Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies Media Technology Your Rights Online

Paramount to Drop Blu-Ray for HD-DVD 476

JM78 writes to tell us The New York Times is reporting that Paramount Pictures and DreamWorks Animation will be dropping support for Blu-ray Disc and going solely with HD-DVD for their next gen DVDs. "Jeffrey Katzenberg, CEO of DreamWorks Animation, said consumers seeking to switch to high-definition DVDs will be enticed by the movies available for HD-DVD players. He added the lower price for the Toshiba devices will appeal to the family market. 'It's a game-changer, what they're doing, and it's why we decided to throw in with them,' Katzenberg said."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Paramount to Drop Blu-Ray for HD-DVD

Comments Filter:
  • What's the Motive? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Rorzabal ( 1138403 ) on Monday August 20, 2007 @08:51PM (#20299067)
    I have to ask myself, what's the motive a studio would have with going toward HD DVD technology vs. Blu-Ray?
    It seems to me that they are trying to steer towards a format that contains half the data storage capacity with the goal of having yet another format go obsolete sooner rather than later. They must make a ton of money when people re-purchase titles on a new format. Soon these same studios will be 'crying' because they don't have enough data space on a disc, therefore they have to push a new standard.
  • by FreeKill ( 1020271 ) on Monday August 20, 2007 @08:55PM (#20299083) Homepage
    I know I don't. It really doesn't matter if Blu-Ray or HD-DVD wins out in the end, there can't be that many consumers out there who are planning to start upgrading their existing DVD collection to one of these formats. I have an HDTV and regular DVD's look just fine. I know these new formats offer better quality, but the difference and enhancements are not enough to warrant an upgrade. From VHS to DVD was worthwhile, this is just a stop gap measure. I personally don't plan to upgrade at all until something significantly better comes along. Maybe the next generation after this...
  • by Spudtrooper ( 1073512 ) on Monday August 20, 2007 @08:55PM (#20299095)

    I have to ask myself, what's the motive a studio would have with going toward HD DVD technology vs. Blu-Ray?


    Actually, there's a decent examination of the possible reasons for the choice over at Fat Harry's Bullshit Emporium and Discount Taxidermist [aintitcool.com].
  • Re:Yeah, right. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by taskiss ( 94652 ) on Monday August 20, 2007 @08:56PM (#20299103)
    I don't have a horse in this race. I just want the reader/writer to come down in price already!
  • by SyncNine ( 532248 ) on Monday August 20, 2007 @08:57PM (#20299121)
    I don't think this was the best time for Paramount to jump ship on the Blu-ray line. While they _may_ have looked at the numbers involved, units sold, etc., all of that data was over the last year or so. What they didn't really consider was that a lot of non-videophile (aka., people who would buy a specific HD-DVD / Blu-ray player) purchasers were going to start purchasing PS3s...

    With Sony's recent price drop, the sales of their console have increased. As far as consoles go, this isn't a tremendous jump -- they're still trailing behind Microsoft and Nintendo as far as sales. As far as HD-Movie players go, however, this is quite a jump. According to 'figures' and sources [kotaku.com]., they are seeing up to a 135% increase in sales after their price drop. That's a lot of Blu-ray players on the market that weren't there a short time ago.

    Personally, I'm pissed! I purchased a PS3 during the price drop and I'm ok with what Sony has to offer for the console and with what movies are presently out (though, admittedly, I'd like more on both fronts), but you'll notice I said 'ok', I didn't say I was a raving Sony fanboy. I think there could be more selection of movies and games -- and it saddens me that I will now not be able to own a 1080p copy of Transformers to watch on my 51" HDTV because some pockets were apparently lined. [deadlineho...ddaily.com]

    I understand that I'm not the norm in the market -- a lot of people don't have HDTVs, and a lot of people that do don't have big-screened HDTVs, but even with that, I think that it's a big step backwards for Paramount to alienate my class of shopper.

