BitTorrent Inc. Introduces Ad-Supported Downloads 115
BTJunkie writes "BitTorrent Inc. is experimenting with alternatives to paid downloads on their Entertainment Network, and is now experimenting with advertising supported downloads. This news comes nearly one month after the initial release of the Entertainment Network, a possible sign of failure.'The ad-supported model is currently being tested on episodes by the video gamers network G4, but is likely to be tested on episodes from other publishers in the future. The video ads are short video clips delivered by YuMe Networks, a company that is specialized in IP based video ads. YuMe CEO Jayant Kadambi said that the company expects to deliver more user targeted video ads as soon as BitTorrent Inc. signs more deals with publishers that want to experiment with ad-supported downloads.'"
Future of downloadable media (Score:2, Interesting)
That together with their crowdfunding business model to fund the recording will be the future I think, or at least will play a big role in it.
Absolutely. (Score:2)
However, their model could still use some improvements. For example, they currently set the same price for every artist ($50,000), and they use that money solely to fund the production of an album. The artists don't get a penny of it; they have to rely on ad revenue.
What if, instead, an artist could set his own price and use the money however he wants? Let's say you're a guy with a laptop and a guitar, and you have no desire to sell CDs or go to a studio for professional recording, you just have some ideas for a few songs. Why not charge only a few hundred bucks (which would be held in escrow), record and mix the songs yourself, upload the MP3s when you're done, and then pocket the money? You'd be directly selling your labor, giving yourself a guaranteed income instead of hoping for ad revenue that may never materialize.
Yuk (Score:4, Interesting)
Road signs, radio, tv, t-shirts, hell, even the back of police cars in some cities.
Personally i try to avoid doing businesses with companies that practice 'flooding advertisement'.
Re:Yuk (Score:2, Interesting)
Just as long as they realize they *still* can't force me to look at or pay attention to their ads.
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
Re:Yuk (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Yuk (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
How else is Hammer gonna rap to me about how rad my British Knights are?
Not really (Score:1)
Re: Cheaper TV please (Score:1)
Re:Yuk (Score:3, Insightful)
Umm.... advertising is a way to influence people buy stuff. See the generic/store brands at your favorite grocer. Cheaper *and* no advertising needed.
In the absence of ads, people are generally smart enough to know what they need, when they need it. The world as we know it wouldn't grind to a financial halt if advertisers were to die off in some mass extinction, in spite of what sales people would like you to think.
Re:Yuk (Score:5, Insightful)
Without advertising, I doubt so many people would be buying things they don't need and overextending their credit to do so. While the world wouldn't grind to a financial halt, it would slow down significantly, probably causing a major recession/depression. The economy is unfortunately very dependent on the stupid people of the world who use their paycheck as a ticket to shop till they drop for useless crap.
I used to be married to someone like that.
Re:Yuk (Score:5, Insightful)
As ortholattice says, one of the most intractable problems for the US economy today is the extension of expensive credit. The savings rate is MINUS ONE PERCENT. We are told that this is a great and booming economy, but everybody owes more this year than they did last year, and the cost of carrying that credit is more expensive than ever.
We have just started to see an unprecedented level of mortgage forfeiture. People will lose their homes like never before because they used the little bit of equity they had built up in their houses to pay off their credit cards, and they did so by snapping up all the insane adjustable rate mortgages and interest-only home equity loans. It all worked as long as prices went up. With just the merest contraction in the housing market, hundreds of thousands, probably millions of people are going to get hurt when their monthly mortgage payments quadruple.
Advertising. Making you want something you don't need, making you want something you don't want. Making you want something that's bad for you. It's the economic equivalent to religious fanaticism. The "free-market" radicals that have been driving this country and our economy since WWII have lied to us. The free market only serves to shrink the number of people who have power and wealth. The only way this game ends is by the vast majority of us living in near poverty, working 60 hours a week just to live.
