Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Media Your Rights Online

Canadian Copyright Group Wants iPod Tax 408

soulxtc writes "Unable to define memory as a 'recording medium,' Canada's Private Copyright Collective goes directly after portable music player devices, memory cards, and anything else that can be used to make private copies. The PCC submitted a proposal to the country's Copyright Board that suggests levies of $5 (Canadian) on devices with up to 1GB of memory, $25 for 1-10 GB, $50 for 10-30 GB, and $75 for over 30 GB. If approved, this propoal would increase the price of a 30-GB iPod by 26%. These collections are intended to compensate artists and labels for the losses they suffer when people 'illegally' copy or transfer music. The PCC is also seeking a new $2 to $10 tax on memory cards. The backbone of digital photography has become tangled up in the fight for making sure music companies get every nickel and dime they feel that they deserve."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Canadian Copyright Group Wants iPod Tax

Comments Filter:
  • by Derek Loev ( 1050412 ) on Sunday February 11, 2007 @10:04PM (#17977612)
    Is anybody else up for a Canadian Tea Party?
  • Re:Sweet... (Score:4, Funny)

    by dmoen ( 88623 ) on Sunday February 11, 2007 @10:18PM (#17977802) Homepage
    state-sanctioned anal penetration!

    It's a Canadian tradition. Why else would we legalize gay marriage?
  • Revolution! (Score:5, Funny)

    by rossz ( 67331 ) <ogre&geekbiker,net> on Sunday February 11, 2007 @10:20PM (#17977816) Journal
    The members of the RIAA and the Canadian equivalent will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes.

    Ah, fuck it. Why wait for a revolution? Everybody get your guns and we'll meet down at the bar to plan our attack on these useless leeches.
  • by CastrTroy ( 595695 ) on Sunday February 11, 2007 @10:27PM (#17977880)
    I'm guessing you aren't talking about this kind of Canadian Tea Party [wikipedia.org]
  • why is it (Score:5, Funny)

    by v1 ( 525388 ) on Sunday February 11, 2007 @10:35PM (#17977960) Homepage Journal
    that the recording industries believe that all they have to to do make money is to make more laws?

    Why don't they try something novel like oh.... selling a product to us?

    I say we pass a law that everyone that buys a crowbar has to pay me a nickel, to make up for the losses I incur every time someone breaks into my house. ya.

    Idiots. No, I take that back. By saying that I'm just insulting the idots and that's not fair for even them.
  • by TheLink ( 130905 ) on Sunday February 11, 2007 @10:49PM (#17978036) Journal
    The problem with current copyright laws is that in the future everyone might be able to have that sort of memory for hearing, sight etc. You can also have virtual telepathy. Most of the tech is already available, it's just a matter of cost and making the implants safer and better.

    As it is, you'd probably have to have DRM in your brain "add-on", and possibly pay a fee just to remember stuff, and be prohibited from communicating with your friends about certain things.

    A penny for your thoughts? That's probably too cheap for the RIAA, MPAA etc.
  • by armchair99 ( 745329 ) on Sunday February 11, 2007 @11:02PM (#17978144)
    Oops, wait! First we registered all of our guns, then they government took them all away...damn!
  • by BobNET ( 119675 ) on Sunday February 11, 2007 @11:09PM (#17978194)

    Wouldn't it be grand if the people who distribute software started pulling this crap too? I'd feel obliged to take them up on their fees and start downloading away.

    That'd be great since I wouldn't feel bad when I download OpenBSD instead of buying the CDs. The government would obviously give them their fair share of the levy...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 11, 2007 @11:14PM (#17978248)
    Wow. They probably spent 3 meetings and 1 focus group to design the pricing scheme, and in 1 line you tear it apart completely.
  • by steveoc ( 2661 ) on Monday February 12, 2007 @12:10AM (#17978694)
    Never quite understood how these levies/tariffs are distributed back to the artists.

    So say if I download a few songs from groups such as Blood-Axe, mix it up with a bit of psy-trance from Finland, and then round it out with some Pendulum ... and then burn it all on a CD for my car driving pleasure ... how does the RIAA know how to distribute the funds to the starving artists in this case ?

    What, they dont ?

    So you mean despite the efforts of the original muso's involved, plus my time to mix and burn the CD - they just end up writing out yet another cheque to Celine Dion for all of our collective efforts ?

    Fuck No !

