Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Books Media

Fantasy Author Robert Jordan Passes Away 571

willith writes "James Oliver Rigney Jr, author of the long-running fantasy series The Wheel of Time and better known to millions of fans by the pen name Robert Jordan, died on 16 Sept 2007 from cardiac amyloidosis. Jordan announced he had been diagnosed with the disease in March 2006 and vowed to beat the odds, but determination and gumption sometimes just aren't enough in the face of a disease with a median survival time of just over two years. Jordan was in the process of writing the twelfth and final book in the Wheel of Time series, A Memory of Light, but the book was not slated for release until 2009 and is still incomplete. While there is hope that the book will still be finished from Jordan's notes, this is devastating news to all of us who have been reading the series since 1990."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Fantasy Author Robert Jordan Passes Away

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 17, 2007 @01:26AM (#20632519)
    While I don't like to be the one to "flog a dead horse". The Wheel of time Series has been in a downward spiral since about book 5. Disjointed, dragging out endless plot lines in a poor attempt to make it to book 12. Personally I hope they don't bother to put book 12 together, I stopped at 9.
  • by Watersharer ( 209011 ) <marcbryce@h o t mail.com> on Monday September 17, 2007 @01:35AM (#20632575)
    First, let my condolences go out to his family.

    The books started with such promise, action and just the right hint of risque possibilities. But by the 6th book it had taken on this horrific endless Days of Our Lives persona that you just knew would not end well. By the 9th book I was so sick of waiting for something, anything to happen that I was just about unplugged. My wife bought me the 10th book, and I did something I almost never do...I flipped to the end to see if he finally wrapped it up.

    I put the book on a shelf and never read it.

    Maybe wikipedia will post the ending someday, and I will chance across it.
  • To the trolls... (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 17, 2007 @01:36AM (#20632585)
    The guy died.. please, show a little respect for the dead.
  • Too Bad (Score:2, Insightful)

    by ucaledek ( 887701 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @01:39AM (#20632613)
    I got into Wheel of Time fairly young--maybe just after the third book came out--and kept with it despite the punishing slowness of the books after, say, Lord of Chaos. But it really was something different, I think. It was epic, not a standard journey to slay the bad guy after this first couple of books, like so much of fantasy after Tolkien it seems. And though slow and a little tedious at times, it never pissed me off like the last couple of books of Dark Tower, which it seems is the standard metric for WoT.
  • by tuxlove ( 316502 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @01:51AM (#20632679)
    Personally I hope they don't bother to put book 12 together, I stopped at 9.

    There are thousands of people who have hung on for 17 years to reach the end of the tale, regardless of how much it had deteriorated in the later books. I have been unhappy with the most recent books myself, but I still wanted to find out what happens nonetheless. I probably speak for the majority of his readers in this. I'm saddened by his passing, and it would be even sadder if the story were never finished. It's almost certainly what he would have wanted.

    I hope his notes at least reveal the outcome to whomever picks up the story. (Orson Scott Card, are you available?)
  • by rrhal ( 88665 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @01:57AM (#20632701)
    Death is lighter than a feather, duty heavier than a mountain - The Great Hunt
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 17, 2007 @02:04AM (#20632739)

    a blessing on readers of Wheel of time
    Go fuck yourself. A great fantasy author has died and you mock him. Robert Jordan broke away from the standard cookie cutter fantasy epic outline. Whether the overall quality went down or not he did write some great stories. And that is what he will be remembered for--not some disappointed fanboy who criticizes a great author in the same way a sports jock criticizes Joe Montana for not being as good as he was in his prime.
  • by aichpvee ( 631243 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @02:19AM (#20632803) Journal
    I thought that he was finally getting back into form toward the end, especially the second half of #11. I'm sorry to see him go.
  • by aichpvee ( 631243 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @02:28AM (#20632839) Journal
    I've read a few interviews where he said that the ending had basically been written for years, so at least that's something. I hope they find someone to finish it. Despite losing a lot of focus in the middle it really has been a great series and was finally starting to look great again. It deserves an ending even if someone else has to fill in the gaps.
  • Re:A real pity (Score:5, Insightful)

