Disney - Blu-ray's Fair Weather Friend 138
An anonymous reader writes "One day they're out, the next day they're in. Back in March, Disney CEO Bob Iger seemed to indicate that his company (which has exclusively backed Blu-ray since the start of the high-def format war) was on the verge of supporting *both* high-def formats. What a difference a couple of months of good press for Blu-ray makes: this week, the CEO reversed his earlier position, saying 'the single greatest thing we can do right now is to not waffle, but to be very, very blunt about it, (and) to continue our support of Blu-ray because we sense a real advantage.'"
Re:Doesn't mention the little problem of broken DR (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I Don't Get It (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Doesn't mention the little problem of broken DR (Score:5, Interesting)
If they make a loss on an $600 unit which is crippled compared to a PC, it's one of the worst corporate inefficiencies in today's world. For the same price, you can buy a used car, pay a rent for a 2 bedroom apartment in many parts of the country, get a decent desktop from Dell or feed 100 children in India for a month. Don't tell me 100 parents can not assemble one playstation 3 in a month.
good months for blu-ray (Score:2, Interesting)
More likely, it's due to a couple of bad weeks for HD-DVD (security keeps getting cracked). That'd be more motivation for keeping to the other one if I was an idiot executive. Who cares if one gives a better quality video? One of them is still capable of manipulating our customers^W^W^W protecting our content.
Re:Dual-speak (Score:2, Interesting)
Console buyers should have anticipated the eventual emergence of multi-format players. Also, Disney announced their loyalty to Blu-Ray some time ago. Anyone who really wanted to watch Disney movies on their gaming console pretty much had to go PS3.
Re:You gotta wonder... (Score:4, Interesting)
Communication is always a problem when you have different languages and cultures. This is why French became the language of Diplomacy since (I think) 1700's since the language was basically codified such that it was very difficult to misinterpret. Of course that did not stop some of the most horrendous wars in history it just made it easier to tell the other guy you did not like him and why.
Re:Disney's largest shareholder.... (Score:3, Interesting)
Yeah, what's up with that? Could anybody explain? One minute Apple is crying [slashdot.org] from the rooftops [slashdot.org] that DRM is bad, the next they're totally supporting a format that's laden [wikipedia.org] with it (even moreso than HD-DVD). Why couldn't they just not express a preference at all...?
Re:Disney's largest shareholder.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Ha, captcha 'cultural'
Re:Doesn't mention the little problem of broken DR (Score:2, Interesting)
1.) Given the parts, I doubt they could assemble it.
2.) I doubt much of the cost comes from assembly.
I don't care which one wins (Score:3, Interesting)
I want enough space on a burnable disc so I can capture all my video (all SD and all lo-fi) with a lossless scheme. Only THEN will I toss my old tapes and not give it a second thought. Then I can experiment with different codecs until the cows come home and know I didn't sacrifice anything from the originals. I'll probably only actually do that on a handfull of the recordings I have, but hey, you never know. Someday one of my grandkids-to-be might develop an intense interest in a vacation I took years ago to Wally World. More likely is that all my precious footage will end up in a landfill somewhere. Such is the life of a pack rat.
End of the Box Set (Score:3, Interesting)
Yeah, it's all about capacity. OK, and name too. 'HD-DVD' is too tied to HD programming. 'Blu-ray' is just a name - if they will sell me a season of 24 on a single Blu-Ray disc, in SD, I'm buying. I care far more for the amount of shelf space it will take up than being able to see the pores on Kiefer Sutherland's face. (OK, if they want to do it in 720p and call it 'HD' - whatever, I don't care).
And if they're smart enough to sell it for $24, that'll just be a marketing coup.