Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Star Wars Prequels Media Movies Television

CG Television Clone Wars Trailer Released 201

Ant writes "The official Star Wars site has up the one minute and 50 second trailer for the upcoming computer rendered Clone Wars." I'm still not sold on the CG, but the models seem to be somewhat based on Genndy Tartakovsky's designs from the original Clone Wars series. Wikipedia offers a bevy of details on the series.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

CG Television Clone Wars Trailer Released

Comments Filter:
  • by bigtomrodney ( 993427 ) * on Sunday May 27, 2007 @05:12PM (#19294609)
    I can't say I'm sold on this. I enjoyed the Clone Wars cartoon series but even as a die hard Star Wars fan I feel this is flogging a dead horse. Lucas should have his special effects taken away from him and be sent to his room until he remembers how to make a good film (or in this case series).

    The saddest thing is that despite my protest I'm sure I'll watch it, secretly hoarde some action figures from the series and own every reissue of the new Clone Wars boxset for the next twenty years.
  • by Gopal.V ( 532678 ) on Sunday May 27, 2007 @05:25PM (#19294745) Homepage Journal

    Dexter's laboratory, Samurai Jack and Powerpuff Girls are enough to establish his genius [dotgnu.info]. But he managed to turn around my opinion [dotgnu.info] about Star Wars (as someone born in the eighties and having got a TV in the nineties) - while reinforcing my low opinion of George Lucas's later work. Samurai Jack is really another example of a long epic saga, minimalistically drawn, yet full of life, twists and curve balls.

    Hopefully, they borrow the good parts from his work and not go all CG centric over the story telling part.

  • Re:Eh, CG... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Zonk (troll) ( 1026140 ) on Sunday May 27, 2007 @05:42PM (#19294879)
    I wouldn't have a problem with CG if there was a single example of CG that didn't have awful motion. The best CG I've seen was Gollum in LOTR, but that's because they had an actor do the motion. Still, the way thing were rendered like hair movement, water dripping, etc looked really fake and was very distracting.

    Personally, I'd rather see South Park, Terrance & Phillip, Clerks, etc style animation instead of CG. Something similar to Batman Beyond would be pretty cool for this.

    I like animation, hell, most of what I watch is animated (South Park, Family Guy, Simpsons, Aqua Teen Hunger Force, etc). CG just really annoys me.
  • by jmac1492 ( 1036880 ) on Sunday May 27, 2007 @05:58PM (#19294981)
    Actually, some of the older video games getting redone (X-Wing? TIE Fighter? Dark Forces?) wouldn't be a bad idea.
  • I'm really looking forward to this. I loved the original Clone Wars and I'm looking forward to this release as well. At least it's a significant change, as opposed to those re-releases in the 1990s of the original trilogy (original, thx, ones with previews of episode 1, etc). You know, you can love something AND like it's remake as well. Remakes can be awesome too (sometimes even superior). Some examples of great remakes:

    Music:
    Hard to Handle (Otis Redding/Black Crowes)
    Come Together (Beatles/Aerosmith)
    Hurt (Nine Inch Nails/Johnny Cash)
    Twist And Shout (Top Notes/Beatles)
    Time is on my Side (Irma Thomas/Rolling Stones)
    The Man Who Sold the World (David Bowie/Nirvana)
    Mr. Tambourine Man (Bob Dylan/William Shatner) - just kidding :)

    Movies:
    Cape Fear
    Dawn of the Dead

    Oceans 11
    The Thing (I'll argue it is a remake)
    Scarface

    So everyone just relax and reserve judgment until you actually see it. I know how hard that is, especially on the Internets, to not review a movie 8 months before it comes out based on 5 screenshots or something, but let's at least, um... try? If you didn't like the original, then you probably won't like this one. But if you did like Genndy's version and you're already reserving judgment, then right now you're just being close-minded (even if you do wind up disliking it later). Liking both isn't a mortal sin.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27, 2007 @06:39PM (#19295291)
    I clicked the link and ended up here:

    http://starwars.com/noflash.html [starwars.com]

    The 'Click here to get a modern browser'-link points to http://www.mozilla.org/ [mozilla.org].

