Earth's Constant Hum Explained 336
MattSparkes writes "It has been known for some time that there is a constant hum that emanates from the Earth, which can be heard near 10 millihertz on a seismometer. The problem was that nobody knew what caused it. It has now been shown that it is caused by waves on the bottom of the sea, and more specifically 'by the combination of two waves of the same frequency travelling in opposite directions.'"
Why? (Score:2, Interesting)
Did ancient greeks know about this? (Score:5, Interesting)
Energy (Score:1, Interesting)
I'm guessing it may be to week/dispersed. But would be nice to know if it could be focussed suficiently.
But wait! (Score:5, Interesting)
Wait a minute. How do we know that it's the waves that are causing the hum, and not the other way around? Perhaps the planet is still ringing from meteor impacts, and the hum is just the resonant frequency. The deep ocean waves may be just a side effect.
I have an idea (Score:5, Interesting)
OK, I didn't say it was a *good* idea
Re:constant hum (Score:1, Interesting)
Things like EKG's and EEG's are very sensitive and contain filters to remove these frequencies
To receive this signal we must filter out other unwanted signals , This is done in seismometers, Taking the concept further we simply center the seismometers filter on 10e-3 Hz and we now have a graphical , output of this wave
Re:Alternate explanation (Score:3, Interesting)
Not quite right (Score:4, Interesting)
Tesla noticed this and build a little tool which hit on the harmonic frequency and kept accelerating the oscillation with a device he built until there were "earthquakes" observed all around, and he had to cut short a trip to run home and turn it off. Indeed in manufacturing speakers you try to get this frequency down below audioble range as you don't want the speaker to resonate and alter the sound it's supposed to generate.
It's a very common mistake made by many when they observe a symptom (not realizing there is a real why behind it.)
this is what I found (Score:5, Interesting)
IDA (International Deployment of Accelerometers) [ucsd.edu] used to detect the hum.
Article in Nature (1979) [nature.com] assesses if IDA can be used to detect very low frequency seismic data. Looking at the figure 1 of amplitude(?) ("MD counts" at Rarotonga station not shown on the current IDA map [ucsd.edu]) I can see the aftershocks in 2 hour intervals after the Indonesia earthquake, but the subj frequencies could be detected only by obtaining the spectrum (Fig.2) at mHz range which frankly looks like white noise - irregular beats.
Most interesting figure is Fig.3 which shows the 0.43-0.52mHz of the _processed_ spectrum measured at six different stations around the world at Hour 25 and on. The Alaska station (CMO) has much clearer spectrum compared to the closest (?) RAR station.
All of it must have meant something for a seismologist which I am not.
possible energy source? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:10 millihertz (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Throbbing (Score:3, Interesting)
It's more like "bang the drum softly". Once every ten seconds.
So are there any biological processes that are using this omnipresent beat for a clock frequency? Do any of the intracellular membranes we are familiar with quiver in resonance with the Earth beat? Would it be possible to predict the shape of such a biological structure?
I'm guessing that life has found a way to take advantage of this constant beat to organize sequences of activity. If that it so, there would be health consequences for astronauts: the ISS might need to have a thumper installed on the hull. There are probably also health consequences for anyone working in an environment where the Earth beat is drowned by industrial noise.
On mars the atmosphere shakes once every year (Score:3, Interesting)