I'm looking at a graph published in the Detroit Free Press that was made using US Census data. Since 2000, the average income of Americans has gone down by between 6 and 9 percent. That takes into account the nice raise that you think you got back in January. Yet, your president tells you that we've got the strongest economy in years. What he leaves out is that it's strongest for him and his pals. You and me? Not so much.
Sure, you've got a swell 42" HDTV screen, a nice car, and a couple of the latest game consoles. But only because your credit cards are working harder than ever before. What you really have is indenture to the credit industry. We're getting screwed and advertising is the pimp. As long as you can keep moving up, getting those raises, avoiding layoffs, moving those balances from card to card it'll seem like it's all working. Do you know what those in the credit industry call people who pay their credit card balances in full every month? "Deadbeats". Seriously. They hate people who pay their bills on time and are responsible.
Advertising is not your friend. Neither is "faith-based" finance.
Buying Luxury = Stupid? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
Oh, let's not forget April 1st's remarkable experiment in ad-based movie distribution, the Aqua Teen Hunger Force movie. I was really quite impressed with their bravery in that particular case until... well the joke was on me. Sort of, because now I'm going to get it off bittorent. I weep little for Turner broadcasting.
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
Nifty
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
Dude...
I think I've seen enough ads in my life to have paid for every movie, tv show, and cd I've ever stolen off of bittorent
But the ads aren't there to pay for the tv show, movie etc. They're there to *hopefully* pay for those shows, that people might think of their products when they need buy something. The ads don't pay, but the ads are there to boost sales. So effectively, we still pay for those, it's just that it's been spread over stuff that we always have bought (which in turn we bought because of ads).
I understand if people hate ads (thank god for adblock). I don't understand why people don't know why ads exist. So at least until people come up with new business models to support artists without charging the consumers (that doesn't include piracy), I hope we could at least understand.
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
The evil solution is to find someone who has the most to lose. Instead of enforcing telemarketing laws, legislatures can always tag phone companies with hefty tax bills proportional to the amount of spam calls received and reported. Unfair? Too bad, the citizens have no right to suffer the flux of annoyance so that phone companies can make a few extra hundreds.
Re:Yuk (Score:3, Interesting)
Not really.
I use adblock while web browsing, and any site that manages to piss me off with lots of advertising never gets visited twice.
And yet I am still, through my own targeted browsing, led to devices/things I wish to purchase on-line.
I guess this is because, contrary to the statistically defined web browsing individual, I am in fact already aware of the things I want to buy, and quite capable of convincing myself as to their usefulness.
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
Re:Yuk (Score:5, Insightful)
Advertising is designed by the worlds best psychologists to make you feel unhappy with your life as it is, so you will go buy something. They work even if you ignore them. What you are experiencing is the surrendering to their influence that happens when you just give up under the bombardment and the accompanying rationalization. If you cut yourself off from the constant bombardment of ads for a little while, you'll be shocked.
Advertisers, with knowledge and intent, systematically manipulate people to react according to their primitive responses instead of with reasoned responses, contrary to peoples larger self interest and for personal gain.
And they've carved an industry for themselves out of the fact that "Superior Performing Product A" will be ignored in the face of competition from "Inferior Performing Product B" assisted by the pervasive advertising machine.
Their tactics are so effective that to a certain extent they've made themselves the gatekeepers of the so called free market economy.
They're fucking evil.
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
Wow, like seriously, you wiped the smile off my face and made me regret feeling good all this morning.
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
I've got ad blocking software in my browser so I see (almost) none while online. I watch almost no TV now, listen to radio that has no commercial ads and live in a city (Canberra Australia) that has very few (if any?) billboards etc.
It's great! I stopped watching TV and have actually made choices that I don't think I would have otherwise, I've become more creative in visual and musical arts and I'm enjoying life more. I recommend it to everyone.
You don't have to be bitter to point out that advertising is ruling many peoples choices and as such lives.