    by bm_luethke ( 253362 ) <luethkeb.comcast@net> on Monday September 17, 2007 @02:51AM (#20632947)
    Agreed, however I would at least like to see the answer to a few questions that were supposed to be resolved. Closure (and not closure someone else made up - what he actually intended from notes) is better than no closure even if it is obvious where the new author picks up. If he was on schedule then he I would think that he should have had a good deal of it done (a 2009 release date is fairly soon, it's not like one typically writes a 1000+ page book and go through editing/printing in a year), though I have no idea if he was anywhere close to on schedule.

    If it is just another author filling in the gaps and answering - me I'll read it at least for the parts that he wrote. However the other stuff I'll just pick my own conclusion and assume it is as much cannon as what is in the book. This is why I tend to not read large multi-volume stories until they are done, I have read some where they just end right in the middle.

    It feels kinda crass to feel that sorta thing about some guys death, but if he is like any other artist I would bet he is happy that many people are disappointed that they didn't get to see the end of his works. Especially given the scope and amount of time he put into the series.
  • by bigstrat2003 ( 1058574 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @03:30AM (#20633143)

    If he failed to do that
    Aha, but he didn't. I personally, and all my friends who read Wheel of Time, loved it. Including the later books that are being reviled here. I also am reasonably certain that we aren't alone. Just because not everyone liked the whole series, doesn't mean he failed to make his books enjoyable.
  • by ushering05401 ( 1086795 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @03:38AM (#20633189) Journal
    IIRC you are correct about the WOT being a trilogy.

    Jordan's passing is all the more disheartening for this. He could have been an epic figure in fantasy lit, but he gave in to the marketing drones.

    I absolutely loved the series until the last chapters of book three. His legacy is fucked now. The later books in the WOT series are as unreadable as his work on the Conan series.

    Anyhow... RIP Jordan. You wrote more good lit than I ever did, even if the good material was the vast minority of your output.
  • by MutualDisdain ( 998780 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @03:41AM (#20633203) Journal
    Criticizing someone on their death bed before they've had a proper burial is just wrong any way you look at it. If Robert Jordan had been Hitler or Charles Manson, then I could completely understand it.

    This was simply a science fiction writer who was successful at what he did. Whether you think that success was warranted or not, you can surely hold your tongue (with your fingers so you can't type) until he's been properly laid to rest.

    The OP was yet another elitist who thinks his ego entitles him to cross all the bounds of morality and decency. He thought nothing of the writer's family, his rabid fans, or of the simple protocol entitled to all members of humanity. His only goal was to sew another one-liner rag into his poorly tailored ego, and gain praise for making a shallow joke.

    There's nothing wrong with hating Jordan's books, but have some manners with the timing of it, and when you do it, don't act like a pompous ass.
  • by speaker of the truth ( 1112181 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @03:41AM (#20633205)
    Did you just say that the writer dying is a blessing? How fucking offensive, especially to those of us who were as close to him in the end [dragonmount.com] as we possibly could be as fans. I hope the death of no-one you care about is called a fucking blessing.
  • by Skreems ( 598317 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @03:53AM (#20633267) Homepage
    Welcome to the internet, where nothing is sacred. Try not to let it bother you.
  • Re:One of the best (Score:2, Insightful)

    by 19thNervousBreakdown ( 768619 ) <davec-slashdot&lepertheory,net> on Monday September 17, 2007 @03:53AM (#20633273) Homepage

