (Score:2)
Missing one... (Score:2)
What about Camino [caminobrowser.org]? Don't forget the Mac fanatics!
Re:Missing one... (Score:2)
Re:Missing one... (Score:2)
Re:Missing one... (Score:5, Informative)
From Camino FAQ [caminobrowser.org]
Q. Does Camino support Firefox extensions?
A. No, and it never will. Firefox extensions rely on XUL (a user interface toolkit made by the Mozilla Foundation) to interact with the user and draw their interface. Camino uses Cocoa (an interface toolkit made by Apple) and does not support XUL.
Also from the interview [gigaom.com] with Camino Project lead Mike Pinkerton
We recognize this is a problem for our users, but extensions only exist because of the cross-platform UI layer upon which Firefox is built. It's that same cross-platform UI layer that makes Firefox feel "wrong" on Mac OS X. Camino's use of Cocoa for the user interface makes it fit in with the rest of the platform, but prohibits us from using extensions. We feel this is a trade-off worth making. That said, we are investigating ways to allow non-user-interface extensions to register and work correctly.
Firewall this... (Score:2)
But obviously I can still post to
Re:Firewall this... (Score:4, Informative)
Most important feature is missing! (Score:2, Redundant)
also missing... (Score:4, Funny)
Later versions will include a feature that automatically votes for the "Cowboy Neal" option in Slashdot polls.
Quoting? (Score:2)
I went under the Preferences and changed the Quick Reply Format. But it got me thinking what is the difference between blockquote + adding italics and simply the cite tag?
Re:Quoting? (Score:2)
Ah, so THAT's what you guys used! I didn't know and used the <i> tag instead.
Re:Quoting? (Score:2)
Mod parent up! (Score:2)
Why no support for trunk? (Score:2)
I look forward to using the extension when it is.
Re:Why no support for trunk? (Score:2)
Re:Why no support for trunk? (Score:2)
I haven't tried it yet, but I have this [jeroencoumans.nl] open in a tab and it looks good from what I've read.
Other features (Score:2)
Thank You (Score:3, Interesting)
As a Seamonkey user, I'm really sick of Firefox extensions that refuse to work because the author couldn't be bothered to check them properly, so thank you for taking the time.
Re:Mmm OK... where's preferences page? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Mmm OK... where's preferences page? (Score:3, Informative)
Or you can go to "tools->Extensions" and then double-click on the slashdotter plugin. It brings up a nice dialog box to configure slashdotter.
Legitimate story? (Score:2)
Re:Legitimate story? (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, we wouldn't want anyone knowledgeable about a subject starting threads.
Re:Legitimate story? (Score:2)
Re:Legitimate story? (Score:3, Insightful)
I think it deserves to make front page as it did anyway; for people who aren't interested, fair enough - it's just another story you aren't interested in. For people like myself and many others who had never heard of this extension, it's great that we've now been informed.
props (Score:2)
Suggestion!! (Score:2)
Reply to text option (Score:2)
What a great extension - it just made it straight onto my (fairly short) list of installed Firefox add-ins.
One minor request: any chance we could customise the reply to selected text option? At the moment, it just seems to wrap everything in blockquote tags, which doesn't necessarily yield well-formed HTML, and might not match someone's preferred quoting style.
Re:Reply to text option (Score:5, Informative)
any chance we could customise the reply to selected text option?
You can. It's in the Extension options.Does it fix the "slow down cowboy!" bug in slashco (Score:2)
It also discourages meaningful, brief replies if the time between "reply" and
Re:Does it fix the "slow down cowboy!" bug in slas (Score:3, Insightful)
I could pander until my karma was high, and then bombard slashdot with posts. Could have hundreds before my karma was lowerd.
In the 'olden' days when they first implemented karma and it was apoint system, I aklways felt your karma should be subtracted from the number of seconds you are forced to wait.
It is still a wait, but not as bad. Before subscription, I also thought it would be neet if people with a karma over 40 got to see the next story first.
Greasemonkey Script can make it pretty... (Score:3, Informative)
Thank God... (Score:5, Informative)
I have some ideas about what is broken on Slashdot. Some of them would require actual site modifications to fix, other could be fixed with a browser extention.