    Ive never wanted to even to listen to Celine Dion. Not ever !

    But when I step into an elevator, or pass through a shoe shop - there she is, singing in the background and generally ruining my day.

    I dont want to listen to her, but yet she still gets royalties out of me when I make my own CD, or backup my harddisk ?

    That is so totally around the wrong fucking way. Man - I should be PAID by Celine Dion instead as compensation for HAVING to listen to any of her music, which is clearly against my wishes. She infringes upon my personal aural liberty, and yet ... money from my pocket ends up in hers anyway ?

    That is just WRONG on so many levels.

    Seriously - does ANYONE go the effort of actually downloading Celine Dion music and burning it on CD's Why ? So they can hold hands with their so-called 'friends' and dance around and be silly between glasses of cheap wine ?

    What they should do is just stick to selling normal CD's and iPods and things without the tarriffs, but give people the right, if they so choose, to pay $100 and get a licence key that will put their CD Burner or iPod into some sort of crappy 'Celine Dion Mode'. In the same way that you can take a perfectly good PC, and pay $400 or whatever it is to stick Vista on there - enabling 'Celine Dion' mode on the iPod will virtually trash the machine, in exchange for getting the 'Wow' of having it play Celine Dion songs .. for a fee of course.

    The iPod should just operate normally, unless you 'opt-in', and pay the fee, after which the iPod degrades itself to the point where it will play Celine Dion music. 'Look Herbert, my iPod it now plays Celine Dion !!'. 'Yayy !'. 'Hey Clarence, your iPod - its turning a pale shade of Green !!'. 'Its all about the Yayy !!'.

    Its just WRONG
  • by RyoShin ( 610051 ) <<tukaro> <at> <gmail.com>> on Monday February 12, 2007 @12:23AM (#17978812) Homepage Journal

    Ah, fuck it. Why wait for a revolution? Everybody get your guns and we'll meet down at the bar to plan our attack on these useless leeches.
    I believe you mean "Everybody get your guns and we'll meet down at the bar, get drunk, shoot ourselves in the foot, then decide this was a stupid idea and go home to watch TV like the placid Americans/Canadians we are."
  • by SuperKendall ( 25149 ) on Monday February 12, 2007 @02:35AM (#17979648)
    ...I should legally be able to walk right up to any artist and kick them in the nads.
  • by TheoMurpse ( 729043 ) on Monday February 12, 2007 @03:22AM (#17979914) Homepage

    (250/40) x $40 = $240
    Let's have a moment of silence for the death of a teacher, because every time you multiply X by 1 and get something other than X, a calculus professor kicks the bucket.
  • by dcam ( 615646 ) <david AT uberconcept DOT com> on Monday February 12, 2007 @07:42AM (#17981126) Homepage
    You North Americans don't know how to have a good tea party. There should be less tomahawks and bad hair cuts and more cucumber sandwiches.
  • by refitman ( 958341 ) * on Monday February 12, 2007 @08:17AM (#17981324) Homepage Journal

    Don't tell let them hear you, or we're all screwed. What happens when they realise we can record music in our memories and play it back at will, will they start taxing our brains. 'Spose I'd best start drinking heavily to reduce my capacity.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 12, 2007 @09:17AM (#17981628)
    then demand that DRM be removed! If you're paying for it, then it's not stealing.
  • by steveo777 ( 183629 ) on Monday February 12, 2007 @10:40AM (#17982438) Homepage Journal

    Spose I'd best start drinking heavily to reduce my capacity.
    Haha! Mandatory shots after a concert! Drive safe!
  • by Sarastrobert ( 800232 ) on Monday February 12, 2007 @12:22PM (#17983794)
    OT, but pretty funny.

    A couple of years ago in Sweden a prostitute demanded to be able to be able pay tax on her income, she argued that she too had a right to the social benefits this provides (In Sweden, prostituting yourself in not illegal, pimping or buying sex is though).

    After a lot of fuss with the tax authorities, she was finally granted to pay tax on her prostitution income. She then immediatley sued our prime minister for selling sex, since he got a share of the money, she argued, he was acting as her pimp.

    That courtcase never got far I think, but it was pretty funny none the less.
  • by jmac1492 ( 1036880 ) on Monday February 12, 2007 @02:17PM (#17985442)
    Shouldn't that be RIAAA and MPIAA.

    I'd have guessed the R-I-Eh-Eh and the M-P-Eh-Eh.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...