    Haven't read Brooks or Martin, but as a bit of nostalgia the last four series I read were the first and second Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, the Belgariad and the Mallorean, and Eddings definitely isn't anywhere near Tolkien, who although I personally can't fucking stand his writing style was at least a great author. Eddings... good God, if I read "oh ${ONE_DIMENSIONAL_CHARACTER}, you're a treasure!" one more God damn time I'm going at my eyes with large grit sandpaper. Maybe you're like me, and read it for the first time at 14 or so--I loved it then; looking back, I've apparently grown out of being fucking retarded. Now, you may say I haven't because I stuck with it through two whole series, but I'm going to call it 50% stubbornness, 45% incredulity, and 10% ... retardation. God what a horrible writer. Zakath's entire personality changes with no inner turmoil whatsoever, Eriond is all but forgotten for the majority of the Mallorean even though he's possibly the most important character, Sadi carries around an infinite supply of a drug for any situation but mostly throws "the brown acid" powder in dogs faces ... gah, I could go on for hours. I've rambled, but you need to re-evaluate your estimation there. The Elenium and whatever the other one was called was basically the same thing if I'm remembering correctly.

    As for Donaldson, yeah, he's an excellent author, but halfway through his first series I spontaneously coughed up an entire thesaurus and by the end I was pouring milk over bowls of Paxil for breakfast. The second series I think was just a transcription of the hallucinations of a high fever...

    No sir, as much as The Wheel of Time rambled in books 7-10.5, and as much as he allowed his taste in women to affect the characters he wrote (he could write good female characters, just didn't seem to want to), Mr. Rigney was a fantasy author of a caliber that hasn't been seen since Tolkien and won't be seen again for a long, long time. R.I.P.

  • A Great Series (Score:5, Insightful)

    by speaker of the truth ( 1112181 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @04:08AM (#20633359)
    People keep going on about how slow and long this series was, however it has been an inspiration to me and reminds me very much of the great George R. R. Martin series, A Song of Ice and Fire, which I've only just started reading. The only book I was dissapointed in was Crossroads of Twilight. In serial work not every issue can be a home run. Sometimes you need to make one be a sacrifice to set up the next issues which makes them even better. As a good storyteller, Robert Jordan realized this. Those that want EVERY thing to be issue, episode, whatever to be the BEST one there is, will of course not like this but I have a hard time thinking of any long pieces of serial work that they'll enjoy.
  • by kamapuaa ( 555446 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @04:32AM (#20633491) Homepage
    I love this classic argument [somethingawful.com]. Anyone who's never made a successful movie can never say Uwe Boll movies are crap. Anyone who's never been Miss Missouri can never say that chick gave an air-headed response. Anyone who's never written a #1 best-selling book can never say the Wheel of Time series is tedious.
  • by edderly ( 549951 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @04:45AM (#20633549)
    Although some of the comments here have been fairly tasteless (what do you expect on the Internet) I think it is fair time to reflect on an author's works.

    Obviously and unsurprisingly the Wheel of Time series dominates our impression of Mr Jordan. I'll start with saying that stand alone the first book is one of the best fantasy fiction books out there as far as I am concerned. I found the style and story imaginative and compelling, which is difficult to do in a heavily cliched genre.

    However, like many others I went along for the ride with the rest of the series up until a point where I became frustrated with the author and I personally gave up at about book 9 though I had effectively given up on the series a couple of books before that.

    I don't really know what Jordan's rationale for the length of this series was, I'm not a fanboy and don't follow any of the WoT forums for any insight into this, maybe I will do one day. I generally assume that he felt he had a story to tell and as far as he was concerned if it took many books to tell it - he would do so.

    The lessons of the 'Wheel of time' series are that you need to bring all your readers with you, and that the value of literature isn't in the weight of paper. Readers are frankly puzzled that after 4 to 5 thousand pages why Jordan left his main characters in stasis whilst opening up new plots and new characters in the later books. The publisher and editors have a responsibility to help authors in this regard even if it causes tension. I'm left wondering if Jordan had a more focussed approach he would have been the top fantasy writer of his generation, but now I suspect he will be remembered as a curiousity.

    RIP Robert Jordan
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 17, 2007 @05:06AM (#20633639)
    "Of course you are not a fan of this argument."