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
Why? Because I was married to a lazy biatch who sat in front of it and neglected our child for years before I finally divorced her and got my kid.
Since then I haven't been able to stand television. For my SF video needs I rely on getting dvds of series I particularly want.
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
1. People realise it's evil. One day, the next big scary thing will be advertising. Ironicly this fact will be heavily advertised. It will become the new paedophiles or cigarettes or trans-fats. People will come to realise that avoiding it is part of a healthy lifestyle.
2. One major company will break ranks and block ads. For example, an ISP will start offering Firefox with AdBlock installed as part of it's software package. Most ISPs already offer free anti-virus, anti-spyware and pop-up blockers. Next it will ads. Maybe the Google toolbar will start making Flash click-to-play. Maybe someone will release a network enabled TiVO that automatically cuts out ads, or pixelates the in-program ads for you. Someone will decide to make money out of ad-blocking.
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
Re:Yuk (Score:3, Interesting)
Online ads are just one small part of the problem.
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
However, I make a point of not buying anything that pisses me off through obtrusive advertising.
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
I pretty much not only ignore advertisements but put those items on my 'not going to buy it' list.
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
Frankly, I think their best bet would be to make ads that people want to watch. If you go on youtube, a compilation of funny ads is one of the top videos of all time. Put another way, you create a self-replicating meme, and tag on a payload.
Of course, Bittorrent Inc. is probably screwed. The kind of people who use bittorrent are usually not terribly concerned about legality anyway. So asking them to buy a bunch of DRMed crap, and waste their bandwidth on ads is probably not a smart idea. If they set up a nice, clean FTP server with plain old MPEGs, they might get people to pay for it, if they were lucky. They might attract videophiles with too much money, who want to max out their pipes. But if it's bittorrent, you're paying them so they can use your bandwidth.
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
This is the same logic as "Their best bet is to have a shower and dress up nice before raping my wife."
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
But yes, we got both types over here in the states. Public busses have done it for decades. Rather disgusting if you ask me.
Even our license plates are advertisements in many cases. ( for the state one lives in )
Re:Yuk (Score:1)
Re:Yuk (Score:3, Insightful)
* The first is the obvious costs of creating and distributing the advertising including the administration surrounding that process. Note, that when I say the cost to distribute the advertisment, I am talking about the cost for the distributor to distribute the advertisment.
* The second cost is the time wasted by those looking at (or just avoiding) the advertisments. This is an incredible cost. The majority of viewers don't use ad filtering tools or machines like Tivo. Also, while it is possible to time advertising with bathroom breaks, time broken up into small chunks is worth much less than a contiguous period of time.
* The third cost is the direct effect that advertising has on people's purchasing decisions. Advertising directly aims to undermine the consumers information about products by trumphing their own product as the best, and it is very effective at doing that. As everyone should know, the key to an effective market economy is informed consumers. The problem becomes obvious...
* Information pollution is also a cost. Tired of seeing billboards whereever you go? Not to mention that excessive advertising hides real information. The best example of this is search engine optimization. Advertiser pay money to fool search engines, while useful information disappears under loads of paid ads.
The sad thing is that advertising won't decrease anytime soon. Advertising is unfortunally effective, and it is a viscious cycle where the only response is for the opposing businesses is to buy their own advertisment. I would go as far as to say that advertising in its different forms is the bureaucracy of the libertarian society.
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
No, it's just you. Everybody else loves ads. And telemarketers.
Re:Yuk (Score:2)
I'd happily download an xvid with embedded ads of the latest Sopranos episode, especially if I have the right to format shift it. I wouldn't bother removing the ads - sure, I might skip through them, but they're THERE and I'd probably see them.
This means I wouldn't have to shell out AU$60 to buy part one of Season 6 on DVD.
Patch (Score:5, Funny)
Patch to bypass advertising to be released in about a week. Probably on Bittorrent.
