Digital Film Distribution System Coming 124
aniyo~ writes with word of a collaboration of movie studios with distribution companies to come up with a system for rapid digital distribution of movie masters. Universal Pictures, Warner Bros., and a company called Digital Cinema Implementation Partners are working on technology that will allow much more responsive film distribution based on local needs. DCIP is wholly owned by the Regal, AMC, and Cinemark theater chains, which among them run 14,000 screens in North America. The new system would be available to those and other interested theater operators. About 2,200 U.S. theater screens currently show digital films, and today these are, by and large, delivered on hard drives.
Digital = More Piracy? (Score:2, Insightful)
That is... would the quality be raised, i.e. the actual movie being copied vs. someone recording the screen? It would be a lot easier to borrow one of the HDDs, copy it, and return it rather than coming in w/ a tripod to record it.
Something to think about...
Cool! (Score:2, Insightful)
Yeah, I know. And pigs may fly...
I am sorry... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Digital = More Piracy? (Score:3, Insightful)
What I'm interested in was this line:
That kind of rapid delivery, Reid said, would allow theater operators the flexibility to economically market niche films that could be shown for just a day or two to a targeted audience.
Are they saying that cutting out the production of film reels is going to lower costs for the movie theaters (they won't have to spend tens of thousands on reels)? Why do I suspect that no savings will be passed along to the ticket buying public?
Re:Digital = More Piracy? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:I am sorry... (Score:5, Insightful)
1. Dates.
2. Teenagers who want to get out of the house.
3. People who want to get together and watch a movie with a bunch of friends, and don't have a $3000+ entertainment system and a living room that seats 20+ people comfortably.
4. New movies that aren't on DVD yet.
5. Art films and foriegn films that aren't available on DVD.
6. Imax.
Re:24 fps... (Score:3, Insightful)
I can only wonder what a 60 fps film would look like, but I do know that I've had my fill of backwards spinning wagon wheels and nausea inducing camera pans.
Probably the best way is to start with the Pixar-type films for kids and then move on up with that generation...
Re:And nothing else (Score:1, Insightful)
The 1 MB per frame limit isn't too handicapping, either. Keep in mind this is the *projection* format, not the working/DI format, so it can be heavily compressed without causing too many problems. Of course enough compression on the delivery end and you'll see all the lousy artifacts that make people like me ask what the big fucking deal is with HD/digital television, but hey.
I do, however, wholeheartedly agree that theater chains are remarkably shortsighted in their business vision. And that their interest in quality of presentation is next to zero.