Canadian Dollar Reaches Parity with US$ 702
boxlight writes in to mark the occasion when the Canadian dollar hit parity with the US dollar for the first time in 31 years. The article notes that Canada has run a budget surplus in each of the last 10 years. "This is actually bad for the profits of Canadian corporations that sell their products to the US for US dollars (Canada sells far more to the US that the US sells to Canada); but it means us Canucks will get cheaper Macs as the Canadian prices get closer to US prices with every new release."
Re:Article is useless without a graph! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Article is useless without a graph! (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.x-rates.com/d/USD/CAD/graph120.html [x-rates.com]
Re:Article is useless without a graph! (Score:4, Informative)
This has been going on near the border for years (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Article is useless without a graph! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar (Score:3, Informative)
Yes. $4 per hour in Canada would be illegal. The lowest allowable minimum wage in Canada is $7, and it is typically around $8 depending on what provincve you live in.
Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar (Score:2, Informative)
* American products become cheaper to foreign markets. This helps with the trade imbalances we currently have.
American products are cheaper. American employees paid less or offshored.
* Foreign products become more expensive to American consumers, also helping with trade deficits.
Most products sold to American consumers are foriegn products. American employees being paid less because of the first point above also have more difficulty affording most products they buy, because of the second point.
* It discourages foreign workers from sneaking into the US. Getting $4.00 an hour is suddenly not so much compared to what they get paid in their home country.
Doesn't matter, because we don't need them to come to America. We can just oursource and offshore to them in their own country.
Freefall.... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Article is useless without a graph! (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/economy/loonie.html [www.cbc.ca]
CDN book prices are a rip-off (Score:5, Informative)
Complain about it here: http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/ [competitionbureau.gc.ca]
Re:Article is useless without a graph! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? (Score:3, Informative)
And in response to the GP, we'll be thankfull that we've used up our oil and they no longer need to invade once the resource wars really flare up.
The middle east has a 40 year deadline. Canada has a reserve estimated to last 350+ years at current usage increase patterns.
Re:About time (Score:4, Informative)
1864 the greenback traded at less than 36 cents (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar (Score:2, Informative)
Someday, countries like Canada with lots of wheat will want something besides debt instruments in exchange for their goods. So too will countries like Saudi Arabia want something of tangible value in exchange for their oil.
Actually, Canada exports more oil and gas products to the U.S. than Saudi Arabia. We're your number one source for oil imports [doe.gov], which is one reason our dollar is so strong.
Re:Freefall.... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Book Prices? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:fiat money sucks (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Article is useless without a graph! (Score:3, Informative)
Food and electronic goods from the U.S. should, of course, reduce in price quicker, but it can still take many months.
Re:Article is useless without a graph! (Score:3, Informative)
The trade deficit is a big problem, with complex, hard to summarize causes.
The budget deficit (and resulting national debt) is a big problem, with straight a forward, easily summarized cause: the election of idiots, particularly the last 3 Republican ones.
Re:Article is useless without a graph! (Score:3, Informative)
Were you thinking of non-parallel skewed lines? These would be lines which are not parallel because the perpendicular distance between them is variant over their length, but which are not coplanar, and I believe must be members of parallel planes, so necessarily do not intersect.
Two lines can't really be colinear without being the same line. Not in euclidean geometry anyway (and actually, now that I think of it, not in more exotic geometrical systems either).
If two lines describe the same set of points, though, and you're calling them two separate lines, they would necessarily also be parallel even as they intersect one another throughout their entire length. Consider a definition of "parallel" meaning the perpendicular distance between the two lines is constant throughout their length.
I really hope I don't get modded (-1, Pedantic) for this one....
Re:cheaper Macs (Score:3, Informative)
I'm surprised no one else noticed this mistake, but you're comparing an 8GB ipod nano on those Canadian websites to a 4GB ipod nano on the American website.
Here's a correct comparison:
Bestbuy.ca 4GB ipod nano [bestbuy.ca]: $169.99 Canadian
Bestbuy.com 4GB ipod nano [bestbuy.com]: $149.99 American