Daylight Saving Change Saved No Power 766
Brett writes "Results from energy companies are coming in, and the word is that moving Daylight Saving Time forward three weeks had no measurable impact on power consumption. The attempt by the US Congress to make it look like they were doing something about the energy crisis has been exposed as the waste it is. But the new DST is probably here to stay — letting the bill expire would mean re-patching a lot of systems again next year. So much for saving energy."
Never mind lost productivity... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Fine by me... (Score:1, Informative)
The reason we do it is that people are more likely to shop if they get off work and it is still light out, and thus it is a way to subsidize retail and related industries (the theoretical energy savings are based on the assumption that businesses won't change their schedule and will consume constant power, but the people staying out shopping won't go home and turn on their home appliances.)
Modded funny? (Score:5, Informative)
Seriously, this "useful" change was nothing but a waste of time, AND clocks. All those clocks/devices that automatically change according to the standardized time? Useless. Software patches? Quite impossible for most.
Looks like the waste management facilities will see a rise in borked electronics because of this - and that does precisely 0 for the environment, too.
Re:Are you high? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' (Score:4, Informative)
A number of countries followed suit out of necessity to stay synchronized with U.S. businesses, rather than because of any particular support for the idea.
Re:Never mind lost productivity... (Score:3, Informative)
Even before this change, there was a difference in the start dates of Daylight Saving and Summer Time across the Atlantic; for the last decade, it was a one week difference at the start. Before then, all hell broke loose across Europe, as different countries started and ended at different times. Most of the world outside Europe and North America doesn't bother with EVER changing their clocks, but those in the Southern Hemisphere that DO observe Daylight Saving do so roughly 180 days out of phase with the Northern Hemisphere. The time deltas between two points on the globe can differ by many hours (up to three!) throughout the year due to DST changes. Dealing with an international scientific collaboration as I do sensitizes you to the insanity of DST rather rapidly :-)
Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' (Score:3, Informative)
Dude, this is the previous (Republican controlled) Congress we're talking about. They spent the vast majority of their time on vacation. They convened for fewer days than any Congress in a hundred years. I suppose they could have used the time spent debating this bill to do something meaningful, but they weren't exactly hurting for time.
PG&E made some money from me (Score:2, Informative)
For me this meant that the "part-peak" tariff ran from 6pm to 9pm, instead of from 5pm to 8pm for the past three weeks. This cost me two ways:
1) Electricity generated by my solar PV system between 5pm and 6pm spun the meter backwards counting off-peak kWh instead of part-peak kWh.
2) I use very little power from 5pm to 6pm (I'm generally not home from work), I definitely use more from 8pm to 9pm (I'm home, and it is dark so I have lights on). So moving the part-peak time an hour later meant that I bought more of the higher priced power than the cheaper off-peak power.
-Tony
end DST (Score:3, Informative)
STANDARDTIME.COM SAYS: If we are saving energy let's go year round with Daylight Savings Time. If we are not saving energy let's drop Daylight Savings Time! [standardtime.com]
Enough of this daylight time, reset-the-clocks insanity. Just stop the madness.
Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' (Score:3, Informative)
This would cause problems in northern latitudes during the winter. The sun potentially wouldn't rise until very late in the morning, which would be tres suck. The last time they tried this was during WWII, and there was a noted rise in the early morning accident rate in the winter. Of course, you could also partially blame that on the blackouts, but then without War Time the blackouts wouldn't have had as much impact in the later morning hours.
Congress member names (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Never mind lost productivity... (Score:3, Informative)
I live in California, so I'm on pacific time. Brazil's major cities are, IIRC, two time zones ahead of eastern time. So if I know the time in California, how do I figure out the time in Brazil? Well, I have to know what day of the year it is. It's 5 time zones ahead of me, but it can either 5 hours ahead during the times of the year when the US has switched its time and Brazil hasn't yet switched theirs. Or it can be 4 (US summer) or 6 (Brazilian summer) if both have switched.
If we got rid of this nonsense, Brazil would be 5 hours ahead. Period.
Re:alternatively... (Score:3, Informative)
The shortest day of the year happens on STANDARD TIME.. DST has no affect on the shortest day of the year!
Re:Don't foget about October.... (for the children (Score:3, Informative)
So stupid. I was never molested when trick-or-treating as a child because the predators couldn't see me in the dark.
On the Flip Side (Score:4, Informative)
On the flip side, however, it means that there's six more weeks in the year when it is still dark when we go to work... the other side of the coin.
Re:alternatively... (Score:3, Informative)
that's impractical, unfortunately (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Fine by me... (Score:5, Informative)
Global brightening is real! (Score:4, Informative)
Here's the original article on this subject, from June 2006:
http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~mann/shared/articles/Ma
Re:Valid reason to know local noon.. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Change your schedule, not my clock (Score:3, Informative)
Problem solved.
Re:Never mind lost productivity... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Fine by me... (Score:2, Informative)
Earthhour (Score:2, Informative)
Re:It wasted power on my end (Score:3, Informative)
That would make my server a NTP level 3 and my clients level 4. 4 Deviations of time off of nasa... Not too shabby.
Re:Our patching is done as well. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Our patching is done as well. (Score:1, Informative)
but if they are they'd better patch Solaris 10.
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetk
Let me check the year, oh yeah, 2007!
Re:Fine by me... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:It was mostly about peak shaving, I thought (Score:4, Informative)
You're right that it travels to the earlier morning hours, but what travels is not the peak usage but the net difference in energy usage. So the evening hours are still peak use time - people are still going to use much more energy prepping dinner/watching evening tv/checking blogs than in the morning - but the morning peak has increased slightly. The afternoon/evening peak energy use is also usually reflected in the electricity prices, so it costs the consumer more per unit of energy in the afternoon and evening than it does in the early morning. So while there is not a net energy savings, there may be some cost savings. Granted, it will be miniscule to the average household energy consumer, but it is present. Unfortunately the way we tend to work in the US is if we have anything "extra" we decide it must be there to use, instead of save. And as others have stated, there is probably more of a cost in lost productivity because of the bi-annual clock change than a net savings of anything one would care to measure.
Personally I've always been of the mind that after electric lighting went into widespread use it was time to do away with DST one way or another, I'd prefer to just set the clocks ahead 30 minutes one year to split the difference then never change them again.