If you want more bugs, how about:
- When I'm in the post writing screen, there is no text of the story or link to it, so I have to open Slashdot in another tab and go to the story to read it.
- The comments index is very, very broken. The "threshholds" concept's three drop-down menus (-1:5), (Threaded/Nested/Flat/No comments), (Oldest 1st/Newest 1st/Highest 1st/Oldest 1st Ignore threads/Newest 1st Ignore threads), and the "Comments spill at 50" concept interact in bizzare ways such that I don't even know what it's *trying* to do.
- I *hate* the fact that comments below your viewing threshhold are listed at the bottom of the thread level instead of between the posts that it was replying to and got a reply from. So you sometimes see people seemingly reply to themselves, or flaming others, but they are actually replying to something below your viewing threshhold. I've seen arguments start this way, because someone thinks a flame was directed at them instead of to the AC that replied to them earlier. Please. for the love of god, put in an indicator if there is a post below the threshhold that a post is replying to.
- I would like to be able to view the whole comments section as a threaded, subject-only(that is, no expanded posts) view, and open up individual posts which will open up in a nested, all-open veiw. Perhaps allow right-clicks on post titles should allow you to open up the comment and its follow-ups with any pre-specified threshhold options?
- Instead of three drop-down menus in the comment index, how about a list of rules which we can rearrange the order of to make settings? Might require AJAX.
- Slashdot's user prefs allow me to "bias" the moderation towards funny, or informative, or other moderation types, but it is a PITA to change it for each story. Some stories I want to read in "funny" mode, others I want to read in "Informative" mode. I should be able to change the bias to one of several presets like on an Winamp equalizer on a per-story basis.
Re:Thank God... (Score:4, Interesting)
Stay tuned...
Cracker's wet dream (Score:3, Insightful)
I can just imagine the legions of Slashdotters (the people) installing Slashdotter (the program) as we speak (type). I know I plan to.
So, imagine if the author of this program slipped in a Trojan Horse back door or some such. Or, waited a bit, and added it to a future release. Suddenly, he'd have some level of access to the browser of hundreds or more Slashdotters!
How many people here reviewed the source code to this thing before they installed it? I know I didn't.
Food for thought
Re:trolly troll troll (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wow (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wow (Score:5, Insightful)
What you need is kids. They'll take care of your free time for you, dontcha worry 'bout that.
Re:Wow (Score:3)
Re:Wow (Score:4, Funny)
Um... anyone know if this lab is looking for QA?
Re:Wow (Score:2)
Re:Wow (Score:5, Funny)
Re:trolly troll troll (Score:5, Informative)
LEARN TO READ! HTH HAND.
Re:trolly troll troll (Score:4, Informative)
Re:trolly troll troll (Score:2)
Re:Looks good! (Score:2)
Re:Aw nuts (Score:2)
Cover your mouth when you cough!
(Comment posting works. But now I can't see tags anymore, even though I unchecked "hide tags".)
Re:Aw nuts (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Aw nuts (Score:2)
Thanks! But it looks like your site is slashdotted
Re:FP! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:FP! (Score:3, Interesting)
I prefer to have my existing tab unchanged when creating replies, so I can browse back and forth through my whole browsing history while crafting my reply.
Re:FP! (Score:3)
My own personal wishlist feature (Score:3)
As long as you're taking requests....
I usually browse with comments with a medium-high threshold. When I find a thread that looks interesting, I middle-click the comment ID (the "#12345" link after the time in the header) of the top post of said thread to open it in a new tab. Then I change that thread to a -1 threshhold, Nested, and redisplay, to see the whole thing.
It would be really nice (for me) to have that available in an automated way. Maybe on the menu when r
Re:awesome (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What about IE? (Score:2)
Re:What about IE? (Score:3, Informative)
The options dialog for the Slashdotter uses some XUL tags that weren't supported until Firefox 1.5, and not supported at all in Mozilla or Seamonkey. This isn't necessarily a problem, since you can't get to the options dialog in those browsers anyway.
If you want to change the options for Slashdotter without the dialog, call up the page about:config. Slashdotter's options all start with extensions.slas
Re:*Gasp* (Score:5, Informative)