    Then again, I'm sure everyone who was alienated by the Betamax -> VHS move was saying the same thing then ...
  • by hansamurai ( 907719 ) <hansamurai@gmail.com> on Monday August 20, 2007 @09:07PM (#20299181) Homepage Journal
    I just want a Blu-Ray writer for my computer, backing up 25GBs of data on a single layer disc would make it worth it for me.
  • by Fallen Kell ( 165468 ) on Monday August 20, 2007 @09:10PM (#20299205)
    Not when Spielberg made certain that his movies were still released on BluRay. It says something when the premier director of the last 20-30 years says that he won't let politics like this keep his movies from being on both formats. I also love their "research" that "people who own gaming consoles buy fewer movies than those who invest in a movie-only player", when I personally already own 19 BluRay discs and I only own a PS3. This is how they are trying to discredit the install base everyone. The PS3 is the BEST BluRay player on the market. Why would anyone buy a different player? This has been shown in many different reviews from top A/V sites. The people buying BluRay players are all buying the PS3, so their "research" is a load of crap based on a totally flawed study using data from older DVD era. The fact is, when the best unit isn't just a stand-alone player but a game console, you have to look at what the best player was when your DVD era data was collected. I can tell you that the best player then certainly wasn't the PS2, and was a standalone unit (Sony, Denon, Pioneer, etc., etc.,) not an integrated console. Now the console has more processing power then any standalone can compete with, as well as excellent digital connectivity. The other players are not even in its league (which is also why it will be getting the upgrade to the newer BluRay standard just finialized because it has the processing overhead to be able to handle it and is a software based player which allows full upgrades of functionality unlike the other hardware based players which will not be able to get this big of a change to their programming because they do not have hardware that can support the functions).
  • by goatpunch ( 668594 ) on Monday August 20, 2007 @09:23PM (#20299309)
    This time around the competing media are the same physical size, and even use the same codecs. In a few years time all players will be dual-format HD-DVD & Blu-Ray, and you'll need the red and blue boxes to tell them apart on your shelf.

    CDs actually had quite a bit of competition from cassette tapes early on. The quality of pre-recorded tapes improved as did the decks, and other than a bit of background hiss they could hold their own against CDs which were about double the price.

    The first audio CDs (US$30) and players (US$900) were released in 1982, and Audio CD didn't become the leading music format until the early 90's. Many cars had cassette players as standard until the late 90's.
  • Hey I didn't say it wasn't noticeable.. it's just not striking like 1080p. My PS3 does an excellent job of upscaling.

    On another note... Holy cow. I just looked at 1080p projectors. I am NOT buying another TV. The Optoma HD80 1080p projector with a ceiling mount (I'd run the cables professional-quality myself) is my new goal. Run one HDMI cable, use a fully HDMI24 compliant HDMI switch for four sources, and you have yourself a hell of a system that 3 years ago would've cost $30,000 but today is under $3,000. This sounds like my next project.
  • by vanyel ( 28049 ) * on Monday August 20, 2007 @09:47PM (#20299493) Journal
    Just reiterates my resolve that I'll buy a player when there's a decent dual-format player.
  • by Proudrooster ( 580120 ) on Monday August 20, 2007 @09:49PM (#20299505) Homepage
    I am backing whoever defeats DRM so I can connect an HDMI cable to my MythTV box and record.watch Hi-Def content. Until that happens I will record analog only and get the High-Def content through other channels.
  • Weaker DRM in HD-DVD (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Nom du Keyboard ( 633989 ) on Monday August 20, 2007 @10:05PM (#20299653)
    HD-DVD has a weaker DRM system since it doesn't have the BD+ capabilities of BluRay. Hey, that's a plus for the (worse) standard.

    As for the rumor posited above in another post that Microsoft paid a combined $150M to these two studios to induce a switch, the answer is obvious. Microsoft sells an HD-DVD player add-on for XBox 360, and likely hopes to see game titles released in the future utilizing it. It has totally thrown in with the (worse) HD-DVD system, and can't change horses now since Sony owns BluRay. Microsoft has a huge stake in seeing HD-DVD win.

  • by glitch23 ( 557124 ) on Monday August 20, 2007 @10:20PM (#20299787)

    From VHS to DVD was worthwhile, this is just a stop gap measure. I personally don't plan to upgrade at all until something significantly better comes along. Maybe the next generation after this...

    I feel the same way, but then I wonder what could really be included as reasons for buying the next generation, just increased resolution and audio fidelity? Besides adding more special features to the content, what else could there be? I'm seriously asking for ideas because I'm not coming up with anything other than what I just mentioned.

  • Re:Yeah, right. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by ResidntGeek ( 772730 ) on Monday August 20, 2007 @10:33PM (#20299887) Journal

    I'll be surprised if any studio will actually fill up an entire blu-ray dvd to make HD-DVD look that much more inferior of a format
    I can think of one release right off the bat that could fill up an entire Blu-Ray disc - the Closing of the Winterland, by the Grateful Dead. Currently crammed onto 2 DVDs, it's 6 and a quarter hours of music performance - that's more than enough to fill up a 50 GB dual-layer disc.
  • by WebHostingGuy ( 825421 ) * on Monday August 20, 2007 @10:46PM (#20299993) Homepage Journal
    Your missing a few facts:

    You are talking about consoles and watching movies, however, the battle will not be won there but with stand alones. Right now you can get a HD-DVD stand alone for $299 at Best Buy. The corresponding Blu-Ray player goes for $599 (double the cost). In just two months it will be Christmas season and guess what people will be buying? That's right the cheaper one. The $299 cost is the price point at which consumers jump on these things. That's why there has been a huge increase in sales. Blu-Ray may be ahead right now, but they will price themselves out of the market. The selling point for the HD-DVD will be something like this?