    I was kind of surprised.
  • Why use CG actors? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by dircha ( 893383 ) on Sunday May 27, 2007 @07:24PM (#19295587)
    Why use CG actors when you can use cheap, often unknown human actors? Star Wars has never been about the acting; it's about the story and the style.

    Mark Hamill was an unknown, very mediocre actor who only managed to pull off the part in spite of the horrible dialogue because his naivete played in his favor.

    Hayden Christensen, also an unkown, in this case with horrible acting skills, couldn't salvage the atrocious dialogue because he was the villain and came off as a bratty prick, not as someone the audience identified with.

    Further, having CG actors doesn't allow you to do anything you couldn't with human actors. Audiences fell in love with the original trilogy because they could identify with the heroes. Star Wars doesn't need flying green yodas and mortal combat robots. In the original trilogy the supernatural Force powers were natural-seeming extensions of ordinary people who rose to the occassion to accomplish extraordinary things because of their humanity, not in spite of it, and not by gimmicks or arcade fighting moves.

    But then any ability to relate to the characters was pretty much ruined by Mr. Lucas explaining away everything in terms of bio-technological elitism.

    The duel between Obi-Wan and Darth Vader in the original trilogy was 10x more compelling and emotional than anything in the new trilogy, eventhough it was slow paced and had no video game acrobatics.

    You know, at this point: screw it. There's nothing redeeming left about the Star Wars universe. Have at it Mr. Lucas. I hope you make millions turning the franchise into a DragonBall Z ripoff. Jedis' hair volume and color should correlate to their Jedi rank and powers. That's really all that's left to do.
  • Re:I don't get it (Score:5, Insightful)

    by aztektum ( 170569 ) on Sunday May 27, 2007 @07:48PM (#19295739)
    cuz that would only leave 3 guys with lightsabers and the only thing selling this series anymore is Jedi
  • Re:CG WTF? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by halivar ( 535827 ) <bfelger&gmail,com> on Sunday May 27, 2007 @10:14PM (#19296681)
    George Lucas had nothing to do with the CBS Holiday Special. At least give the man some credit...
  • by BillGatesLoveChild ( 1046184 ) on Monday May 28, 2007 @12:05AM (#19297269) Journal
    George Lucas is one guy who dreamed up and made a few good SciFi movies 30 years ago.

    These days, we've all got ridiculously high-powered PCs, and many people have one or move of 3DSMAX/BLENDER(free)/VUE/POSER/DAZ-STUDIO(free)/CI NEMA4D/LIGHTWAVE/RHINO/MILKSHAPE. There's a lot of old cinematography books scattered all over the Internet too. When they're done, BitTorrent is a damned fast distribution medium.

    These days, anyone can make a science fiction movie. The concept has already been proven by Star Warz Fan Boys who have made their own Star Wars rip offs, on the cheap but with great SFX and decent production quality. Sadly the Fan Boys used Lucas' old material instead of getting an original idea in their head. Lucas' prequels have taught us how *not* to make a movie. Now lets put that to practice.

    Some come on people, get together! We don't need to wait for Lucas to dream up next years line of would-be Christmas presents and cheesy merchandising. Do your own damned movies! Instead of another Star Wars rehash, how about something new? Indy bands can now put out music without signing away to the RIAA cartel. We can do the same.
  • by Quiet_Desperation ( 858215 ) on Monday May 28, 2007 @01:39AM (#19297665)

    He GAVE it to us

    I may have only been 12, but I distinctly recall paying $6 for it.

  • Re:Come on geeks (Score:1, Insightful)

    by that this is not und ( 1026860 ) on Monday May 28, 2007 @07:46AM (#19298869)
    For SF-reading geeks, Star Wars wasn't even cool in 1978. It was like 'neat movie, neat special effects, but it's a space-western.'

    The Star Wars boom actually hurt the Science Fiction market. Badly. There was a lot of cool stuff being written before the market got flooded with all the space-western derivatives.
  • by 19Buck ( 517176 ) on Monday May 28, 2007 @12:55PM (#19300771) Homepage
    Jesus just because something is rendered out of CGI doesn't mean it HAS to be photo realistic quality, or even push the envelope of model complexity.

    It's a Stylistic Design choice, it's got nothing to do with technical capability.

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein

Working...