Diebold Goes 0 For 3 In Massachusetts Case 119
beetle496 writes "ComputerWorld reports that last week a judge denied Diebold's request to block ES&S pact with Massachusetts. This is a follow-up to the earlier discussion here after Diebold contended that the state had erred in selecting the machines of its rival, citing accessibility provisions of the HAVA law. Quoting: 'Diebold's request for an injunction to block the execution of the contract with ES&S was rejected... The judge also denied Diebold's request to have an accelerated discovery process and to keep the state's legal team from viewing internal Diebold documents... "The suit is still there, but they went zero for three yesterday," the spokesman said.' The actual accessibility concerns have been discussed over at the TEITAC listserv, including a few telling observations from experts familiar with accessible voting and at least one state insider."
Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
Diebold is the SCO of politics (Score:4, Funny)
Of course... (Score:3, Funny)
Oh...right... well, *ahem* let's just hope their court case continues to..uhhh... die boldly?
Re:Diebold should just (Score:5, Funny)
We all know how easy it is to access a Diebold machine!
On the brightside (Score:4, Funny)
Re:first post (Score:3, Funny)
I wonder if it was wise for
Re:Score.. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Same Sh*t, Different Flies (Score:3, Funny)
Re:use twice as many monkeys (Score:1, Funny)
Strange, their ftp server doesn't seem to be up.
Re:Diebold should just (Score:3, Funny)
A crowbar will do nicely.