    Why pay $600 when you buy ours for $300 and buy 15 movies to go with it for the same cost of just buying the other?

    What's that? Your favorite movie isn't on this format yet? Wait to next year, they release it then.

    And, btw Bourne Ultimatum is one of the movies which will be on HD-DVD, not Blu-Ray.
  • Re:Yeah, right. (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 21, 2007 @12:37AM (#20300817)
    I didn't smell it but read about it in the LA Weekly [deadlineho...ddaily.com].

    Microsoft is warmongering its ways thru the digital media download market, by keeping the war going, the consumer confuse and wary of jumping in the HDM bandwagon.

    "We believe there's room for both formats", yeah, the consumer is thrilled to buy two players to be able to watch any movie...
  • by JM78 ( 1042206 ) on Tuesday August 21, 2007 @01:33AM (#20301127) Journal
    Obvious? I don't buy that argument.

    FTA: "Blu-ray discs can hold more data -- 50 gigabytes compared with HD DVDs 30 GB -- but the technology requires new manufacturing techniques and factories, boosting initial costs. HD DVDs, on the other hand, are essentially DVDs on steroids, meaning movie studios can turn to existing assembly lines to produce them in mass."

    I'm not an expert on the technical aspects of either format, but if this is correct, there is huge incentive for companies to go HD DVD already. Especially so if the movie industry follows the example of the music industry and makes moves to do away with DRM. There isn't much outside of a few GB more space at the cost of much higher manufacturing at that point and there is really no need to go Blu-ray. The format will die. Comparing this to DVD+/-R simply isn't anywhere near the same at all IMHO.
  • by Billly Gates ( 198444 ) on Tuesday August 21, 2007 @02:48AM (#20301509) Journal
    That is probably why they are being dropped and they played along wiht Sony so far because they did not want to miss out in case it became standard.

    This is how Sony lost to VHS. All the vcr makers viewed them as competitors so they supported VHS. Same with IBM and OS/2 vs WIndows. IBM is a mean monopoly so support the underdog which is windows.

  • Re:Yeah, right. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by donaldm ( 919619 ) on Tuesday August 21, 2007 @04:27AM (#20301985)
    Well if you have a Blu-ray player and you really would like to like to see one of the movies that come out exclusively on HD-DVD you can get the DVD and save some money since a good Blu-ray player will upscale a DVD on a HDTV but then again why would you want Shrek HD-DVD or Blu-ray for that matter when an upscaled DVD will look almost as nice.

    If you don't have a HDTV and are not contemplating one in the next few years this is a non event, although for those people with PS3's (approaching 5M world wide) then Blu-ray is the way to go. Surprisingly people do use the PS3 to play movies upscaled DVD and Blu-ray as well as playing games and in a family environment that is the norm not the exception. Of course you cannot tell some Movie execs that as the following following article http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi -hddvd21aug21,0,3873825.story?coll=la-headlines-pe -business [latimes.com] snippets mention:

    Katzenberg and Rob Moore, Paramount's president of worldwide marketing and distribution, declined to comment on Internet reports that hefty payments were the motivating factor spurring the two studios. Are we surprised to read this?

    Sony has sold 1.4 million PlayStation 3s in the U.S ( No over 1.8M). since launching the game console in November 2006, according to NPD Group. Ninety percent of Blu-ray movies are being played on the PlayStation 3, which consumers buy primarily to play video games, analyst Roden said. Hmmm I wonder how he arrived at that conclusion?
  • Re:Yeah, right. (Score:1, Interesting)

    by zonker ( 1158 ) on Wednesday August 22, 2007 @03:14AM (#20315339) Homepage Journal
    betamax died in the consumer market but caught on big in the broadcast industry.

    minidisc was big for a short time with some concert tapers (until they realized the quality wasn't as hot as they hoped for).

    the cd, while a joint venture with philips, was far and away a philips product rather than a sony one. sony did very little in the research and development of the technology aside from writing some firmware and creating the circ error correction system. they did however do a lot to promote the technology through advertising and theirh their own hardware.

    but make no mistake, it was philips that created almost all of the technology and they deserve 95% of the credit.

One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...