RIAA, Safenet Sued For Malicious Prosecution 337
DaveAtFraud writes "Tanya Anderson, the single mother from Oregon previously sued by the RIAA — which dropped the case just before losing a summary judgement — is now suing the RIAA and their hired snoop Safenet for malicious prosecution. (Safenet was formerly known as MediaSentry.) Anderson is asserting claims under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act. A reader at Groklaw has already picked up that she is seeking to have the RIAA forfeit the copyrights in question as part of the settlement (search the page for '18.6-7')."
Re:Give up the copyrights? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:The RIAA don't have copyrights.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Give up the copyrights? (Score:5, Funny)
Oh, sorry. I thought you said Crypto-Fascist. My mistake.
Re:Give up the copyrights? (Score:5, Funny)
Even more importantly, do you know how to RTFA?
Re:Give up the copyrights? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Give up the copyrights? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Give up the copyrights? (Score:4, Funny)
Gaah, my eyes!! (Score:2, Funny)
This thread really needs a car analogy (Score:1, Funny)
Re:How to avoid a jury trial/force a settlement? (Score:5, Funny)
Mmmmm, jurylicious.
Dia-RIAA (Score:2, Funny)
Re:How to avoid a jury trial/force a settlement? (Score:2, Funny)
I was under the impression that most spherical, homo-sapien anatomy, did indeed, come in pairs. Two, not twelve. Unless you're jiggling down multiple sets into a single lump sum, which is interesting because I was also under the impression that when referring to one's "pears" most people only have a single set, and the type of "pears" we're referring to, and their respective locations differ between the male and female anatomies. I think maybe however my take on your writing style is bulging out of proportion.
This thread, is officially a lemon.
Re:Hope she has money (Score:4, Funny)
I hope you don't bill $250/hour for your arithmetic time.
Re:Give up the copyrights? (Score:4, Funny)
Is that the time when
Fucking sweet!
We are finally free from the tyrannical rule of the mods! All rejoice!
Re:Give up the copyrights? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Give up the copyrights? (Score:2, Funny)
Damn! Is my Freudian slip showing again? *sigh*
Re:Give up the copyrights? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Give up the copyrights? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Give up the copyrights? (Score:2, Funny)
Stop! Thief!
She is snot guilty! (Score:2, Funny)
OT - Re:Gaah, my eyes!! (Score:3, Funny)
True story:
In the early days of OCR, one of our attorneys wanted to see if he could scan a ton of his old hard copy docs into the computer and said he'd heard how wonderful scanners were. In spite of my repeated explanations of how immature the tech was (think 1.0), he insisted, so I had him send down a couple of docs for a test.
Needless to say, the resulting OCR scan was a ridiculous mess. The "old fashioned" font used for "United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia" came out as:
But the funniest side effect was seeing "witness for the prosecution" converted to "witness to the prostitution".