Re:Patch (Score:1)
If I'm looking for free shit, what makes them think I want to see ads for shit I have to pay for? I wouldn't be blowing so much time on the internet downloading warez and porn site rips if I had money to blow.
BitTorrent Inc. concept flawed from the start (Score:5, Insightful)
The flaw in this logic is a failure to understand the success of the BitTorrent protocol. People use BitTorrent because they don't have the money to pay for the bandwidth to distribute what they are distributing because they don't have a revenue model.
However, if you have a half-decent revenue model, such as advertising, revenue easily offsets the bandwidth costs of distributing video from a central server over HTTP, so why put your users through the pain of having to install a piece of client software?
BitTorrent's problem is that anyone that can afford to pay them for their services can probably afford to distribute their content over HTTP from a centralized server, and why wouldn't they given the much lower barrier to entry for their users?
Re:BitTorrent Inc. concept flawed from the start (Score:2)
Big words from the man who "invented" Freenet. *coughBrandonWileycough*
Re:BitTorrent Inc. concept flawed from the start (Score:2)
Re:BitTorrent Inc. concept flawed from the start (Score:3, Funny)
</sarcasm>
Duh... (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:BitTorrent Inc. concept flawed from the start (Score:4, Insightful)
Plus, if this turns out to be a highly desirable feature, browsers will soon support P2P without the need for external/plugin software.
Re:BitTorrent Inc. concept flawed from the start (Score:2)
Re:BitTorrent Inc. concept flawed from the start (Score:2)
Re:BitTorrent Inc. concept flawed from the start (Score:2)
Re:BitTorrent Inc. concept flawed from the start (Score:2)
Re:BitTorrent Inc. concept flawed from the start (Score:2)
Since Opera started including Bittorrent 2 months ago I predeict firefox will have it in, 4 months.
I.E. should have it in 4 years...
I 3 Microsoft.
Re:BitTorrent Inc. concept flawed from the start (Score:1)
we all know that the RIAA and MPAA will sue even if they are just sueing to put BitTorrent Inc. out of business.
Re:BitTorrent Inc. concept flawed from the start (Score:2)
Good point, something to consider is that a BitTorrent-like protocol can be used in conjunction with an ISP to keep costs under control and to improve performance.
Let's say that 100 people on a street are watching American Idol. If everyone has to open a unique connection to a centralized server, that means that the street is using 99 times the upstream bandwidth that it needs. If the ISP supports some kind of a BitTorrent-like proxy, it could send the episode of American Idol to the street once. This allows it to keep the upstream open to allow 50 outbound Skype calls from teenage girls to talk about Sanjya's new haircut.
Will it pan out? (Score:4, Interesting)
However, the tv shows need ad-revenue to keep going, even if the could offer the episodes with commercials, they still need to keep cycling the commercials for a flow of revenue. Plus bandwidth problems if using direct downloads for HD quality episodes.
I hoped for something like this. I loathe the current internet-based offerings on the network websites. Small resolutions, and constant re-buffering and queuing the next clip.
I just wonder if they will be able to pull this off without having the commercials easily circumvented. I have no doubt that the commercials can be circumvented, the key word here is
Re:Will it pan out? (Score:4, Interesting)
The answer is in the format (Score:0)
Re:Will it pan out? (Score:2)
Re:Will it pan out? (Score:2)
Re:Will it pan out? (Score:1)
If anyone reading this knows who thought that up, tell them that they get kudos.
Er? (Score:5, Insightful)
Interesting. (Score:2, Interesting)
Sounds like a sustainable formula to me. No DRM though, I want to be able to burn it onto a cd and watch it on my Tele, not just my small computer screen. Encode it in H.264, or DiVX or whatever is high quality.
way to make money (Score:2)
Does anyone have any idea how much ressurecting Firefly would cost? That money has to come from somewhere and if we aren't paying for it up front (straight-to-video, cinema or the idealogical subscription-but-ad-free-cable) then it has to be paid for by advertising.
