SCO Having a Hard Time In Court 120
jamienk writes "The beginning of the end is in sight. SCO has been reprimanded for the second day in a row by a second judge in their campaign against Linux. Basically, Judge Wells ruled that SCO's vague claims of IP infringement will not be allowed to be heard in court, since it was all clearly a poor attempt at avoiding showing any evidence. Next, SCO will face compelling counterclaims against it by IBM." From the article: "At issue was whether SCO would be allowed to sneak in new allegations and evidence in its experts' reports that it failed to put on the table openly in its Final Disclosures, in effect, as IBM described it, reinventing its case at the eleventh hour. The answer today was no, it won't be allowed to do that. IBM had asked for this relief: 'Insofar as SCO's proposed expert reports exceed the Final Disclosures, they should be stricken.' More details will be arriving in a while, but assuming the early reports are accurate, we may assume that this is what the Judge has ordered." This is a follow-up to a story we discussed yesterday.
the ruling should have been . . . (Score:5, Funny)
You got some SCO on your face (Score:4, Funny)
What do you mean, vindictive?
Decisions, Decisions (Score:1, Funny)
100 shares of SCO stock or 100 nude photos of Janet Reno...
Even after you've made your decision, what the hell do you do with 100 nude photos of Janet Reno??
Complain about dupes all you want, but... (Score:1, Funny)
OT: Cheap Laugh (Score:5, Funny)
Well, it made me chuckle anyway.
So much for connecting to Slashdot at Lunchtime (Score:5, Funny)
Re:So, when do we finally get to watch... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:So much for connecting to Slashdot at Lunchtime (Score:3, Funny)