    That's because it's fallacious: aside from being an appeal to authority and argument ad hominem, your reasoning makes it impossible to criticize anyone unless I can do the things they do. I can't criticize the president because I'm not a politician. I can't criticize windows because I'm not a programmer. Also, very conveniently for your own ego, I can't criticize you because I'm not a raging, hemorrhoidal asshole.

    But I can criticize Robert Jordan because I am a published author.
  • by me-g33k ( 984217 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @05:24AM (#20633709) Homepage
    No matter what one thought of his works, we should remember that what was posted was about the passing of a man that has touched thousands of souls. Whether for good or ill, the fact that he has reached so many deserves some measure of consideration and respect. If nothing else but to contrast our own passing in this journey, we could hope that our own foosteps will leave behind a fragment of the memory that this soul has done.

    To the detractors I say, perhaps if you would look upon yourself and wonder what those you have touched would utter at your own passing, perhaps some charity and kindness would not be un-deserved.
  • by vux984 ( 928602 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @05:40AM (#20633775)
    That's a pretty rough criticism of a man who wrote a story that would humble Tolkien himself.

    I doubt it. Tolkien knew how to tell a story. In particular he knew that not everything that he ever envisioned happening on the face on the face of middle earth should be puked out into the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

    Tolkien could let characters like Gandalf go off on side quests without covering every detail. We only knew Gandalf was rescued by the eagles - that's about all that's in the book. Jordon would have taken us on that flight. We know he found his way back to Rivendell; Jordon would have taken us on that walk. At one point Sam is cooking some rabbits he caught - Jordon would have made damned sure we knew exactly how and where they were caught. And gollum? Jordon would have been sure to cover everything he did too... from leaving the mountains, to being captured and tortured, to his release, and tracked him all the way back to Moria. When the sword that was broken was remade, we didn't have half a book dedicated to the tale, nor the tale of its delivery.

    Tolkien's world is famous because of its immense depth and detail. Lord of the Rings is good writing because while you get a sense of all the depth and detail, its history, and its complexity. Very little of it is actually in the book; you know its there because you can see its 'edges'; but Tolkien didn't try to tell EVERYBODY'S story. He knew better.

    Consider that Tolkien had the fellowship break up. He elected to chase essentially 3 paths, not ALL of them. We could have had books dedicated to what Gandalf was doing, we could have followed Boromir's boat over the falls and into the hand's Faramir, and followed Faramir from there. We could have followed Wormtongue after he was cast out of Theoden's throne room back to Isendgard, or followed the Ents after they were roused... but we didn't.

    And had we done so, it would not have improved the book.

    At the other end of good 'epic' writing is the Foundation Trilogy by Asimov. Its the complete opposite of Tolkien - Asimov tells the story of the galactic empire seen through shifting perspectives at critical turning points. The effect works. You see Seldon's vision unfold, and though the vignettes are character driven and you connect with the characters, at the end of each vignette you see the big picture take another step forward.

    While it may be difficult to follow the individual plots of dozens of major and semi-major characters, that is a shortcoming of the readers mind and not the author.

    What is the Wheel of Time about exactly? Its not really about anything because its about everything. And its not about everything because its spends to much time focused on the minutia of individuals. It tries to paint a forest by telling you the story of every tree. And in the end you have neither a good sense of the forest, nor any decent connection to any particular trees.

    That's not the failure of the reader, that's a failure of the author. Because its a poor way to tell a story.
  • Re:One of the best (Score:5, Insightful)

    by 1u3hr ( 530656 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @05:47AM (#20633815)
    WoT, as a whole, is vastly superior to Earthsea.

    Unless you prefer to measure quality, not kilograms.

  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @05:54AM (#20633851)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 17, 2007 @06:19AM (#20633953)
    ...and how low have Science Fiction readers fallen that they are unable to appreciate that all but the hardest and most near-future Sci-fi stories are just magical machines in the future?

