Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Books Media

Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Dies At 84 380

At least twenty-two readers took the trouble to make sure we knew that Kurt Vonnegut has died at 84. From the Times obituary: "Kurt Vonnegut, whose dark comic talent and urgent moral vision in novels like 'Slaughterhouse-Five,' 'Cat's Cradle' and 'God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater' caught the temper of his times and the imagination of a generation, died last night in Manhattan... Mr. Vonnegut suffered irreversible brain injuries as a result of a fall several weeks ago, according to his wife, Jill Krementz." Reader SPK adds: "He will be remembered not only as a great writer, but also as a staunch civil libertarian (long-term member of the ACLU) and as a 'mainstream/literary' author who integrated science fiction concepts into his writing. So it goes."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Dies At 84

Comments Filter:
  • So it goes (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Megane ( 129182 ) on Thursday April 12, 2007 @10:18AM (#18701903)
    My best Vonnegut moment was when I was watching that Rodney Dangerfield movie "Back To School" in a theatre. In one scene, there's a knock at the door, and Rodney opens the door, and it's a curly-haired guy who is his tutor for the writings of Vonnegut. That's when I started laughing. Three seconds later, after he says that he is Kurt Vonnegut, the rest of the audience starts laughing.
  • Vonnegut's Asshole (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Mondo1287 ( 622491 ) on Thursday April 12, 2007 @10:19AM (#18701909)
    Vonnegut's Asshole -> * One of my favorite authors. I own more of his books than anyone else's.
  • Tralfamadore (Score:3, Interesting)

    by digitalhermit ( 113459 ) on Thursday April 12, 2007 @10:21AM (#18701933) Homepage
    Now two of my favorite authors, Douglas Adams and Kurt Vonnegut, are dead. They both managed to intertwine a strange philosophy in their novels. For Vonnegut, I've always enjoyed the glimpses into Tralfamadorean philosophy. "We are all bugs trapped in amber" they said. It was impossible to ascribe morality to any act. It just is. The easy reading of this idea may say that there's no evil, no good and by following that thread, no God or heaven. But what it really suggests is an idea from antiquity to Marlowe to Conrad to taoism. We are. We must do all that we can on this earth and not let some vague idea of good/bad determine our actions. We must live according to our own personal code.

    God bless you, Mr. Vonnegut.
  • right and wrong exists, i know that and you know that. what you are really saying is that you want to determine what is right and wrong, not some questionably motivated external entity determining it for you

    but the problem is, in your words above, there seems to be a rationale for saying that there is no such thing as right and wrong at all. i know you don't mean that, but if you parse your words above, and look carefully at what you actually say, and what you neglect to say, then you can see how your words might give those who mean ill in this world some satisfaction that you don't have a problem with them

    i know what you really mean, but you have to be more careful. you have to be careful what you say, at the very least, so that you don't reinforce a stereotype: the moralizers and social conservatives who are talibanesque in their thinking and atttitudes, they look at the words you wrote above and they find a reason to attack you and paint you as an enemy because your words seem to profess nihilism. so the type of people we both dislike now have an excuse and a renewed sense of determination on attempting to foist their narrow-minded "morals" on you

    what you really mean is that you don't share their agenda for, example, denying homosexuals marriage, or denying women abortion, or keeping marijuana illegal, or punishing people for adultery as if it were a capital offense. but in your words above, it almost looks like you don't care if people are murdered right in front of you. of course you don't mean that, but do you see how your words can be parsed that way? especially by the likes of the maerican taliban?

    what you don't care for are the moralizers, those who would invade your personal life in the name of their simple-minded fundamentalist attitudes. good for you, i agree with you. but you need to speak more clearly, or you only give such people reason to paint you with their stereotypical brushes as a nihilist. you can see in your words above how they might think what you really mean is you don't care about anything or anyone at all
  • by Philip K Dickhead ( 906971 ) <folderol@fancypants.org> on Thursday April 12, 2007 @11:05AM (#18702325) Journal
    Tiger got to hunt
    Eagle got to fly
    Man got to ask his self
    Why, why, why?

    Tiger got to sleep
    Eagle got to land
    Man got to tell his self
    He Understand

    --Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle
  • by kripkenstein ( 913150 ) on Thursday April 12, 2007 @11:57AM (#18703183) Homepage

    [...] the sign says something to the effect of "Men were created to worship God." [...] how insecure does God have to be to go to all the trouble of creating an entirely new species just to tell him how great he is?
    Well, you correctly see that possibility as ridiculous. But monotheists (the 3 major monotheistic religions are perhaps similar enough in that respect) would also see it as ridiculous. So really, you are misunderstanding what they mean when they put up a sign saying "Men were created to worship God."

    It isn't that an omnoipotent god benefits from it somehow, of course he doesn't. To say otherwise is blasphemy, even, for monotheists. However, they believe that the natural state for human beings is to worship god. In other words, people benefit from worshipping god, not vice versa. Note that the quoted sign can be understood both ways.

