DRM 'Too Complicated' Says Gates 196
arbirk writes "BBC News is reporting on comments made by Bill Gates concerning DRM.. It seems he has got the point (DRM is bad for consumers), but that opinion differs widely from the approach taken by Microsoft on Zune and their other music related products. The comments were originally posted on Micro Persuasion. The article also has a take on Apple's DRM." From the BBC article: "Microsoft is one of the biggest exponents of DRM, which is used to protect music and video files on lots of different online services, including Napster and the Zune store. Blogger Michael Arrington, of Techcrunch.com, said Bill Gates' short-term advice for people wanting to transfer songs from one system to another was to 'buy a CD and rip it'. Most CDs do not have any copy protection and can be copied to a PC and to an MP3 player easily and, in the United States at least, legally."
DRM is good fror Microsoft (Score:5, Informative)
Re:DRM is good fror Microsoft (Score:4, Informative)
Don't be fooled... (Score:4, Informative)
For example, a DRM'ed file may appear to "copy" when the user issues the command to do so. But after the operation is completed, the user will simply get a rude awakening in the form of a message on whatever device or program their using saying that the original file was copy protected with a link to a webpage on Microsoft's website claiming that the copy didn't work because they were either trying to pirate the content or because they failed to use an approved piece of software to handle the copy operation for them.
In short, it will probably be some method that passively harrasses the user into relinquishing control of their computer to Microsoft or some other "approved" company.
Re:DRM is good fror Microsoft (Score:3, Informative)
-nb
Re:Not legal in the UK (Score:4, Informative)
This at least may well change quite soon, if the government acts on the Gowers Review:
http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6214108.
Re:erm to be fair (Score:3, Informative)
I also like it because it keeps people honest. Nobody has the right to pirate anything -- be it 14 year old kid who wipes XP Home off his computer to put XP Pro on there for no good reason except to say he did, or some real estate broker who did it basically for the same reason. Seeing how all off-the-shelf PCs from major dealers are licensed anyway, and OEM copies are a fraction of that of a retail one if you're a system builder, there is no excuse for people to be pirating Windows at all.
Windows Genuine Advantage and Windows Activation are an attempt to stop enterprise piracy and corrupt dealers from making a profit at Microsoft's expense, with neither remitting anything back to the source. They aren't perfect -- but then again, there isn't really any objective way to say "you got a new computer" versus "you had your motherboard replaced" and things like that are what causes the screwups.
Slavery 'Too Complicated' (Score:2, Informative)
One of the biggest lies is that DRM is somehow neutral, say the way that knives are neutral. It's a lie because it ignores the overwhelming pressure upon groups that naturally have an interest in controlling others others such as corporations and governments, the kind of pressure that creates laws eroding civil liberties such as DMCA, etc. Control by DRM is in principle much more efficient than control by other means and thus all the more appealing to control freaks such as Gates.
I've seen projections for virtually all PCs to have TC/DRM within five years; of course, given the current overall apathy about it, any widely used OS will support it, and embedded devices will be first. The "economic argument" in which we assume we can always buy the nonstandard system free of control does not wash: nonstandard will be more expensive, and once again only the wealthy few will be able to preserve their freedom. As an alternative to cynicism, check out DefectiveByDesign.org [defectivebydesign.org] for recent updates on the efforts against DRM.
Re:That's not DRM though. (Score:3, Informative)
Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't XP validate against your motherboard and other hardware?
And anyway I see no difference between DRM on media & validation of your OS. To me it is exactly the same principal - annoying the legitimate consumer with validation and arbitrary restrictions, while those who do pirate, don't have these problems.
Re:Interesting stance (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Interesting stance (Score:1, Informative)