    And those that say they only read ultra hard factual science based Sci-Fi don't have the slightest understanding of what Science Fiction actually is, and should go back to reading research papers for their amusement.
  • by G-funk ( 22712 ) <josh@gfunk007.com> on Monday September 17, 2007 @07:46AM (#20634375) Homepage Journal
    Hundreds or thousands of decent people died in the last 24 hours. If *you* have had enough of an effect on the the world that random nerds care enough about you to make a reference to your legacy, count yourself lucky.

    Robert Jordan wrote some great books. Then he turned 1 great book into 4 shitty ones, and unfortunately died before the end. Sucks. But if you can't laugh about shit, what's the point?
  • by TheRaven64 ( 641858 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @08:18AM (#20634579) Journal

    Speaking as a writer, I would have no objections to someone making the same comment as the grandparent about me, after my death. It's funny, and if you can't take a joke at your own expense then being dead is the least of your worries. The 'give the family time to grieve' argument doesn't make much sense. This is Slashdot. If members of the family read this site, they will know what kind of comment to expect, and delay reading it for a bit if they think it will upset them.

    The most depressing funeral I have been to was that of a close friend of mine, where a large number of people who barely knew him stood up and spouted meaningless platitudes about what a great guy he was, many of them untrue. I would much rather have someone put some effort into a witty insult at my funeral than spout meaningless praise.

  • by mahlerfan999 ( 1077021 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @08:23AM (#20634635)

    It's so true. He should have done what R.A. Salvatore has done. Rather than taking his trilogy and making it 12 books long, he just wrote another trilogy using the same characters and then another. Then he wrote a prequel trilogy and so on ad infinitum. The end result is a story-line that is nearly as long as WoT, but is manageable because you take it in chunks. Each series of books is fairly self-contained, and tells a story in itself while still leaving enough loose ends on which to base another series of books. Actually, now, as I am writing, I am reminded of the best at this, Terry Pratchett. You don't even have to read the books in order. He really is a genius at making every book completely self-contained, yet having them still sit in a larger story line. In many of his trilogies I have actually read the second or third before the first, and it made complete sense.
    But that's just the style that *you* like. Jordan was writing an epic, there is a difference you know. Writers shouldn't conform to simply the most digestible, easiest format for readers. Else we would only have short stories anyway! lol For what Salvatore and Pratchett wanted to do, the standalone novel works, but for what Jordan, Martin, Elliott and others are trying to write (high fantasy epics) standalone novels will not work, even trilogies won't really work. They want to fully embrace complexity to show the unfolding of events that effect an entire world, you can only do that with a tapestry of characters and plotlines. If you don't like that kind of story, then just don't read it. Don't demand that the authors conform to your taste.
  • Tolkien knew how to tell a story.

    Well, to be more accurate, Tolkien knew how to construct a plot. As far as actually "telling a story", the man pretty much stunk up the page. His prose is so dry and boring and hard to read that I've never been able to finish the books. I know I'm not alone in finding his writing unbearable.

  • by comradeeroid ( 1048432 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @09:27AM (#20635269)
    You know, as soon as you know you're more likely to die than to live another year an author who has the least bit respect for his fans would coredump everything about the end onto a few reliable persons. Jordan strikes me as one of those. He wanted us to know the end when he got there.
  • by Psmylie ( 169236 ) * on Monday September 17, 2007 @09:35AM (#20635355) Homepage
    Respect for the dead is not inteaded to comfort the dead, it is to comfort the living left behind.
  • by nahdude812 ( 88157 ) * on Monday September 17, 2007 @09:37AM (#20635381) Homepage
    As the series progresses, the books get progressively slower up until book 11, when he starts really wrapping things up substantially. You could probably completely skip book 10 and not even notice it; at least book 9 something happened in the plot, even if it wasn't very much. Been a while since I read them, but I think the only significant plot advancement in book 10 was the rescue of someone (saving names so I don't spoil anything) from some Aiel, whose capture had happened somewhere in book 9. Their capture itself was not a significant plot element, and so far as I can tell has no outcome on the entire series other than to have given one of the major characters something to work on for book 10, which is good, because it's the only thing that happened.

