Puncturing the "PCs Are Cheaper Than Macs" Myth 823
jcatcw writes "The recently converted Scot Finnie went notebook shopping. At the high end of the notebook spectrum, in order to get comparable power and features, a Dell machine comes in $650 over the Apple, and it was clunkier and weighed more. Sony couldn't beat the Apple either. Midrange and low-end machines, though, turn out to be pretty comparable, with more choices in the PC arena but some good values if you happen to want what Apple has decided you need. So, if you're talking name-brand hardware, it's just no longer the case that PCs are cheaper than Macs."
Headline should read (Score:2, Interesting)
Honestly, if you are looking at value, build a desktop. Unfortunately, with a laptop, you are stuck with whatever options you might be able to select, which on a Mac is even less than through sellers like Dell. Why can't I select my own components to go in a laptop?
Re:The Kilff Note's version... (Score:2, Interesting)
Why do I need to spend an extra $2,350 for a PowerBook again?
Re:MacBook is a good value (Score:3, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
My first time dealing with a broken imac (Score:1, Interesting)
Apple told us they were not going to send a tech. from the company, that we needed to contact ourselves a partner in our area and gave us a phone #. I called that company and wanted to have my customer number. I told him we bought the macs using the Apple website. Then he told me in order for them to fix the imac we have to have a customer number, wont give me a RMA, and suggested ME to BRING THE MACHINE TO THE SHOP to look at it.
I went back to Apple which finally gave us our customer number. Called the shop again and they told us you need "our" client number, not Apples, so no chance for an RMA...
This situation pissed me off. Corporate customers do not have time to deal with problems like this. I realized then, Apple is not prepared for business customers, it all looked like a small, home-based, local-shop operation. The entire day wasted learning this didn't make me very happy either.
To summarize: Broken Apple database, inattentive support from two companies, not fast solution to downtime, profit lost.
Right and Wrong? (Score:3, Interesting)
I am also a Final Cut Studio user, so I'm not going to be able to use an El Cheapo PC laptop (I'll have to beef up the HD, the video card, memory, etc. *AND* buy Sony, Adobe, and/or Avid software). That makes buying a PC laptop more expensive--at least as much as a well-equipped Macbook Pro w/ FCS2.
If you're not that picky about the OS or have needs that push the limits, I suppose a $500 laptop from Acer makes you happy. Some people, however, wouldn't or couldn't use that bargain laptop if you gave it to them for free.
Broken Link Alert! (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Not true anymore (Score:3, Interesting)
That being said, does 11"x11"x2" for $519.97 work for you? link [minipc.ca].
Two winning points on the hardware side (Score:4, Interesting)
Of course, Macs have an-ease-of-use that's quite simply, sublime. As an example, every time a family member has visited and wanted access to our wireless network with their PC, it's been a hassle to set up. On the other hand, I took my Mac to my parents or in-laws and hopped on their wireless networks with nary a hitch.
I Read The Article (Score:3, Interesting)
I think most people would agree with me.
His premise is that the mac SKUs are the baseline machines, but the whole cornucopia of customized machines at Dell is some type of niche market. I think you both would be well-served to look up the definition of the word "niche".
In fact, I'd be willing to bet that for all configurations except for the niche Mac models, you'd get a significantly better deal customizing a notebook at dell.com.
If we can, from this, draw the conclusion that "Everybody knows PCs are cheaper than Macs, right? Wrong!", then I am Cindy Lauper.
In fact, the only conclusion that we can draw from this guy's analysis is that Dell does not offer a direct feature-by-feature competitor to the MacBook Pro 17. Perhaps Lenovo, HP, Toshiba, Compaq, etc. offer one? I don't know or care enough to look, but what I do know is that with all of those options and all that competition out there, you are bound to get a better deal on a Windows notebook than a MacBook the overwhelming majority of the time.
Re:Imagine... (Score:3, Interesting)
I agree with this, however I've found that the quality of the applications and consistency of user interfaces is far superior to Windows.
I'd say that Macs and PCs have a similar number of *good* applications.
And I've yet to find a text editor on any platform that can compare to TextMate.
Re:To the average person (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Yeah... (Score:5, Interesting)
Of course they are. I spent a lot of time comparing the two when I recently replaced my music/video workstation. There's just no comparison. It would have cost me very nearly twice as much to go with Apple for the very same hardware, even if Apple had a configuration that fit my needs. And that's before even beginning to buy software. I use an expensive professional PCI audio interface that fits my needs precisely, so the Mac Pro was the only Apple product I could have chosen.
I would very much have liked to be using Logic Pro on a Mac Pro. It's what I learned on, and I enjoy the Mac interface, but not enough to go the extra price. But I'm running Sonar on a PC that has almost exactly the same specs as the Mac Pro and I came in at more than $1400 below the Apple system. Oh, and I also like using the DXi plugins, so that limited me to Windows. I could have found VST or RTAS equivalents, but I have a large investment in DXi gizmos.
