Internet Blackout Threat for Music Thieves in AU 244
An anonymous reader writes "News.com.au is reporting that the ARIA [Australia's Version of the RIAA] is making plans to have ISPs cancel or terminate the accounts of those who download music illegally. If the user is on dialup, that's not a problem: their telephone line will be disconnected. 'Fed up with falling sales, the industry — which claims Australians download more than one billion songs illegally each year — has been discussing tough new guidelines with internet service providers (ISPs) since late last year. The music industry is lobbying for a three strikes and you're out policy to enforce their copyright. Under this system, people who illegally download songs would be given three written warnings by their Internet service provider. If they continued to illegally download songs, their internet account would be suspended or terminated.'"
Say goodbye to the Blacksmiths of this century (Score:5, Insightful)
Why would ISPs agree to this? I can imagine it now, a group of ISPs implement this and then customers flock to the small ISPs who aren't big enough to warrent attention from the ARIA. Faced with a slump in revenue the ISPs reverse course and try to win customers back.
Let's not get started on SSL encrypted DCC transfers on IRC channels or private FTP servers! That's going to be almost impossible to track. These kind of darknets (as I've seen them called) or going to be very hard to shut-down!
Does this even matter anyway? My friend from Canada brought over his personal collection on a 320Gig drive when he visited this week. This is getting more and more common, people now have so much portable storage that it's often easier to swap collections and cherry pick the songs you like (or take the whole collection if you prefer). Compared to downloading, this is a far safer way to pirate on a huge quantity of music.
At some point, their revenues will become so small that they start to lose credibility. A case in point, where are the blacksmiths' guilds today? This whole issue with trundle on for some time to come but the inevitable will eventually happen. Time is on our sides, my friends.
Simon
so, let's fight this with illegal tactics? (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe this is okay and/or legal in AU. Is this legal in the US? What about due process? What about overdue process?
Anecdotally, as an aside, I had on my mind about three artists (new artists, e.g., Paolo Nutini), and hence, three cds I set out to find and purchase. Circuit City, no dice (didn't really plan on buying there what with their recent employee abuse program) -- they had about 1/4 the number of racked cds than last time I'd looked there. Best Buy, sorry. And the local CD store, nope! No selection, nothing. I don't know which came first the chicken or the egg, I don't even know which is which, but my thirst for new music is about the same as before -- but recently I'm finding I can't buy cds as before.
I'm not buying the "pirates decrease sales" spiel. My cause and effect for buying fewer cds is strictly the continued unavailability of cds on display. It used to be a smörgåsbord, now the stores look like the cutout bins of years past. This (the RIAA, and others) is an industry that rather than weather a business model storm and changing business dynamics to adapt continues to insist on taking their ball home with them (hey, it isn't even their ball!) so we can't play. And somehow, they still want to demand we pay them. Please, please, please!, just let them become irrelevant quickly so we can get on with our music!
How... (Score:4, Insightful)
Scare tactics as usual (Score:5, Insightful)
In any case, the implementation is sure to be a nightmare: families with shared accounts, botnets, and false-positive identification will make enforcement difficult, even if the ISPs actually wanted to comply. Which I doubt they do. Do ISPs have "common carrier" status is *.au? If so, they will be loathe to jeopardize it.
Re:Monopolies prevent this (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't see why ISP's would agree to do this. It's right up there with... Load gun -> aim at foot -> Fire!
Out of their mind? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:What if I own the CD's with the songs I'm DL'in (Score:2, Insightful)
I almost hope something like this succeeds (Score:5, Insightful)
(Almost.) If a system like this were put in place and rigorously enforced, and after a year the Australian music industry still saw declining sales, it would put a pretty big nail in the coffin of the "our industry is dying because of you filthy pirates" argument. The industry goons will not stop bleating that until it becomes such a ridiculous claim that any reasonable person reacts to it with derisive laughter instead of seriously considering it.
If, on the other hand -- unlikely though I think it is -- their sales shot up all of a sudden, then people like me would be forced to admit we were wrong. Which honestly I'll be happy to do if there are convincing hard numbers that contradict my point of view.