I havent seen Firefly, i could have torrented the lot but havent, not one second of it has passed my corneas and will not do until i get around to buying the box set. I doubt very much my purchase will cause the magical relaunch of the series but we cant have it both ways.
What needs to happen is some established dude like Rodriguez needs to stick the finger to the studios, get a whole bunch of cash from some very optimistic investor and release a kick ass film trilogy via the iTunes model (distribution and bandwidth issues aside): $2.50 for DVD ISO or AVI, $5 for the HD H.264 AVI, $10.00 for the physical DVD with making-of booklet (shipping not included).
what THEN needs to happen is for amazon to pick up the physical edition and the film reviews and word-of-mouth being very positive and not just in the "oh isnt it quaint a low-budget indie film with cardboard sets releases it's wares on the interweb" way but a "holy fuck this is some good shit i only wish it'd had a cinema release so i could see it on a big screen" way.
so long as people pay for the damned thing, knowing that not one cent is going to rupert murdoch and friends and dont just torrent it then the revolution will begin. what will probably happen is that a bunch of slashdotters will bemoan the codec, format, price, color of the website, fact that some guy shoots before some other guy and tout that as a reason not to pay for the thing because, y'know it should be free for $INSERT_REASON
G4 (Score:5, Funny)
Wait, what? (Score:2)
Downloads only happen when the client is full-screen/ad playing?
Workaround: shut off monitor/speakers, make sandwich
Videos interspersed with ads?
Workaround: Annoying, but use virtualdub to take them out.
Popups/software required?
Workaround: figure it out or just stick to Paarrite Bay
Re:Wait, what? (Score:1)
Re:Wait, what? (Score:1)
Re:Wait, what? (Score:5, Insightful)
Not really - it merely shifts the costs, and costs more because of implementation expense. Advertising requires significant expenditure in the people who work in the field. That expense is borne out by the customer - as all expenses eventually are. Advertising is overhead. Overhead should always be minimized.
Re:Wait, what? (Score:1)
I moved to a different building on campus about 1.5 years ago and lost my cell signal at my desk from my current provider. Now that my contract is up, I'm switching to the only cell provider that provides a cell signal to my desk. Advertising doesn't matter. Of the four providers in my area, only one provides a signal to my desk.
It will be worse (Score:2)
It's not enough to interrupt you every five minutes (I'm not joking) to show you ads. It's not enough to have product placement that's really only vaguely relevant (Bond's electric razor in "Die Another Day"). They now have to randomly cut into your show -- take over a fucking quarter of the screen, WITH SOUND, to show you an ad while your show is still playing.
This is not just virtualdub. There's no way to remove these without butchering the content, or resorting to DVDs. Which is what I have done. Fuck TV, I'll either pirate or buy/rent DVDs. If they ever do it to my DVDs, I'll just give up any TV at all.
Re:Wait, what? (Score:2)
In case you missed it.... (Score:1)
This is a well known dance (Score:5, Informative)
Then, came the internet, and the most tech savvy people began to get access to what they want, ad free and faster than over the legal channels of distribution, going around the artificial international syndication delay, that used to be 12, even 18 months! Most people still don't have access to such goodies, but it is a matter of time until someone with guts and technology creates a high quality YouTube-like system for movies and series.
Trying to push advertisement to this internet target audience will not work, as getting rid of ads is one of the reasons people go to the internet to look for things. People would even pay for content, they do it every time by buying complete season DVDs (although 70/$60 is kinda bitter to shell out in a single season), as long as the price is not extortive. People will not pay $4 to rent an episode for 24 hours. They can buy the whole season for, let's say, $60, what in the average 22 episodes season + 8 extras mean that they can *own* the goddamn thing for $2/episode. People will not download it to watch ads, they can watch with ads TV already, without the hassle of having to download, or watch it without ads, jumping through a few hoops.