    Like I said, it's been a while since I read that book, and it could be that I'm missing something, after so many books over so many years (and many re-readings of them, including most recently listening to them as audio books), what happens in which book gets blurry.

    I'm not trying to knock the series, just saying he seemed like he was stretching it out. I still think of the series fondly for all of that. I was eagerly awaiting the 12th book, and I do sincerely hope that a ghost writer is able to finish it. It's fairly epic, but the series would have been even better as 9 books.
  • by jesdynf ( 42915 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @09:41AM (#20635425) Homepage
    Why don't you stick to one line of argument before scrambling to the next in a desperate bid to keep the last word? I spent over $100 on his books before tapping out of following a story he ultimately failed to tell. It's a legitimate criticism.
  • by theghost ( 156240 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @10:39AM (#20636223)

    I don't blame Jordan so much as the editors.
    I've heard from a friend of a friend (for whatever that's worth) who is a writer that this is not missing the mark by much, but it's still Jordan who must bear the brunt of the blame. He needed a good strong editor, but his books were making so much money that he basically said to the publisher "my way or not at all" and got away with it. By the time the books got really bad so many people were hooked on the story that even the crappiest was a great money-maker so they were unwilling to reign him in.

    I don't think he was money-grubbing or stretching it on purpose. I just think he had a good story, but more ego than talent.

    Still, i would like to know how it ends and i feel sorry for his family.
  • by Artifakt ( 700173 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @10:55AM (#20636449)
    If all critical remarks should have been withheld until at least a week after his death, then where would they be expressed? This thread will be well over by then. Is Slashdot planning to start a new thread in a week or so? (And how could they announce it, if that itself might be taken as critical? "{Please hold all negative comments about Mr. Jordan for next week, when Slashdot will re-open the thread." Oooh! that sounds pretty critical, implying that not everyone has a high opinion of Robert Jordan's works!). So, we're in a thread where some people can post their opinion, free from any criticism, because criticism of each other's posts becomes criticism of the deceased? Handy for one side!
            And seriously, the attempt to stifle one poster you're referring to (by resorting to negative personal comments) was not just illogical, it was mean spirited, petty, and vindictive. For a moment, it made me personally think less of Mr. Jordan, that he was attracting the sort of fans who would stoop so low. You resorted to the same technique by labeling people hyperactive. Apparently, there is an ad hominem fallacy in your argument for decency, so excuse me if I don't just take your word that the previousl referenced post was free of them.
            That part of the thread where you joined in doesn't just concern Mr. Jordan, although I grant he's certainly central to it. By the time you posted, there was also a living person who was being insulted and abused. Your defense of this act shows you may think well of the dead, but have less respect for the living.
            Now I'm going to have to read at least one of the WoT series. To do otherwise would be to commit a logical fallacy myself and judge the man by the quality of his fans.

       
  • by Bob Uhl ( 30977 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @11:14AM (#20636749)

    That's a pretty rough criticism of a man who wrote a story that would humble Tolkien himself.

    Tolkien would be humbled by the Wheel of Time? Tolkien would be humbled by the Wheel of Time?!? Tolkien would be humbled by the Wheel of Time!?!?!?

    You have got to be kidding (or on some extremely high-quality intoxicants). If Tolkien had the patience to finish TWoT, humility wouldn't be the emotion he'd feel. Annoyance, probably. Disgust, possibly. Pity, very likely. Here's a comparison of the two writers:

    Tolkien
    • invented roughly two dozen different languages, with free borrowings from one another and a historical development of language and dialects over time
    • invented the history of a world on a grand scale from its very beginning
    • wrote some detailed stories covering very small periods within the above
    • finished each individual story
    • could write
    Jordan
    • wrote three or four good books
    • kept on putting huge amounts of words on paper ('writing' is hardly the term) long after his fans had decided he was insane and would never finish
    • never finished

    I too enjoyed the first several Jordan books. I was in grade school when they came out. I'm nearly thirty now.