On the other hand, it's not worth causing so much trouble to so many people just to test a theory, which is why I'm only "almost" in favor of this.
fine if... (Score:5, Insightful)
"...more than one billion songs..." (Score:3, Insightful)
So, each Internet user [internetworldstats.com] in Australia is down loading more than 100 songs a year? Sounds like the usual hype, smoke, mirrors and bs the riaa uses in the US.
Slash-egos prevent this (Score:1, Insightful)
Unsurprisingly slasdot wouldn't. Seeing other POVs isn't a strong point around here, so I'll help you out. Bandwith hogs* is a valid reason. Get rid of the illegal traffic clogging the networks and money is saved all around.
*And to cover the follow-up complaints. One people who abuse the networks aren't customers, and two no one else will want them either so running to someone else will not work. And last I don't think they're as big a group as chest-beaters would like to think. Oh and as far as the "competition" angle. Well all you abusers please feel free to start your own "pirates" ISP. A heavy dose of reality is long overdue for all of you.
Re:Luckily, the alternatives aren't that bad (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Monopolies prevent this (Score:5, Insightful)
In the States that's the fastest way to bring on an anti-monoploy suit. What are the legal ramifications of a non-government organization that could "cut you off" form a significant section of society? Will the ISP hold a "trial" to allow the customer to deny or defend the charges?
Re:so, let's fight this with illegal tactics? (Score:5, Insightful)
They're dreaming (Score:1, Insightful)
Australia also has unbundled services - your internet connection is separate from your telephone service.
Bottom line:- if your ISP cuts you off, they can't stop your telephone (even if they are the same company)) and you just go elsewhere.
Re:Slash-egos prevent this (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Say goodbye to the Blacksmiths of this century (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:What if I own the CD's with the songs I'm DL'in (Score:3, Insightful)
If you think about it for a minute, this is basically pure extortion by the labels against the ISPs "Do what we say (read: Give us money.), or we will put you out of business." The ISPs really have no choice but to fight, because if they continue to pay blackmail to the labels they'll eventually be forced out of business. Again, make no mistake, the labels want the ISPs to give them a pile of money. This isn't about "enforcement" of any "laws". They simply see the ISPs as a juicier target that's easier to sue. This strategy hasn't worked in the USA, where telecom companies have a lot of power, so they're trying it in Australia were media is considerably more powerful.
Re:What if I own the CD's with the songs I'm DL'in (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:I almost hope something like this succeeds (Score:1, Insightful)
Noone can understand RIAA (ARIA/etc) "creative accounting" as currently practiced - so the figures are easily fudged.
Re:The RIAAs Rights (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Say goodbye to the Blacksmiths of this century (Score:5, Insightful)
We already see this. There's a clear trend from sharing a single song by a single artist, then to sharing a complete album by a single artist, and then onwards to sharing complete discographies of artists, aslong as discs keep growing this trend will continue. I can easily see "every-album-that-was-in-the-charts-this-year.zip" and it's not even that much of a stretch to imagine "every-album-that-was-in-the-charts-this-decade"
At 200kbps (more or less the needed bandwith for indistinguishalbe-from-cd sound for most people) one hour of music takes up 90MB. An average song perhaphs 7MB. Which means that, for example, the complete content of iTunes (the store, not the program), will take up around 7MB times 3.5 million, which is about 25TB.
Today that's nontrivial, common discs today hold only half a TB or so, so you'd need 50 discs. But discs double in capacity (for the same price) about every 2 years, so that means it's about a dozen years until that entire library, 3.5 million songs, fit on a single standard consumer hard-disc. (yeah yeah, we don't know that the future will play out like that, but it seems a reasonable guess, even if it slowed down it's hard to imagine it'd take more than double that or so)
If RIAA et al think they have a hard time with simple copying now, wait and see what happens when 25TB is a trivial amount of disc-space. They are *so* fucked. I'm not saying its rigth or wrong. I'm just saying it IS so.
Directly contradicts this report... (Score:3, Insightful)