    Of course, you can raise skeptical doubt about why god would create people at all, and why worshipping him would be good for them. Such doubts are natural, and indeed the major monotheistic religions have had centuries of debate about these topics. So, my point is that the monotheistic belief system (speaking generally) makes more sense than your misinterpretation of that particular sign.

    (To prevent misunderstandings, I am a complete atheist.)
  • by DjMd ( 541962 ) on Thursday April 12, 2007 @12:44PM (#18704017) Journal
    Vonnegut from "God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater,"
    "Hello, babies. Welcome to Earth. It's hot in the summer and cold in the winter. It's round and wet and crowded. At the outside, babies, you've got about a hundred years here. There's only one rule that I know of, babies - 'God damn it, you've got to be kind.' "

    my feeble attempt at an epitaph

    "Goodbye, Mr. Vonnegut. God bless you, Mr. Vonnegut.
    You told us about ice, you told us about fire. You made us laugh and taught us to think. Your time here was too short. But you gave us a lot more than one rule, you gave us someone to root for."

    I'm sorry its no Vonnegut...
  • by BakaHoushi ( 786009 ) <Goss DOT Sean AT gmail DOT com> on Thursday April 12, 2007 @12:50PM (#18704147) Homepage
    In my professional opinion (and by professional, I mean "one I came up with while eating cookies at my desk and not working on an essay due in several hours"), people say it because it makes them feel like their life has a purpose. Doing good in the name of the Lord gives a reason for life. A reason to get up in the morning. They can HELP someone, and they KNOW it has to be a good reason, because, like, God told them to, supposedly.

    At least, that's what I've figured out from listening to some of my relatives. Me, on the other hand... I'm agnostic, because I can't say there's NO chance that there is a God... but really, to me, I think the universe can be summed up in two words: Shit happens.

    My aunt told me there must be a God because she couldn't face the world if there weren't. I didn't say this to her, but I thought, "Well, good for you. But, guess what: The Universe doesn't give a flying fuck about what you, or I, or anyone for that matter, thinks about it. If you gave up on life, the world would keep spinning, gravity would keep on pulling, men would be men, women would be women, and small blue creatures from Alpha Centauri would still be small blue creatures from Alpha Centauri." (Apologies to Douglas Adams for that last bit)

    Basically, I believe the very concept of "meaning" is a human invention. Deer, fish, and elephants don't really care why they exist. They just do. But humans have grown intelligent enough (well, some of us, anyway) to ask "why are we here?" Unfortunately, there's no Intergalactic or Interdimensional phonebook to let us ask potential Creators or other races their opinions. So, humans had to make their own reasons, or else it got very depressing to think we'd suffer in life for no real reason and then just die.

    Thus, if humans "created" meaning to feel better, we can say there really was no meaning before us...

    Oh, if you can't tell, I'm a real SMASH at parties. I really brighten up the room.
  • by rworsnop ( 1012283 ) on Thursday April 12, 2007 @01:03PM (#18704367)
    From Slaughterhouse 5. Billy is having one of his "episodes" whilst watching television:

    "American planes, full of holes and wounded men and corpses took off backwards from an airfield in England. Over France, a few German fighter planes flew at them backwards, sucked bullets and shell fragments from some of the planes and crewmen. They did the same for wrecked American bombers on the ground, and those planes flew up backwards to join the formation.

    "The formation flew backwards over a German city that was in flames. The bombers opened their bomb bay doors, exerted a miraculous magnetism which shrunk the fires, gathered them into cylindrical steel containers, and lifted the containers into the bellies of the planes.

    "When the bombers got back to their base, the steel cylinders were taken from the racks and shipped back to the United States of America, where factories were operating night and day, dismantling the cylinders, separating the dangerous contents into minerals. ... The minerals were them shipped to specialists in remote areas. It was their business to put them into the ground, to hide them cleverly, so they would never hurt anybody ever again.

    "The American fliers turned in their uniforms, became high school kids."
  • by deepestblue ( 206649 ) <slashdot@FORTRAN ... t minus language> on Thursday April 12, 2007 @03:11PM (#18706631)

    I just wanted to call out what I perceived as Western bias (I'm not from the "West", which I admit is itself a dubious term).

    Well, the definition is fairly standard, based on size basically, giving you Christianity, Islam and Judaism.

    Sikhism has 1.5 times as many adherents as Judaism (no, I'm not Sikh either).

    I was just using the standard shortened version for "Christianity, Islam and Judaism"

    The fact that you think this is "standard" says it all.

    P.S. A better term might be Abrahamic religions.

  • by Fallingcow ( 213461 ) on Thursday April 12, 2007 @04:05PM (#18707505) Homepage
    Typical anything is not very good.
  • by natophonic ( 103088 ) on Thursday April 12, 2007 @05:25PM (#18709157)
    Ah yes. If only our youth would concern themselves not with creativity, non-conformity, and critical thinking, but instead the Virtues and Values befitting a Christian Nation. Instead of wasting their minds upon the disspative slanders of a crypto-communist like Vonnegut, it would behoove them to instead read a Great Book by an Excellent Mind. [amazon.com]

Nothing happens.

Working...