Bottom line is: sell an episode of a serie in an ITunes like system (preferentially without the DRM) for $ 0.99 (fixed price) and people will buy it. Better yet, along with the file transfer, let people watch what they bought in an YouTube style interface, so people don't need to bother with media players, codecs or moving the file around.
* By time I was writing this, I remembered I was watching my favorite soap opera ( gasp!) but the advertisement ran for so long that I completely forgot about it, and lost the whole second half. Damn.
Re:This is a well known dance (Score:2)
Seriously?! I guess we are kind of lucky here in the UK as we have the BBC. But it would be interesting to see channels' market share by %adverts (controlling for content, etc.) to see if the intangible cost to viewers can be worked out... i.e. how much extra would you pay for a reduction in x minutes of advertising? My worry is that content providers are working under the assumption that more ads does not equal less viewing pleasure - which might mean we are all heading for the Portugese model.
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
So (Score:1)
Re:So (Score:1)
you must be new here.
wtf? (Score:1)
Great! (Score:1)
Entertainment Value (Score:2)
Too little, too late (Score:2)
so wait (Score:2)
The true price of media is revealed! (Score:2)
How much can watching an ad be worth in revenue? Certainly not £1 per customer. It's the same on TV - they don't make anything like £1 per viewer on a show. Sure, there are bandwidth costs, but since it's BT you take on some of those yourself anyway (or your ISP does).
I'd pay 10p for a half hour TV show. No DRM, good quality xvid. Plays on everything with my choice of software.
Re:The true price of media is revealed! (Score:2)
Are you sure about that? Advertisers pay millions of dollars during an hour's TV. And that doesn't even include other sources of income that are derived from the show.
Re:The true price of media is revealed! (Score:3, Interesting)
"For example, a 30-second spot during the 2005 Superbowl sold for $2.4 million. Commercials during less-watched programs are more affordable, but the cost of those commercials may still run in excess of $100,000 per 30-seconds."
About 95 million people watched the Superbowl. That would seem to put it at much less than $1/viewer, or about 2.5 cents (1.25p in real money). Considering they want to charge a few pounds per program...
Re:The true price of media is revealed! (Score:2)
Not even full episodes (Score:3, Insightful)
The ad-supported downloads don't even appear to be full episodes of the G4 shows, just segments. These are already available for free via G4's podcasts, so why in the world would anyone want to go through the trouble of downloading them over bittorrent?
Plus, to make matters worse, the download rate was only 65K/sec, which is pretty very slow for my internet connection. The video quality wasn't even that good, something that would have made the bittorrent.com version better than the podcast version.
Bittorrent.com really needs to stop treating their potential customers like idiots and offer some incentive to use their products instead of the competition. The fact that they use the bittorrent protocol should lower their costs on the bandwidth side, but it increases the complexity on the customer's side. They really need to do something to make up for that (much lower prices or extremely high quality).
Eh? (Score:0)
Make ads people want to download (Score:5, Insightful)
Look at all the ads that are on YouTube as content and actively downloaded. Even on my PVR I rewind and watch again good commercials. The problem with advertising and IPTV is that they force stupid, annoying, and pointless ads in a shotgun fashion assuming a captive audience. Run creative ads and use search terms and the like to target them. I figure Google is going to clean up big time on this on YouTube very soon.
I'm a single guy who doesn't drive but loves anime. If they would kill all the car ads, and the tampon ads and run anime and asian film ads I'd be as happy as a clam, toss in a link to the online store or ticket purchase and I'd be even happier. My democracy player downloads these ads automatically.
In the same fashion NewType magazine runs a DVD in every issue which has about three single anime episodes and a pile of trailers. While it's effectively pure advertising, its one of the most popular features, and when they discontinued it, readers made them bring it back. I've ended up buying many entire series based on the previews on those disks. That's focused and effective advertising.
The most effective email advertising I've ever encountered is the favorites search option on eBay. I get emails on a regular basis for stuff I'm actively seeking. I read every email and end up purchasing a reasonable percentage of items.
