Congress Considering More Low Power FM Stations 133
Skapare writes "According to this ReclaimTheMedia article, the Local Community Radio Act of 2007 (PDF) would remove the artificial restrictions imposed on LPFM by a 2000 law passed at the urging of corporate radio giants and NPR, claiming that small community stations would interfere with the signals of larger stations. If passed, this bill will pave the way for educational groups, nonprofits, unions, schools and local governments to launch new local radio stations across the country."
Radio? (Score:2)
Re:Radio? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Radio? (Score:4, Funny)
Then it must be regulated! Can't let the public get out of hand. Better that they spend their money on items to express their personality than to express their discontent in a society that abuses them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
This law is essential to undo the injustice of the 2000 law.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Sometimes, you just want to turn on a station. Maybe you'll get talk. Maybe you'll get some new music, a local band putting out something. Maybe you'll even get a radio drama (I just finished producing one this semester).
But the idea is that, with radio, you and possibly a number of others near you are listening to the same thing. And that sense of commun
Re: (Score:2)
If you get a non-profit running a LPFM station....again, making NO money off it, can you play any song you want without having to pay performance fees and what have you? I'm curious, if you're broadcasting for no profit, can you broadcast stuff for free?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I listen to it too, but it's heavily biased. Might as well be named National Corporate Radio!
Yes, it would be damned annoying.
Re:Radio? (Score:5, Insightful)
Ramsey Electronics will sell you a 50 watt LPFM Radio Station In A Box [ramseyelectronics.com] for $4000.
The price of a single high-end laptop. The non-profit may want to reach the audience that doesn't have dial-up service, much less WiFi or broadband cable: the poor, the elderly, the disabled, etc.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The Ramsey unit is quite literally a commercial grade - FCC certified - station in a box.
50 Watt Output. CD-Recorder. Tascom CD-Dual Cassette Deck. Audio mixers. Studio microphone. Antenna. 100 Watt Stereo Amp for local PA. The whole nine yards. Shock-mounted. Dump it in the back of a truck. Set up anywhere.
The Tascom deck alone lists at $950.
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.freeradio.org/documents/index.html?view as=list& [freeradio.org]
http://www.freeradio.org/tech/images/primer.pdf [freeradio.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Radio? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
The transmitter by itself is $2000 (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, guess what? (Score:4, Insightful)
That's why FM radio is still a good option. And the transmitter for low power is pretty cheap, and no need to pay for expensive bandwith or whatnot, and as many people as there are locally who can tune it all get the same stream of talk or whatever, infinitely scalable, 100 to a million, as long as you are in range, you get the same thing everyone else can get.
Enough reasons?
Re: (Score:2)
Also, Soundscan collects extra fees for any internet radio station that plays music, and is about to retroactively raise the rates, so internet radio stations with music aren't cheaper than true radio stations in the long run.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
RADIO WINS
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Fallback (Score:3, Insightful)
I would also suggest that the radio is FAR more effective than the internet for reaching a geographically concentrated t
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
A few reasons:
Re: (Score:2)
Your comments would suggest that perhaps you are out of touch with reality just a little. Let me fill in some of the blanks for you.
Your world revolves around technology, as does mine. We are Slashdotters; it is how our world works.
Our world is not the same as the world for everyone.
Let me point out the simple fact that you can sometimes pick up an FM radio at a dollar store, and it works. Maybe it does
Re: (Score:2)
Things change and, whilst the Internet provides a plethora of information and news, at the end of the day, people are busy. They commute to and from work and many of them will simply tune into the radio. Workplaces everywhere have the radio on. Radio is hands-free, eyes-free.
The Internet doesn't have a captive audience, but in many respects, radio still does.
Re: (Score:2)
one example (Score:3, Informative)
yet.
Without reading the article I can conclusively state I'm behind every effort to expand private and low-power penetration of the airwaves.
Like the last translator invasion? (Score:4, Insightful)
No reason why that has to be. (Score:3, Interesting)
I think it could be a boon for colleges and small organizations that might be interested in having a radio station, but that can't afford one currently because it's so expensive to get spectrum.
Re: (Score:2)
Great... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Eh, it's not like it worked well anyway. Might as well listen to small radio stations instead of being isolated within your own personal preferences.
Re: (Score:2)
Good illustration of your point, however the value of a large mass communicating over public airwaves is more important in my mind than a person's use of those same public airwaves for their own individual use. This is certainly open to interpretation and discussion.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I use an FM transmitter for a CD player in my car because I'm too cheap to buy a new stereo. Anyone who happens to be within its range, which is maybe 20 feet, is perfectly welcome to have a listen.
I would like to see a little bit reserved for such non-licensed radios. I've gone through the presets on my transmitter, and the only interference-free setting in this town is 87.7MHz. When I travel, that changes. I know the only real way to get spectrum is to shell out, but it would be nice t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-PA0p6u2g1Jg/cgi-bin/P rodView.asp?g=771&I=142FMMOD01 [crutchfield.com]
This bad boy connects to your antenna connection behind the dash, and as soon as you power it up to use it, it "disconnects" the aerial antenna, eliminating that interference.