I got 2 bucks worth of hope in the form of a couple of Lotto tickets sitting in my wallet. If I hit the number, I promise I'll switch to the Mac Pro, Logic Pro setup right away. But I'll keep the PC to run some virtual instruments and connect them via optical SPDIF. It might suprise the serious Mac fans, but I am able to be productive (and creative) on my PC.
Re:Dell != PC (Score:3, Interesting)
I have the machine because I was given it for work and because I have a *N*X project which has scripts in it that are not BSD friendly. The battery lasts about a couple of hours. Tomorrow I fly from the UK to La La Land on one of my regular jaunts there. The works Dell is being wrapped in clothing and put in my case and going through the hold. My 2 year old iBook is going in my hand luggage because the battery lasts long enough for what I need over the 18 hour trip, it's small, it's light and I can run everything I need on it (except that build).
Towards the end of the year I will upgrade to a Mac Book Pro and run both XP and Linux in VMs. 95% of work will be done in OS-X.
Sorry but when Linux is consumer friendly I'll use it full time but that's not the case now and I cost far too much to spend development and consultancy time googling for fixes, patching kernels and recompiling on my development machine.
Bollocks! (Score:3, Interesting)
CHIP: 2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
RAM: 1 gig, DDR2 533mhz
DRIVE: 80 gig
VIDEO: Integrated Intel with 64 megs (not a typo!) shared memory.
DELL INSPIRON 1501: $799 (from Dell's site [dell.com]
CHIP: Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 2GHz
RAM: 1 gig DDR2 533mhz
DRIVE: 120 gigs
VIDEO: ATI Radeon Xpress1150 256 megs dedicated memory
So where does Apple win? Dell just gave me a technically superior machine -- 64 bit processor, larger hard drive, insanely better video card. The Dell also comes with Vista Home, if you're wondering -- I didn't cheat and go for some freeDOS or anything. For three hundred less.
Oh, the Macbook is smaller. Whooptee do. That doesn't matter at all to me; it's purely subjective if it matters to you, but is it really worth 300 more dollars and a crappier machine?
This was just the first random Dell I saw, so don't give me wah-wah-wah Dell sucks or Inspiron sucks. When I was shopping for a laptop I actually did consider a Macbook until I saw how much more I could get from other manufacturers for less money -- Toshiba and HP had similar prices for similar machines. (I ended up with an HP.) IBM's Thinkpad came very close, but the specs were close enough that you could call it a borderline case and the Thinkpad came out like a hundred dollars more.
Re:Dell != PC (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Maybe Apple should consider licensing OS/X agai (Score:1, Interesting)
Obviously you are not a Mac user. Computers are much more than a piece of hardware with some software grafted on or in. They are a synergistic system. Apple is the ONLY personal computer maker who builds both as an integrated system "that just works". Why should they give up that exclusive advantage? Just to compete with MS for something nebulous called 'marketshare'?
By what logic do you suppose that allowing clones would help their high end hardware business? They have nothing to gain and lots to lose by trying to compete in the cutthroat PC business.
Re:To the average person (Score:4, Interesting)
Priced maybe, but feature wise it's not even close. http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product
If we upgrade the mini to match the stats of that HP (gig of ram, 250 gig harddrive, dvd burner) well, we can't even match them, but we get close.. we're still stuck with a worse video card and only 180 gig harddrive.. but it still costs twice as much! $1074 for the closely equipped mini, compared to $549 for the HP.
Maybe you think the athlon64 x2 isn't as good as a core 2 duo.. that's ok, upgrading the PC to a core 2 duo makes it $669. Still cheaper, and the harddrive is even bigger.
Apple doesn't compete in the sub-$1000 range.. the mini is underpowered compared to PCs in the same price range.
Re:Maybe Apple should consider licensing OS/X agai (Score:4, Interesting)
I guess I'm assuming that most of Apple's current mac customer base would stick with Apple hardware, either because they can already afford it, or because they're 'cult of Apple' types that would pay extra even if they didn't have to. Maybe that's a false assumption. But if it's not, then low-end clones would mean Apple's computers would be running a 'more mainstream' OS, and would have more available applications. That's got to be good for Apple. Whether it's better they their current monopoly control of a non-mainstream system with limited application availability is an interesting question. I just wonder whether they're asking it of themselves these days.
Re:Macs are PCs! (Score:4, Interesting)
It's not that Macs cost more initially, the question is "why is the same hardware worth less when it's pre-loaded with Windows?"
...a little humor there if you didn't spot it...
Anyway, long term, Macs win hands down in price/maintenance/resale. Yes, we resell Macs after 4-6 years. Most of the PCs are in the dumpster by then.
Re:Yeah... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:To the average person (Score:3, Interesting)
If you plug an AGP 8X card into and older mac it won't even POWER ON. Why? Because Apple decided to take a few "reserved for future use" pins noted in the AGP spec and do something else with them.