Re:Make ads people want to download (Score:1)
Goog commercials? Sir, such a thing does not exist.
Television producers should move to torrents (Score:1)
Television producers should move to bittorrent (Score:2, Insightful)
I totally foresee a future in which bittorrent becomes the "mainstream" medium, television is rendered obsolete, and big-name television producers stop "broadcasting" shows, they just upload them to bittorrent -- with the commercial breaks put right into the video file.
As it is now, when people rip video from television and upload it, they take the time to remove the commercials -- because hey, you're already going to all of the trouble to rip it, upload it, and attach your name to it, why not make it quality? Pirating is all about your rep.
But if the producers just played into the torrent fad, then no one would have to rip the videos themselves -- and since the videos are being handed to people on a silver platter, my guess is that no one would bother to take the time to recut the video to be commercial-free and upload it again to another torrent (which would be illegal and probably have less seeds/leeches as a result). Of course, people would probably be quite likely to skip the commercials while watching, but whether or not they skip them would probably depend on the product being advertised -- a commercial would probably have about 5 seconds to grab the viewer's attention, lest it be skipped. Since you're uploading these programs to the internet (and don't have to deal with the cable provider), you can pick and choose your own targeted advertising ... I wonder how advertising for shows gets
picked now?
Also, it isn't as if people don't "skip" the commercials on television already -- they walk away to use the bathroom, get something to eat, or even just change the channel until the commercials are over.
Doesn't this sound like a win-win situation? The consumers get the product for free, whenever they want it, and the producers reach a MUCH larger audience with their advertising (thereby increasing advertising revenues -- also, since the popularity of a torrent can easily be gauged by keeping track of how many people have/are downloading it, the popularity of a torrent could become the new "ratings" system, determining how valuable getting commercials onto that file would be for an advertiser).
One final thing, I wonder how much cheaper it would be to upload a TV show onto bittorrent than it would be to get it on a cable channel? I don't know all of the specifics, but it seems totally feasible that the television producers could make more money than they do now by using free torrents to distribute their shows -- even while providing the product for free! After all, free product = more users = better advertising profits.
PS Sorry about double-posting, I tend to forget paragraph tags when I'm excited about an idea.
Re:Television producers should move to bittorrent (Score:2)
This already happens with TiVo -- but they've moved on to the next thing already: Sliders. Audiovisual ads which invade a RUNNING show and take up a quarter of the screen WHILE YOU'RE TRYING TO WATCH THE SHOW.
I simply refuse to pay for cable TV anymore. My MythTV box sits idle, given up in favor of BitTorrent. At least if I get a DVD rip, there aren't going to be ads plastered all over the video.
Not much, for the shows that I want to watch. Think about it -- most of the cost of Firefly probably did not go into getting it on the air. Most of it probably went into actually building the ship, 3D models, actors, etc.
Oh, it would be a lot, just not significant, especially considering they're giving up having the network promote them.
Now, for advertising, think about the Mac/PC commercials. Most geeks either love them or hate them, and the more vocal ones lately seem to hate them. But it goes to show you: Make an ad they actually want to watch, and they'll watch it. Seems to me advertisers could just cut out the middleman that way.
I don't want ad-supported TV, either. I don't want a lot of cheap, crappy shows stuffed to the gills with advertising. I want one or two really good shows -- something like Firefly, something I'll want to watch over and over again. I want to pay more for it, and I want it not to have ads, ever.
After all, I don't watch enough TV for too many shows to matter. Why pay for 300 channels 24/7, when I'm only going to watch 1 at a time, and only for an hour or two at night?
Actual datapoints (Score:2)
From the "Still NOT Getting It Dept." (Score:1)
Advertising Downloads... (Score:1)
Hmmm...download free stuff for just the price of seeing a few ads. Its brilliant!! Hey we could call it Adware...
Oh, wait...Never mind.