Wallace's Second Anti-GPL Suit Loses

Enterprise OpenSource Magazine is reporting that Daniel Wallace's second Anti-GPL lawsuit has gone down in flames. From the (short) article: "The judge wrote that 'Antitrust laws are for 'the protection of competition, not competitors.' In this case, the GPL benefits consumers by allowing for the distribution of software at no cost, other than the cost of the media on which the software is distributed. 'When the plaintiff is a poor champion of consumers, a court must be especially careful not to grant relief that may undercut the proper function of antitrust.' Because he has not identified an anticompetitive effect, Wallace has failed to allege a cognizable antitrust injury.'"

Wallace was wearing the wrong trousers...

[Anonymous Coward]

Judges stand up for consumer shocker.

Read all about it!

Poor Guy

[Ohreally_factor]

He has had no luck with anything since he broke up with Grommit.

Sir, are you an idiot?

[rajafarian]

I read your post half a dozen times or so and but I can't tell. Do you charge your loved one for making her happy? (I know, I know, I'm making a few assumptions here.)

Asshat sues RedHat, Judge laughs

[Half_Ninja_Half_Pira]

News at 11.

Re:Wallace was wearing the wrong trousers...

[Anonymous Coward]

So how do we get this Judge on the Supreme Court?

Re:Who is Wallace and why did he sue?

[Anonymous Coward]

Wallace is a Physicist who looked at the BSD licence. Basically here is what I can piece together went on in his twisted brain.

"Oooh, look, I can take this, change some strings in it so it says 'WallaceOS' and sell it as a green screen command line OS for shitloads of money per copy, distributing it under a licence so my suckers...er customers can't redistrubite it, and so I don't have to give out the source code."

"WTF... nobody's buying my really cool WallaceOS? WTF there's this thing called Linux that is soooo much better under a licence called the GPL that keeps people from doing what I'm trying to do with BSD? That's anticompetative!!! "

"I must sue the Free Software Foundation and remove this evil thing called Linux and the GPL. It doesn't seem to matter that the FSF has nothing to do with the Linux kernel... only the GNU part of the OS, but who cares.... with the GPL gone, people will buy my l33t WallaceOS for whatever money I want to charge and I'll beeeee riiiiich!!!! I just hope they never hear about FreeBSD!"

Re:Who is Wallace and why did he sue?

[khallow]

That's a painful way to find out you're wrong.

GPL coders don't code for free

[Anonymous Coward]

GPL coders code for the Karma. Which is quite often better than money.

Re:Wallace was wearing the wrong trousers...

[colmore]

Still upset about Marbury vs. Madison [jmu.edu], eh?