Mandatory DRM for Podcasts Proposed 432
Knytefall writes "Joe Biden, Dianne Feinstein, and two GOP senators are sponsoring a bill called the PERFORM Act that would require podcasts with music and satellite radio to be locked-up with music industry-approved DRM software. From the article: 'All audio services — Webcasters included — would be obligated to implement "reasonably available and economically reasonable" copy-protection technology aimed at preventing "music theft" and restricting automatic recording.'"
copyleft? (Score:5, Interesting)
What about copyleft-licensed broadcasts? You can't "steal" something that's free.
Copying music is not theft (Score:4, Interesting)
My rights : Your rights (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm an independent filmmaker who releases all my movies under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 License [creativecommons.org] that allows anyone to freely copy, distribute, display, and perform my work.
This pro **AA act could be the nail in the coffin for not only the Creative Commons, but MY freedom as an artist.
I admit I am Anti-DRM, but there's two sides to every viewpoint. When big business wants to trample on MY rights, they'll trample on yours next. Call your House and Congressional representatives immediately to stop allowing big business interests to stomp on the rights of the actual artist.
Although my rant here is over, I won't quit until this legislation is dropped in a hole, set aflame and then buried.
Again, please write these representatives! (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/sector.asp
Of course they represent those who donate to them and unless you write their offices and your own they'll get away with this sort of crap!
Police raids (Score:2, Interesting)
So what happens to... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Completely ludicrous (Score:5, Interesting)
Hollywood's Influence (Score:5, Interesting)
An incredible coincidence that the Democrats control the Senate and House now. ("control" being very loosley defined in the sentence)
Sad, especially since the legions of
Re:Completely ludicrous (Score:2, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:2, Interesting)
DRM has NEVER been about piracy -its about control (Score:3, Interesting)
The MPAA learned from this, and since video gear is about two decimal places more expensive, they've had a head start in making sure that independent film makers are fucked when it comes to producing next-gen video. I can shoot, edit, and create totally fine high-def product - but the MPAA is preventing me from distributing it. I have to go thru them, or pay an insane price to ensure that high def disks (BR/HDDVD) will play on consumer gear by going thru a high priced disc publisher so-as to get the new DRM put on the thing.
The point of DRM is to prevent the next George Lucas (his beginnings, not his shitty blockbusters of the 2000s) from going out, making a damn fine movie on prosumer gear, editing it in Final Cut, and burning copies of the disks that will look stunning on all those plasma/LCD/DLP screens that people will want to buy and see more of. Right now, it could be done on DVD since you can make DVDs without CCS. You can't make movies without AACS and BR+ that will playback on consumer gear.
They have, by all logic, prevented independent production of next gen video disks ahead of the formats even being available. You want to make a disk - you gotta pay the toll, or you don't play. No more small, independent firms making a living heling folks get their content onto next gen disks... no more making home movies that you can send to other people.
That's what it has been about all along, it has been very little to do with piracy. Its all about making sure that when the equipment is up there with what Peter Jackson and Spielberg can get that you can't compete with them.
Of Mozart, Allegri and the Miserere (Score:5, Interesting)
Suddenly reminded of the story of Mozart and the Miserere [wikipedia.org]. The Miserere, a choral piece of exceptional beauty, was written around 1630 by Allegri. The Church in due course decided this was too good for the plebs so one of the Popes decreed that only it could only be performed in the Sistine Chapel in Rome and furthermore, this is the part I love, any of the performers who divulged, copied or gave any part of it to anyone else would be excommunicated. Ahhh original brand DRM.
When Mozart was 12 years old [classical.net] he went to Rome and witnessed the performance. Then later wrote it down from memory.
DRM didn't work then, and wont work now.
My 2 cents worth.
Re:Completely ludicrous (Score:2, Interesting)
Thoreau had a good section in his work Walden about 'the news.' Today's homework is to find and read it.
Re:Completely ludicrous (Score:2, Interesting)
This is so far from the truth with the current party of Republicans, it's amazing that anybody would even *consider* mentioning it. And actually, unless you're talking about the right to have assault weapons or pollute the environment, Democrats generally aren't the ones trying to take away your rights. And as far as "big government" is concerned, regardless of what the world was like 20 years ago, today it's the Republicans that want to build a gigantic government, spend all of our money (mostly on the military), and take away as many of our rights as they can.