GTA IV Trailer Inflames Big Apple Politicians 158
GP writes "The GTA4 trailer isn't 48 hours old yet, but NYC politicians are up in arms because the game's setting, Liberty City, is a virtual version of the Big Apple." Obviously these guys never played GTA3, since it was also set in the "fictional" Liberty City, that also felt a lot like NYC.
When "Slow News Day" is way too fast (Score:5, Interesting)
Meanwhile, the house committee [house.gov] on "intellectual property" ponders how to implement a licensing regime for ephemeral copies of recordings each time they pass through a computer's RAM.
Sorry, I know I'm not supposed to bitch about rejected stories or (in this case) ones that have been pending for a week... couldn't help it this one time.
Safest? (Score:4, Interesting)
I think one of the reasons that New York politico's don't like the New York / Liberty City parallel is that it is just to close to home, and NYC really is very similar to the virtual world inside GTA.
Chicago is a much nicer, safer, cleaner and just better city than New York. Notice that game makers don't generally use it.
Cheers
hmm (Score:2, Interesting)
It felt nothing like NYC. Seriously, Rockstar hasn't really done a good job capturing the feel of the cities they parallel. Vice City didn't feel like Miami either.
Re:Safest? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Safest? (Score:2, Interesting)
http://www.areaconnect.com/crime/compare.htm?c1=n
Re:Safest? (Score:1, Interesting)
His greatest success was reducing the bureaucracy and letting the departments solve problems at the lowest possible level. This is the opposite of rigid bureaucratic systems like the French National Police which treat different areas with only one sized brush. If one precinct wants to target jaywalkers, so be it. And if they need help the department could change at a moments notice to move 20 cops to traffic patrols or identity theft investigations, or whatever else was needed. Instead of passing new laws like most politicians he used the laws already passed and worked within the system. If shoplifting went up 10% in the city he didn't ask to raise the penalty for shoplifting, he just assigned more cops to enforce the laws. Crazy ideas!
If only we would do that in the rest of the country (of course, without micromanaging). How many times have the penalties for drug offenses been raised with nothing to show for it? Or the penalties for littering or speeding? The $400 fines for littering and $150 traffic tickets have done nothing to stop either.
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Safest? (Score:3, Interesting)