    I will grant that Tolkien was actually humble despite his great talents and that Jordan was proud despite rather limited ones.

  • Zeno's Paradox (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Valdrax ( 32670 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @11:39AM (#20637157)
    I've read a few interviews where he said that the ending had basically been written for years...

    My friends who read the WoT series and I always had a theory that he'd written the ending years ago, and that in some strange, literary mockery of Zeno's Paradox, he just wrote the plot half-way there each time he churned out a new book.

    It certainly seemed like some sort of plot time-dilation was happening in the last few books by their accounts.
  • I disagree. As tedious as it was to read, damn near every bit of it was essential. RJ managed to do something you rarely see in any fiction, let alone epic fantasy: he created a world with believable motivations, character psychology, and consequences. Perrin needed an army, Emond's Field wasn't exactly enough to bring to Tarmon Gaidon. With Faile's following, Perrin gets a believable army that didn't just appear around him. In fact, some of the nobles that Faile trapped while in captivity will almost certainly try to break away, and now they're going to have to fight for the army they've already gone through so much for. That's part of what I love about these books. Our heroes are fucked, just plain fucked beyond belief for nearly 10,000 pages, but he somehow keeps it tense and believable that they survive (when they do survive :( ) the whole time.

    I think he went beyond three books for money, but he went beyond 6-7 because he got in over his head and created a bigger story than he had any idea. The thing is, he stayed absolutely dedicated to not letting the book become the usual fantasy cliche of God's favors falling from the sky when the chips are down and managed to actually write a great story even if it was hard to read for a few books. Who knows how far he got through 12? He might have actually pulled the whole thing off. I wouldn't be shocked if 12's story is just as amazing, even if it does lose his personal touch some at the end. I hope to God he had the climax written down in advance.

    I wouldn't worry about spoilers. Nobody will remember this by the time they get through 10 books if they haven't read them already, and if they do I think they have enough un-spoiled story to work with.

  • by __aailob1448 ( 541069 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @11:52AM (#20637343) Journal
    How dare you say that Tolkien didn't know how to tell a story? Are you insane?

    I love good stories. I've read books, watched movies and tv shows, listened to my grandmother's tales and a good story is a good story. You know it's good because it takes you to another place and you cherish the experience when it's over, period.

    Tolkien does this better than the vast majority of published storytellers.

    It's a pity you were never able to finish his books and I understand that writing style can turn people off (it happens to all of us) but what you claim is preposterous. Next time, just say you don't like his writing style.

  • by Sobrique ( 543255 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @11:55AM (#20637401) Homepage
    I felt badly ripped off by those endings. Deus Ex Machina went out of fashion in ancient greece, because even at that point, they realised it was lame.

    I mean, seriously. Endings may be tough, but ... hell even 'rocks fall, everyone dies' would have been a better finale than ... well, what we got.

    Thankfully, Pandora's Star/Judas Unchained, he's maybe learned his lesson. There is an ending. It's ... well, not _great_ but eminently credible, with some basis all the way through. I still don't know quite why he sent someone off wandering pathways, for no discernible reason, but ... well, most of the story is fairly solid. His 'concept' of a believable fantasy world is just superb. I really loved the whole nanonics/affinity stuff, and thought it was really superb. But ... yeah. I could rant all day. I won't. But it's just as well he did actually end gracefully, as I might have had to go and violence his boats otherwise.