I am buying one because I have exactly TWO usable freqencies in my area that I can use... one for the east side of town where I work, and the other on the south side where I live... And both of tho
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Love mine (Score:4, Interesting)
Fuck Clear Channel.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, what the hell, Fsck Clear Channel !
Actually, I have a friend at Clear Channel, though he may not be after this.
Here in Houston we have KPFT [kpft.org] Pacific Radio and KUHF [kuhf.org] NPR.
Radio Libre! (Score:5, Funny)
They had a stand off with the authorities for a month before the cops finally got a court order and raided the house. Funny story, they had this weird guy who lived in the attic and saved all his pee in jars, so they booby trapped the place with jars of pee. Those were not happy cops that day, I'll tell you what. But the spirit of the place was broken, and Santa Cruz lost its pirate radio.
In San Francisco, the station I knew had an actual studio in the Labor Temple [noehill.com] right next to my IWW union office, and no one bothered them much. Heh, if you lived within five blocks of Mission and 16th, you might even have heard them. Woot! 30 whole watts of AWESOME POWER! Ah, good times, good times.
Re: (Score:2)
That's awesome. Glad to hear it.
Down in Santa Cruz they had this micro-power radio station set up in the local anarchist house, which was also the main Food not Bombs house.
It seems anarchist houses are where many of the current pirate stations are run out of. All the more reason to donate money to them.
The FCC found out about it and came to try to bust them, but somehow they got word and skedaddled. No lie, they loaded up the station
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's great to hear! We need to do a better job of coordinating and communicating because I'm sure many of us would love
Re:Radio Libre! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
There are several I know of, and they work quite well. They let homeless people sleep there, have a library, racks of free clothes for people who need them. Give people a place out of the elements.
There are some problems, like theft from drifters, but the value outweighs the issues in my mind.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Um, by definition if you eschew the concept of property, then there cannot be "theft."
Reminds me of a student anarchist I met at one campus or another who explained earnestly that they hoped to dismantle the government and replace it with a better one.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
An anarchist does not want a government to exist, a communist does not want property to exist (as a concept). So in anarchism there can very well be theft there would simply be large group that defines what it is or tries to stop it. So in anarchism someone can very well claim that X is theirs but it simply falls on them to defend their own claim.
Re: (Score:1)
Excellent response that was well put.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
ahh bullshit, what you are discribing is exactly what our government does with police and military, only not on your small minded scale.
Re: (Score:2)
Or in other words right now you get no choice in what military or police protection you get (unless you move) while in anarchism you get a c
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I know, we could call them governments.
Re: (Score:2)
"there would simply not be a large group that defines what it is or tries to stop it."
In other words there is no government, you define theft however you want but it also falls on you to enforce your own definition. As I understand one way to think about it is if everything the government did (police, military, firefighting, printing money, legal system, etc.) was done by "private" companies/groups (of which there may be 0 or they may have a size of 1).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Awww, come on. Don't enable them to steal our word! At least label us lefty-anarchists as Classical Libertarianism!
It's not a lost cause, it's only in America that they've managed to steal it. We can take it back!
Re: (Score:2)
Originally, what I would call classical Liberalism embraced property rights for the common man. It was a defense against the power of kings and nobles. This was way back, before Anarchism even existed as such. Even looking at the
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree with you, however even if it was impeccably explained their basic system of where values lie make them incompatible with anarchism as we know it. Overcoming those selfish desires, and focusing on where power lies within t
Re: (Score:2)
I love you guys, but come on. Anarchist, anarcho-capitalist, libertarian, crypto-eco-anarcho-socialist... who cares? Are they fighting for the power or against it? Your politics are boring as fuck [crimethinc.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Anyway, the main point I wanted to get across is tha
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The funniest thing was the toilet, though, because the house had sunk about a foot. The pipes hadn't. The toilet stood up on its pipes, rocking precariously when you sat down. The scariest thing was when the gas line broke. That was really what set the whole chain of events off. The owners of the house were actually a married couple of ex-cops, so they had managed to ge
All I have to say about this is... (Score:1)
Gee, thanks, guys! (Score:1)
I'm sure all of the folks can't wait to broadcast their podcasts across ye olde aether.
Thanks for the effort Congress! I'm sorry that I said that you were spineless, useless sacks of emu shit.
No More Pirate Radio (Score:1, Insightful)
LPFM does interfere (Score:2, Informative)
However WPHS interferes with "large" FM 88.7 CIMX broadcasts in an ~ 2 mile radius from the location of WPHS. When tuned to 88.7 FM CIMX , the static and interference from WPHS makes it impossible to listen to CIMX in the area. The inference is not isolated to 88.7 FM but extends to adjacent channels 88.5 - 89.9 FM and can be clearly heard in this entire spectr
Re: (Score:2)
Re:LPFM does interfere (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
fox news reports (Score:5, Insightful)
Before trying to create the truth by repeating a lie, get the facts. In my market, on the fm dial, we have 3 general college radio stations. We have one left radio station, and two other college stations that are leftish. We have 3 christian radio stations. The other 20+ stations are commercial, I believe mostly owned by two or three enitites. At times over the past couple years, one could find 2 pairs of stations playing the same content. I do not think these stats are atypical.
