Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Media Science

Microholography Could Lead to 500 GB Discs 158

angrykeyboarder writes "Scientists have discovered a way to fit 500 GB of data onto DVD-sized discs. These discs would be created with a process called 'microholography, which combines multilayer storage of data with holographic imagery. From the article: 'Microholography allows data to be stored in three dimensions. The technology works by replacing the two-dimensional pit-land structures currently found on CDs and DVDs with microgratings, which are holographically induced using two laser beams. In other words, instead of recording to a series of bumps and pits like standard CDs, the new technology creates three-dimensional holographic grids that can be used for reading and writing data throughout the physical structure of the disc.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microholography Could Lead to 500 GB Discs

Comments Filter:
  • Re:I miss minidisc (Score:5, Informative)

    by Tim Browse ( 9263 ) on Sunday July 08, 2007 @06:37AM (#19787837)

    They have a pension for failing but you'd be pretty dumb to use it as you're only backup medium.

    Penchant.

    (I'm willing to let the apostrophe error slide.)

    </pedant>

  • by sien ( 35268 ) on Sunday July 08, 2007 @07:00AM (#19787919) Homepage
    InPhase Technologies [inphase-tech.com] have a system that writes 300GB holographic discs and they have a roadmap that goes to 1.6TB.

    They cost [inphase-tech.com] 18K for the drive and $300 for the discs.

    They are expensive now, but when they drop they will make it worthwhile.

    All of the Simpsons, the Complete Bach, the complete Mozart, the complete Beethoven all together on one disc.

  • by Harald Paulsen ( 621759 ) * on Sunday July 08, 2007 @08:13AM (#19788355) Homepage
    I had a MDH-10, an external scsi-device using 140MB per disc. For more information, see http://www.minidisc.org/md_data_table.html [minidisc.org] They even had digital cameras use discs! Unfortunately, sony has a bad track record in coming up with their own formats and formfactors.
  • Re:I miss minidisc (Score:5, Informative)

    by TheRaven64 ( 641858 ) on Sunday July 08, 2007 @08:22AM (#19788391) Journal
    I couldn't agree more. The original MD-Data at 140MB per disk was bigger than my laptop drive at the time (60MB). The later revisions, at 650MB and 1GB, are still a nice form factor. If Sony had gone the CD-ROM route of charging a small royalty on each disk and drive, and letting other people manufacture both, then I doubt I'd be using CDs for music today. Three things really killed the format:
    • The drives were expensive, and were never included in laptop (where they would have been ideal for backup and data transfer).
    • They charged a premium for 'data' disks, even though the music disks also stored digital data, and were identical in every way except for a flag allowing the MD-Data drive to use them.
    • They didn't allow the drive to read or write music. CD-ROM drives could play your music through your PC speakers, MD-Data drives couldn't.
    The number of Sony products that have failed due to bad management make me wonder if anyone actually owns Sony shares. If I'd owned any in the '80s or '90s I'd have been calling loudly for the board to replace the management.
  • Re:Not again. (Score:4, Informative)

    by Jeff DeMaagd ( 2015 ) on Sunday July 08, 2007 @10:16AM (#19789103) Homepage Journal
    "Seriously, ICs are is no more than a smaller transistor. We've got the same technology for over 60 years and they're still trying to "improve" it?"

    Anyways, then don't buy the product. There are notebooks that do not include a built-in optical drive. If you truly believed in a non-motor computer, you can probably get a SSD -based Toshiba ultraportable right now. The problem is that with demanding no motors, you can't expect a fast CPU or graphics processor because that would require a fan to cool them, which is another motor. So that leaves you with a 1.3GHz notebook with 32GB of "hard drive", for over $2000. At least it would look pretty cool and be very light. I think there are Panasonics without motors too.

    Research-wise, it's probably not your money to spend. No one can predict what technology will prevail, and the good idea is for different groups to invest in what they are good at, and the market decides what is most desirable for what task. The optical drive will still be mainstream for a while yet, and after that, possibly remain a viable niche for much longer.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 08, 2007 @02:28PM (#19791147)
    Uh, this idea belongs to the filesystem layer more than to the hardware layer. Theoretically it's something you can already do with any disc. All you need is software support.

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...