  • Re:A real pity (Score:3, Insightful)

    by TheMCP ( 121589 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @11:59AM (#20637471) Homepage
    And he would have finished it, if each of his books wasn't 150 pages or so of plot and 450 pages or so of whining about how come she has prettier embroidery on her dress than I have on mine and I'm jealous that she has better furiniture than I do and unending angst over whether or not I should use my powers and whine whine whine complain complain moan whine whine. If all his characters weren't such whiny bastards, the series could have been done several books ago.
  • Agreed (Score:3, Insightful)

    by sheldon ( 2322 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @12:36PM (#20638131)
    I bought The Eye of the World in hard cover when it was first released. I'd read some of his prior works, Conan stories and so on and liked his writing. Each year, I'd wait for that next book and buy it hard cover the first week it appeared on the shelves.

    The first three books were incredible. Then I read four and five, and grew disenchanted. Waiting for the books, then finding out he wasn't wrapping up threads but rather further expanding.

    Finally I bought book six, got about half way through and then just quit. I couldn't take it any more.

    I'm sorry to see him pass away, but I never understood what he was trying to accomplish with this series. It had such potential, and then was just pissed away. Sad. I wonder if we'll ever know why, or what he had intended.

  • by spun ( 1352 ) <loverevolutionary@@@yahoo...com> on Monday September 17, 2007 @01:37PM (#20639315) Journal
    The thing that pissed me off the most is that his ideas were really good, and he had the capacity to create decent plots. But he kept stringing us along and his plots went to hell, and then there was basically nothing because his character development and skill as a wordsmith are seriously lacking.

  • by SonicTheDeadFrog ( 1155815 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @03:07PM (#20640943)
    I think your perception on where the WoT series moved during the fourth book is a little misinformed. The pacing of the series was based on the premise that it might only make it for three volumes, but if it remained popular it would be expanded to twelve. If the last nine were never made, the first three would need to stand on their own somewhat. In other words, what you're interpreting as a breakdown was really part of the plan from the beginning. I suppose that probably did have a lot to do with pressure from TOR, but if Jordan's own words could be believed, the more involved (and therefore lengthy) style was his style of choice.

    Personally, I am one of those people who criticized this from the sidelines for years, reading bits and pieces and making high-handed declarations about how it was "just another fantasy series" unremarkable, and needlessly wordy. But most of that changed about three years ago when I actually sat down to give it a fair evaluation. People who think this is unnecessarily long would probably say the same thing about Tolkien, and I just can't agree with them. None of the description is superfluous. Jordan doesn't write filler to beef up his page count, his stories are simply that involved and complex, and reading them is a very rewarding experience. This series, finished or not, will always find a place of honor on my bookshelves.

    As far as Card goes, I'm 100% in agreement with you. I can't tell where Card went wrong, however - whether his early writing was from the heart and took a downturn when he tried to be a crowd pleaser later on, or whether his best work was done when he was trying to be a crowd pleaser and his work deteriorates when he's left to his own devices (like the Wachowski Brothers).

    At any rate, I know that Card was a fan of Jordan's work, and though I don't care much for Card's more recent work, I wouldn't expect he would ghostwrite in his own style, or embellish from his own imagination. He would probably handle the story with the utmost respect and care, and although fans would swear blind that they could tell the difference, Jordan himself probably couldn't were he alive.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 17, 2007 @06:00PM (#20643775)
    Indeed, that is a very purposeful thing he did in his works, he drew from cultures, so that the northern nations, along the Blight were drawing from Japanese culture prodominately, thus the Blightlander's saying is a Japanese saying, and their old fables are all historical events. Like the one about Queen Elizabth, and the one about Neal Armstrong. Unfortunately, it would ruin the atmosphere of the book if everything had a bracket behind it naming the origins of the phrase or cultural element, he left it for the reader to recognise and understand or simply accept and move on, oblivious to the allusions.
  • by Dan Hayes ( 212400 ) on Tuesday September 18, 2007 @05:34AM (#20649139)
    Nice to see someone else who agrees with my thoughts on it. What I love about Jordan is the sheer scope and intricacy of the story, how there are so many disparate plot threads that weave in, out and around each other. I can't think of another series which has so many different characters as part of the story.

This file will self-destruct in five minutes.

Working...