The overcrowding of the FM dial is real. There are times when, at least on an analog tuner, it is difficult to distinguish a single station. NPR is not, with it's single station, or at most two, in each market, crowding the dial. What is crowding the dial is the relaxation of the ownership rules. While the summery touched on this with putting corporate radio first, the summary also implied that the problem will be solved by simplying allowing the airwaves to become more crowded.
This will not solve the problem. And while Fox news is not going to state the obvious solution, I will. Limit ownership of bandwidth to one station per entity. If the FCC wants to a vibrant radio dial, review the rules [fcc.gov] set 10 years ago. There is not reason why a single entity should ever own more that a couple stations in any market. Period. If that means the commercials stations drop precipitately, so be it. There are evidently operators out there biting at the bit, angry that they cannot get a place to play. Ownership rules will open up that space.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
On the other hand, shit man, people go on
Re: (Score:2)
That's only with an omnidirectional antenna. With a yagi and a good radio, you can distinguish multiple stations on the same frequency.
HD radio signals are causing no end of good for FM DXers, but multicasting (actually multiplexed broadcasting) means multiple audio streams can broadcast on the same frequency.
Re: (Score:1)
Freedom is not why this bill is being pushed (Score:3, Insightful)
Still, pay close attention to how this bill is being written and who can actually get these stations and who can't. Democrats are going to push to make sure that their people get the stations, and Republicans need to be on their toes to make sure their people get theres. If you see things like city governments, universities, and public schools getting more stations (all traditionally liberal points), then the Democrats are playing games. If you see things like churches, local chambers of commerce, adult groups like the FreeMasons, or even gun clubs getting them, then you can bet that Republicans win.
If they compromise and everyone can get a station, then it is a good bill.
Re: (Score:2)
An "explosion" of FM stations will not affect the AM dial, which is the home of the majority of right-wing talk radio... it would hardly make a dent.
The biggest proponents of this bill ARE churches... religious groups have been pushing for this ability for a long time. They want to have a bully pulpit that extends beyond the four walls of their church.
The application process is pretty much open to any and all comers... stations are not allocated by political bent... it's
more talk radio - where's Hillary? (Score:1)
more stations. Another Right Wing Conspiracy!
Superheterodyne, my ass!
Low-power station disrupts NPR for me (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks,
Mike
Re: (Score:2)
If they were licensed, they probably would not be on your local NPR station's frequency. That's the rationale for licensing.
One problem. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You are likely thinking of television broadcasting. The FCC has slated February 17, 2009, though considering that the deadline had been pushed back several times previously, it would not surprise me if this gets pushed out again.
In band on channel (IBOC) digital radio broadcasting is already emerging in the larger markets. Basically, you can get a digital receiver and listen to your favorite radio station play all its programming, commercials and all, in CD quality audio. The only cost is the receiver.
Re: (Score:2)
That's TV, and it probably won't happen on schedule (in about 20 months)
Given the bandwidth requirements of digital sound and the fact that FM can deliver pretty decent audio in its primary service area, it's not easy to see why -- other than marketing -- one would want to replace it with a digital service. There are some experiments in progress with sending digital subchannels on subcarriers of FM stations, but I'm not sure that mak
Re: (Score:2)
No.
But it might be a good idea. Unlike TV, which in both analog and digital is confined to a specific slice of spectrum (6 MHz wide in North America), FM actually occupies much more spectrum than the 200 kHz channel spacing. And this spectrum usage is uneven. Most of the signal is near the center, but the sidebands, some as far out as +/- 800 kHz, do carry some information at a lower power. The end result is that squeezing FM signals together is trickier. It's all a matter of degree, too ... the close
Congress Considering More Low Power FM Stations (Score:1)
I hope they finally pass this (Score:1)
Well, that's what they always say (Score:4, Insightful)
Who complains when it is the other way around? I remember when the campus station came on the air at Macalester College in St. Paul, MN and I could pick it up from a few miles away if I clicked "mono". Easy to remember because seven days later our MONSTER ROCKIN' HITS! 800-lb gorilla of a station activated their gazillion watt antenna on top of a 50 story building and the overloading in my receiver splattered harmonics across the band. No more Macalester for me so I'm inclined to suspect the big players just don't want to be bothered with being good neighbors on the airwaves.
I hope this doesn't derail the OTHER 'radio' bill. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The public cultural and political discourse in this country is broken. Radio is about the worst. Any place you go in the country, the radio dial is choked with identical formtas, content and viewpoints. It wouldn't hurt those viewpoints if they were restricted to two or three stations per market.
I believe that non-local corporations should be limited to one third of the spectrum, one third for local entrepreneurs,